Write An Essay On Kant's Deontologism

799 Words4 Pages

Deontology is an ethical or moral duty, commitment, or obligation that is sometimes guided by the rule which binds every individual to discharge and contributes to self, others, and the society. It is the study of nature and a call to responsibility. In the metaphysics of what is morally wrong or right, I think Kant fails to recognize what is morally good but the consequences that termed it wrong may exhibit benefit that is greater. Relating this to organ transplant, would we think it is morally good to terminate one life to save others? Ethically, weighing the benefit to the life expectancy of the recipient can be considered good but will be wrong in Kant’s deontologism. The author does not consider consequences of any action but only view …show more content…

The author’s utilitarian viewpoint considers the consequences of any action to determine if the act is ethical or not. The author based ethical actions to make many people happy. What is morally right depends on the measure to produce a great amount of happiness and the least amount of pain. In relating Mill’s theory into ethics in transplant, risk versus benefit is weighed to make a decision with the least negative consequences. In the case of an incarcerated individual’s serving a life sentence, pros and cons are viewed considering age, a possibility of parole, how much benefit will the patient receive from such an action, and the question if the prisoner would contribute to the community if released. A known alcoholic individual who is engaged in a sedentary lifestyle without making a positive change should not receive an organ transplant because it would be a waste according to an as utilitarian view of the resultant consequences. The celebrity who no longer contribute to the society cannot be considered for the scarce resource due to the consequences that outweigh the happiness of one individual. Organ transplants are valuable, and it's considered to yield the best returns (Baillie, McGeehan, Garrett, & Garrett, 2013, p.