Document 42-B It was just a normal Friday night-shift for Guard 528. He worked as a part-time officer at the insane asylum. Walking into the asylum was like diving into a pool of screams. For any other person that is what it sounded like, but for the guards it was like walking into any other place.
For a pirouette to be perfect you have to have certain elements. If you don’t hold your core, spot, and place your arms correctly you will fall. Just like you can fall out of a turn Rome fell. There were three significant reasons for the “fall” of Rome, political assassinations, legal injustice, and natural disasters. Of these, the most important reason was political assassinations.
Roman citizens had come to consideration that they, indeed, did have a poor government. The Roman government gave an unjust life to people based on their social rank (Document E). This led to the citizens not appreciating the government as well as the Empire. Most of the emperors in Rome were assassinated so it gives the citizens the intention that if you did not like the emperor you can just kill them (Document A).This tells the reader that it was hard to govern Rome because they constantly kept replacing emperors. Considering that Rome did not have a stable ruling system, citizens of Rome began to doubt and not depend on their government.
Water and Rice While both the Romans and the Hans appreciated the technology used to power their cities’ water systems, the Romans were more intent on more “elite” advancements such as science and law, while looking down upon the more practical farming inventions that were appreciated by the Hans. As the Romans increased their slave labor via the conquering of territories, society’s elite cared little about making the work easier for their slaves. This led them to focus more on abstract advancements such as science and law. The Hans, however, relied heavily on agriculture and had a higher respect for its farmers, which promoted technological advancement in tools that would increase production. Documents 2 and 4 can be coupled because they both show the appreciation the Hans had towards the technology used in the agricultural sector.
The 19th century was a time of unification and centralization for the countries of Italy and Germany. Unification was a very controversial subject in Italy at the time because people’s opinions varied with residency, social class, religious affiliation, gender, occupation, and ideological outlook. Residency, occupation, and political power affected the point of views of the authors the most in the documents. Besides the debate of whether or not Italy should be unified, questions regarding how Italy would become centralized or why Italy should not be unified were a major factor when determining the future of Italy. For example, if Italy were to be unified, would the political system be a republic or monarchy.
Germany. Before the second half of the 19th century, Italy was a collection of city-states that were only loosely allied with one another. In 1848 major rebellions broke out within the German confederation, inspired by liberals who envisioned a German nation ruled by parliamentary government. The Prussian military leader was Otto von Bismarck declared the beginning of the German Empire.
Although nationalism alone played a vital role in the Revolutions of 1848, liberal politics and school of thought would ultimately change the way nationalism would take hold in the unification process -- facilitating both processes in Italy and Germany. In late February of 1848, revolutions spread
The first reason is Benito Mussolini, who just came to power and became the leader of Italy, decided to turn Italy into a new empire like Roman. The second reason is Italy had ambitions to conquer other countries like Ethiopia and Albania and also seize territories from France in retaliation
In 1919, Benito Mussolini created fascism in Italy, starting the conflicts we have had throughout history. After the war, “He organized several right-wing groups into a single force and, in March 1919, formed the Fascist Party—the movement proclaimed opposition to social class discrimination and supported nationalist sentiments, hoping to raise Italy to levels of its great Roman past.” In 1922, Italy’s government system began to turn into chaos, and Benito Mussolini offered to help make it right. By 1925, he was a dictator who carried out a large public works program and reduced unemployment, making all of Italy adore him. From that moment forward, he created an astonishing military force.
Mussolini made a group paramilitary unit called the “Black Shirts,” they would terrorise political opponents. Mussolini was successful and by 1922 Italy slipped into political chaos. Mussolini saw this as a chance to gain authority of Italy. Soon after this happened Mussolini declared that on he could restore order and he was given authority. By 1925 Mussolini had dismantled all democratic institution.
In Italy there were two powerful leaders, Garibaldi and Cavor. Garibaldi unified Italy and made an army of over a thousand men, they were called Red Shirts. Cavor ruled Piedmont and allied with France to make Austria attack him when he knew that he could win a war war against Austria. He was correct in his assumption when he beat Austria in war. They had more numbers and better weapons and organization.
In this essay, I will compare Mussolini's rise to power and totalitarian state in Italy to that of Hitler's rise to power and totalitarian state in Germany. Both became dictators through fascism in their own countries. Fascism is a militant political movement that emphasized loyalty to the state and obedience to its leader. Fascism's rise in Italy was fueled by bitter disappointment over the failure to win large territorial gains at the 1919 Paris Peace Conference. To numerous Italians, their democratic government seemed unfit to deal with the country's societal problems.
Italian history and media shaped the way in which Italians viewed their shared cultural identity in a uniquely Italian way; 'many people saw in fascism the realisation of their own ideals and interests; they then acted to ensure their triumph and, over the ruins of liberal civilization, to see them hallowed in the temples and rites of a new political civilization.' The question of whether or not Fascism transformed Italy or if Italy transformed fascism is one which remains unanswered and undecided by historians. On one hand, Mussolini tried to recreate a unique Italian nationalist idea by recreating the idea of the Roman Empire, this could be seen as Italy transforming fascism in a sense. However, when examining the deeper culture surrounding fascism and more so how it impacted Italian culture, it could also be said that fascism transformed Italy. In the words of Gentile, perhaps the Italian fascist experience can be best summed up by his notes that 'the choice of these people depended on the social situation they found themselves in and even more on the consideration of what they thought was in defence of their interest and would bring about the satisfaction of their
Freedom was wiped out of Italy as soon as Mussolini assumed power, the political, economical and social activities were all controlled by the fascists. Mussolini stated that “Everything within the state, nothing against the state, nothing outside the state.” At this time Mussolini was not yet a dictator, and was unsatisfied with the current coalition government that he was in. He wanted even more power than he had and so appointed fascists in important government positions. However, he did not stop there, he demanded that parliament give him complete control.
Benito Mussolini’s rise to power began at the beginning of World War I. Benito believed that it was his destiny to rule Italy. In 1919, he forged the parliamentary Fascist movement. He organized many unemployed veterans into a group known as the Black Shirts and they terrorized many government officials. He used this support to march on Rome and present himself to the king as the solution to Italy’s problems. Mussolini became Prime Minister of Italy in 1922.