ipl-logo

David Crystal Texting

833 Words4 Pages

In the article “2b or Not 2b,” David Crystal claims that texting is not killing the language, it is making it more evolve to the generation. He believes that the younger generation is able to show more creativity by using text as a source of communication. He also points out the increasing evidence that show how texting is helping rather than hindering literacy. He points out, one American study shows that less than 20 percent of the text messages that they looked at showed abbreviated forms of any kind and it was even less in Norwegian study. This just goes to show there is this whole stereotype about youngsters always using abbreviations when they are texting. Crystal starts off by looking at the background from when it begin, how in 2001 …show more content…

Crystal goes on to say that though texters break the linguistic rule, they know that they need to be understood. There are many ways to write a text, some texters write long test which contains more information. Some use single letter, number, and symbol to represent a word. This proves that there are more than one way to text and also how one is able to use the method that suits them to get their message across. This shows that we have the ability to be linguistically creative and adapt to the language that suites our …show more content…

And it’s a “spoken” language that is getting richer and more complex by the year” (par. 1). Therefore, since texting is very different from writing a paper for a class, it is promising to say that it would be hard for someone to confuse one with the other. It only proves the critics wrong because when people text, they know that it is only going to be read by the person they are sending it to. On the other hand, when a person is writing an academic paper he knows that it is going to be read by a professor or a teacher for this reason, he would write the paper with an academic

Show More
Related
188 Words | 1 Pages

The author, Natalie Wexler is a one of the founders of the board of trustees for the Writing Revolution. In her article, Why Americans Can 't Write, with the advent of email, writing ability has become more important than ever, and writing deficiencies have become increasingly apparent. The writing skills have been lacking in America, and the reason is because schools have only 24% of the students in eighth and 12th grades were proficient in writing and just 3% were advanced. The exercise doesn 't provide kids with the tools they need to write analytically. The standards in middle and in high schools teachers expect students to know things.

Read More
1268 Words | 6 Pages

Naomi Baron, a linguistics professor at American University, believes that texting is harming students writing. She states, “So much of American society has become sloppy and laissez faire about the mechanics of writing” (131). The author used this quote to drawl in the teachers who believe texting is harming students writing. Cullington goal is to make them continue reading and learn how she believes texting is actually beneficial. By putting the opposing view point of texting affecting writing in the beginning, is confusing to the target audience.

Read More
393 Words | 2 Pages

Today, texting has become the most widely used communication technique for teenagers and young adults. It is written in completely informal language and it has no literature value in it. Although the critics believe texting is destroying literature value, McWhorter has another opinion in mind. McWhorter thinks that texting is another form of language that is developed by teenagers. It is the creation of a brand new language evolving from the old literature.

Read More
550 Words | 3 Pages

The use of texting has resulted in laziness and betrayal of writing on the English

Read More
147 Words | 1 Pages

The magazine article “MSN Spoken Here” written by Charles Foran allures the attention of adults ranging from the ages of 40 and higher, particularly the ones who find text messaging an inconvenient way of communication in their everyday lives. This article appears to be about the transformation of the English language through electronic devices, visible in the 2004 lifestyle. However, based on Foran 's strand of language and, consequently, the binary word "Net Lingo" from paragraph five, it really is about raising awareness of the negative quality of messages that have become a barrier for the young demographic to properly communicate and connect with the older generation. Notably, due to the phrases and words of the English language that are

Read More
1201 Words | 5 Pages

Even in our phones, the way we text to one another, not actually writing in complete sentences, except using abbreviations and special characters such as emoji. With that practice, it is harder to come up with proper English to express actual feelings to others, and shall affect the way we communicate verbally with

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

These people say that technology allows us to access many sources of information at the touch of a button therefore gaining the ability to acquire greater amounts of knowledge without the superfluous details. Some even claim that technology allows us to reach our “ideal psychological state” through the stimulation short-term attention-grabbers on the internet (Anderson, “Just One More Game..”). It has even been claimed that texting “motivates students to write, practice” despite the fact that texting has detrimental effects on spelling, grammar and syntax (Cullington, “Does Texting Affect Writing?”). Socrates thought that with the development of writing, people would lose the knowledge they carried inside their heads. Socrates’ fears were proved to be unfounded though.

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

In her essay "Does Texting Affect Writing?", Michaela Cullington presents her argument that texting does not impact formal writing written by students. She discusses the concerns presented by many people about how texting language can transfer into writing, but through the use of personal experiences and credible sources she discusses how this is not true. Her use of multiple different studies and situations help boost her argument and allow the reader to truly see how students actually do formal writing. She presents a strong argument as to why those who believe students don't have the control and knowledge to write formally, instead of with text speak, are wrong.

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

It showed that students do not believe textspeak is appropriate in formal writing assignments. They recognize the difference between texting friends and writing formally and know what is appropriate in each situation. This was proven true in the student samples, in which no examples of textspeak were used" (Cullington 367). In order words, Cullington's research showed that there is little effect on writing ability from texting. She collected sample essays and found no evidence of textspeak.

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

Cullington after summarizing her research and having said both sides of opinions about texting affecting writing, she used the results as evidence of why Cullington disagreed that texting has no effect in writing. “On the basis of my own research, experts research, and personal observations, I can confidently state that texting is not interfering with student’s use of standards written English…” (Cullington 370). As you can see she used the strategy of disagreeing but with an explanation and summarized what her discoveries were. Cullington also agreed that texting is used on an everyday basis and at every moment that is possible. To agree to this Cullington included her own personal experience as a reference that texting effectively is used anywhere at any

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

In her essay “Does Texting Affect Writing?” Michaela Cullington addresses the issue of text messaging possibly causing poor communication skills and the use of textspeak, abbreviations used during text messaging such as “LOL” and “g2g,” in students’ formal writing. Cullington argues that “texting actually has a minimal effect on student writing” (pg. 367). She addresses the opposition directly, even citing credible sources. However, she also cites credible sources with better information to support her point, and even conducts an experiment of her own.

Read More
106 Words | 1 Pages

In Cohen’s article, he explains the downside and inappropriate times for texting and the effects from it. According to Cohen’s article, texting is not only becoming mentally harmful to younger age groups, but is also damaging to our communication culture.

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

Not So Fast” Andrea Lunsford researched students’ writing for 30-plus years to see what effect new technology has on how students learn. Lunsford discovered that students are actually improving their own writing skills with the help of mass media. Not only does it allow students more access to educational resources and information, but it also encourages students to do more creative thinking and writing outside of class which Lunsford refers to in her article as “life writing.” In her research she recalls the account of a student who sent a friend a text message which was completely informal and would be considered unprofessional by most piers. However, the same student also sent a very formal and professional report to her faculty adviser later on.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

Carr cites multiple experts, and views from the opposing side in his argument. This balances the article and brings fairness to his bias. Carr references multiple respected historical figures, and their opinions of technology. Carr utilizes Plato’s Phaedrus, where Socrates “bemoaned the development of writing” (326). Socrates was fearful of the future that mass writing may hold, as people came to rely on writing instead of carrying knowledge in their minds.

Read More
672 Words | 3 Pages

Not So Fast”, conducts her own study with a few colleagues to take notes on how students writing skills are changing. She decides to conduct another one twenty five years later to see how much the writing skills have changed since technology has been updated and became more available to students. She found that “students today are writing more than ever before.” Although we still have the same amount of writing errors as before, the patterns of errors are different. Many people argue that technology is only making our writing skill worse, this study helps to prove a different theory.

Read More

More about David Crystal Texting

Related Topics

Open Document