Dbq Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

517 Words3 Pages

The deployment of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by President Truman during WWII is a contentious issue still debated today. With an aim to achieve victory over Japan without any further loss of life or military resources, some say that his decision was logical and ultimately successful in accomplishing national goals. However, others regard this act as immoral claiming that such violence could never be justifiable under any circumstance. In support of dropping the atomic bomb, proponents asserted that it was crucial to quickly end the war and avoid further loss of American lives. According to Document 3, Secretary Stimson believed that deploying the bomb was crucial to quickly end the conflict and avoid a land invasion of Japan, which would have caused more American lives to be lost. Moreover, as document 6 indicates through a letter from a soldier who fought in the Pacific, many believed that deploying the bomb saved countless American lives and facilitated an end to World War II. According to various arguments put up by supporters of the bombing, it can be inferred that the usage of atomic bombs was an essential and justified action. The belief is that Japan would have prolonged the war further, potentially costing many more lives. Additionally, the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki made Japan sorry for initiating conflict, and eventually led to …show more content…

In document 2, Admiral Leahy argued that deploying the bomb would be both unethical and immoral since it resulted in the loss of many innocent lives without a justifiable reason. Moreover, he pointed out that there existed other viable methods for ending World War II without relying on such extreme means. Additionally, in Document 4, scientific experts wrote to President Truman noting their apprehension about utilizing nuclear weapons as they felt there were better

More about Dbq Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki