In the passage by Paul Bogard, the issue of darkness diminishing as time goes on is addressed. Recently, this is a very significant problem for many different forms of life, and Paul Bogard does an exquisite job at explaining how the problem is detrimental to humans and why it even matters. Throughout the passage, Paul Bogard uses personal experiences, interesting concepts, and concrete facts to back up his claim that darkness disappearing is not good for the world. In the first place, Paul Bogard begins the passage by describing a personal story that exemplifies the problem of light pollution and diminishing darkness. For example, the author talks about him knowing "woods so dark that" his "hands disappeared" before his eyes and "night skies in which meteors left smoky trails across sugary spreads of stars." Specifically, this is a very good way to initially get the reader engaged, for it not only shows an interesting story, but it supports the claim that he brings up later in the passage. Also, people typically like anecdotes because they convey emotion directly to the reader and help get the point across clearly and concisely. …show more content…
Furthermore, Bogard delves deeper into the problem of light pollution by bringing up hypothetical situations that would happen in the absence of darkness. One of these situations is, but is not limited to, him mentioning how humans on Earth today would not have "the chance to witness" how darkness has "inspired artists, philosophers and everyday stargazers since time began." This is significant because it explores a hypothetical situation that would be terrible, and it all would result from the loss of darkness, which helps further Bogard 's argument that darkness is vital to human