ipl-logo

Descartes Arguments Regarding The Existence Of God

496 Words2 Pages

1) Descartes philosophy has doubts concerning his existence. In his meditations, Descartes says that he knows of his existence because of his ability to convince himself that he exists. He says that he is aware of a supreme being that exists which makes him conclude that he exists even though he cannot prove his existence. His arguments are based on mind rather than senses. According to Paley, as much as Descartes has doubts concerning issues, he suggests creating a foundation on which to establish true beliefs. Hume also borrowed ideas from Descartes since his doubts about the truth of miracles relate to the doubts demonstrated by Descartes concerning his existence. Kant, on the other hand, believes in God’s existence but his arguments are based on logic, morality, rationality rather then emotion. Kant's arguments are also skeptic but he is more open to scientific aspect. I think Humes’ skepticism is true since there is neither a physical nor a scientific method to prove miracles. People still believe in miracles without any proof. Kant provides an answer to Hume with his opinion that the order in the universe cannot exist …show more content…

Once an individual has self-consciousness, they will recognize who they are, and guilt will be part of them. He acknowledges that self-consciousness can only exist if individuals recognize it. If it is not recognized, then individuals will live freely without having any obligations to fulfill or any forces within them that require them to do things. The two consciousnesses seem to be rivals as each competes for recognition, Recognition can take place only if one consciousness is absent. Hegel claims that if a consciousness exists independently, it will have no competitors just as a slave requires a master. A master feels and seems superior to the slave. The slave through his work and experience becomes independent and later on tends to become the master since the

Open Document