ipl-logo

Defensive Realism Revisited By Jeffrey Taliaferro: Article Analysis

830 Words4 Pages

International relations refers to the nature of collaborations between two or more nations. Moreover, it defines the uniting factors that countries seek when establishing partnerships. In the article “Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited” by Jeffrey Taliaferro, the author attempts to determine whether international systems provide motivation for nations to expand their territories. Two primary strands of contemporary theories have been utilized to provide answers to the queries made by the article, namely offensive realism and defensive realism (Taliaferro, 2001). Yet, both concepts offer different solutions to the international relations, defensive realism appears more efficient since it provides optimism and incentives for nations to maximize relative security.
The difference between offensive realism and defensive realism is highlighted by the latter’s focus on anarchy. According to the offensive context, the lack of global governance and universal sovereignty gives an incentive for countries to expand their operations. Consequently, all nations seek to identify the ways through which they can improve their dominance over their …show more content…

This approach is consistent with relative power since security enhancements in one country depend on similar changes in another nation. As such, states may experience a security problem since they must take another country’s armed potential and foreign policy into account. Thus, defensive realism promotes collaborations between nations regarding the development of security-seeking strategies. This form of realism advocates for moderation in creating security approaches due to the possibility of massive variations in international expansions. The conditions for developments ensure that states consider relative power when entering into collaborations with

Show More
Related
1519 Words | 7 Pages

Viewing Ambassador Power’s statements through both the lens of liberalism and realism allows one to better understand the policies and ideas which she presents throughout her speech. The theoretical tradition of liberalism, specifically the neoliberal framing of it, assists in clarifying why it is necessary, in Ambassador Power’s mind, that states both cooperate and create a shared understanding of expectations by abiding to rules which have previously been defined and outlined. Ambassador Power argument shows that it is imperative that states join and posture to prevent Russia from taking any further actions, specifically ones which may jeopardize the security of the United States. Realism explains how the pursuit of power dictates the behaviors of states and the policies which they push. Given that there is a net amount of power, the prevention of another state, in this instance Russia, from gaining power inherently increases the power of all other states while at the same time escalating the security of said states.

Read More
2207 Words | 9 Pages

As a result, “states in the international system aim to maximize their relative power positions over other states” (Hamilton and Rathburn, 2013). Offensive realism is representative of Polk’s desire for territorial expansion because increased territory and resources are typically associated with power. When states compete to expand their territory, they often do so with the intention of expanding their sphere of influence within the globe. With the increased wealth, resources, and trade opportunities that accompany the acquisition of territories, states will be better equipped to increase their security by developing innovative technologies and expanding and improving their militaries. Additionally, with the increased populations that accompany land acquisition, there will be more workers present to stimulate the economy, creating a cycle of wealth and granting states a greater potential to become regional hegemons.

Read More
194 Words | 1 Pages

The Security dilemma is the notion that states need to secure their borders by increasing military strength or strengthening alliances. This action often leads to other states responding with similar measures, with an end result of increasing the tensions and threats to each other states, even though that is not the goal. For example if we strengthened our military along the Canadian boarder, even though we told them that we would not attack, as a result Canada would strengthen their army regardless. This cycle would keep repeating it self, unless someone eventually attacked. The most well known case of the security dilemma was between the USSR and the United States in the Arm’s race during the Cold War.

Read More
1787 Words | 8 Pages

From these theories a unique set of policy prescriptions emerge, which informs the policymaker how to best develop a plan of action. The American tradition lies with the realist perspective; it inwardly embraces the cold calculus of power, but outwardly prefers that its policies resonate with the democratic ideals of freedom and prosperity. This struggle between rhetoric and deed has brought about fluctuations and, at times, inconsistencies in U.S. foreign policy.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Defence is also understood to be an important contributing factor in a nation's economic strength and diplomatic influence in global

Read More
126 Words | 1 Pages

For Mearsheimer, this is the very basis of realistic thinking and in turn equates international order to anarchy. 2. Great powers maintain and continue to acquire militaristic capabilities in order to eradicate the idea of weakness and establish sovereignty over lesser powers. 3. A country can never be sure of another country’s motive hence each party is left

Read More
229 Words | 1 Pages

Parrots can weigh anywhere from zero point sixty five to one point six kg that is one point forty three to three point fifty three pounds. They can be anywhere from three point five" to forty" (Wild parrots of New York. 2015). On the chest, the grey feathers are white-tipped, giving a scalloped effect. Some blue can be found in the tail and flight feathers.

Read More
2260 Words | 10 Pages

Looking back over the development of the Security Studies field, there can be no doubt that the realist tradition has exercised enormous influence. Even the harshest of critics can acknowledge that with their focus on power, fear, and anarchy, realist theories have provided centrally important explanations for conflict and war (Williams, 2013). One interpretation of realism that is unbroken amongst most commentators of the theory is that realists are individuals that believe the State is the principle actor in international politics and that they are very concerned with the balance of power (Marsalis, 2013). They argue that all the State’s actions and choices are a reflection of the collective will of the people, which is also an argument

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

national politics Adam Watson’s Evolution of International Society gave a new dimension in the understanding of international relations (IR). He deeply studied comparatively the formation of international society and political community of the past which has evolved into the modern world system in his ‘Evolution of International Society’. Unlike Kenneth Waltz views of anarchy as the only system in IR, Watson says there are two systems viz. anarchy and hierarchy. In between these systems is the hegemony which defines the contemporary IR.

Read More
897 Words | 4 Pages

Idealism and Realism are two strongly opposed views of foreign policy. At the core of this opposition is the issue of power and security in politics. Realism establishes a separation between politics and ethics in order to understand and comprehend international events. Realists don’t oppose morality to politics, nor power to law, but rather oppose the utopian peaceful society to the nature of society.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

It believes that all individuals are born with an increasing desire to own power hardwired inside them. In these circumstances dominant states should do direct high power over their rivals. In the other hand, structural realism does not define the quest for power, instead it is focused on the structure of the international

Read More
1122 Words | 5 Pages

This chapter explains the methodology of the theory and covers identifying a suitable research question; clarifies the causes of believing in the idea that qualitative research methods are more suitable to neoclassical realist projects than quantitative methods. The international system is considered by neoclassical realists as an independent variable. Although the idea of the international system is similar to that of structural realism but, the nature of the strategic environment is different. Referring to neoclassical realism, the strategic environment has two major types: restrictive and permissive. The difference between these two belongs to the ‘imminence and magnitude of threats and opportunities that states face’ (p. 52).

Read More
1282 Words | 6 Pages

In practice, that is to say, this essay will first and foremost explain what is meant by Neo-Realism and Neo-Liberalism. It will then hone in on a similarity of crucial importance, namely that both are in agreement that the international system is structured anarchically. The rationale behind this is twofold: firstly, anarchy lays the foundations upon which both theories are built and, secondly, it is from this similarity that fundamental points of contention come to light. For example, although there is consensus that the international system is structured anarchically, neo-realists and neoliberals hold differing views on the nature of anarchy: the former argues that anarchy is all-encompassing whereas the latter contends that

Read More
1938 Words | 8 Pages

The current work is meant to explain the differences and similarities between the most dominant theories in international relations, Realism and Liberalism, both theories have some similarities and differences but much more important and interesting is to discuss and explain what differs and makes similar both theories. Conflicts and wars, Similarities and differences between Realism and Liberalism: Both Liberalism and Realism believes that there is no world government that can prevent countries to go to war on one another. For both theories military power is important and both Realism and Liberalism can understand that countries can use military power to get what they need or want. Also, both theories are conscious that without military

Read More
1381 Words | 6 Pages

The international relations schools of thought known as Realism and Idealism identify specific and similar characteristics of actors in the conceptual development of their theories. While many of these characteristics can be generalized as being synonymous with the two theories, both theories make a separate distinction in what specifically constitutes an actor. In Realism, the term “actor” refers directly and solely to the state: a combination of government, leaders, decision-makers, etc, that act as a unitary entity to promote the interests of the state. Idealists, however, expand on what constitutes an actor to include both the state and people. Not only do the principles of Idealism assert that the state and people should be considered actors, in fact, both they must be viewed as actors.

Read More

More about Defensive Realism Revisited By Jeffrey Taliaferro: Article Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document