US government has two different democratic theories of government, one being Majoritarian and the other being Pluralist. These two concepts of democracy face their own pros and cons within themselves and in some being a close structure to the US Constitution and the way it is set up.
Majoritarian models attempt to approximate people’s responsibilities in a direct democracy within the enclose of representative government. To make the government respond to the publics opinion. Citizens are supposed to be knowledgeable and control their representative’s actions by choosing them wisely, and voting public officials based on their performances. Us as citizens of the US have the right to vote no matter the religion, race, or social class. Our constitution gives the people the right to participate in political activities because it makes them think that they know about the government and political process in choosing our own representatives.
…show more content…
Due to this model, democracy exists when multiple organizations function separately from the government. Two of the major appliances in a pluralist democracy are interest groups and decentralized structure of government. Under this system, interest groups alternate points to present and argue their claims, weather a specific project in any country should get the financial administrated or service delivery system support. Now in modern society there are groups often formed showing economic, religion, ethnic, or cultural lines. These groups gather up regardless of what it’s about, and later on they all come together to bring all the ideas to one. This is what mostly helps in this specific political process, the diversity being portrayed within this system is what makes it a close match to our government