ipl-logo

Descartes Arguments Regarding The Existence Of God

496 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Rene descartes philosophy summary reflection

1) Descartes philosophy has doubts concerning his existence. In his meditations, Descartes says that he knows of his existence because of his ability to convince himself that he exists. He says that he is aware of a supreme being that exists which makes him conclude that he exists even though he cannot prove his existence. His arguments are based on mind rather than senses. According to Paley, as much as Descartes has doubts concerning issues, he suggests creating a foundation on which to establish true beliefs. Hume also borrowed ideas from Descartes since his doubts about the truth of miracles relate to the doubts demonstrated by Descartes concerning his existence. Kant, on the other hand, believes in God’s existence but his arguments are based on logic, morality, rationality rather then emotion. Kant's arguments are also skeptic but he is more open to scientific aspect. I think Humes’ skepticism is true since there is neither a physical nor a scientific method to prove miracles. People still believe in miracles without any proof. Kant provides an answer to Hume with his opinion that the order in the universe cannot exist …show more content…

Once an individual has self-consciousness, they will recognize who they are, and guilt will be part of them. He acknowledges that self-consciousness can only exist if individuals recognize it. If it is not recognized, then individuals will live freely without having any obligations to fulfill or any forces within them that require them to do things. The two consciousnesses seem to be rivals as each competes for recognition, Recognition can take place only if one consciousness is absent. Hegel claims that if a consciousness exists independently, it will have no competitors just as a slave requires a master. A master feels and seems superior to the slave. The slave through his work and experience becomes independent and later on tends to become the master since the

Show More
Related

Atheism In David Hume's The Natural History Of Religion

847 Words | 4 Pages

4, para. 1). In saying this, Hume is trying to make it seem as though he is promoting natural theology, when in fact he is not. In section 1, he addresses a common misconception of the time, that early humans were monotheistic due to their ability to look at the world around them and see everything as a result of one perfect designer. He disputes this and says that 1,700 years ago, all humans were polytheistic, just as the vast majority of people have been throughout history (sec. 6, pg. 6, para 2). Hume argues that polytheism is the natural conclusion that mankind reaches before they are able to “stretch their conception to that perfect Being who bestowed order on the whole frame of nature” (sec. 6, pg. 7, para. 1).

Read More

Cosmological Essay 'Does God Exist?'

1113 Words | 5 Pages

Hume questions the notion of causation within his philosophical work. In “Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion,” assumptions and speculations of how the world was founded are classified as not true empirical evidence. Hume believed that although everything in the universe had a cause we could not explain how the universe was caused. (Hume, 1779). Likewise Immanuel Kant opposed the cosmological theory, he also believed that there were limitations to how much we

Read More

Comparing Kant's Prolegomena To Any Future Metaphysics

1252 Words | 6 Pages

Precisely, Kant argues that Hume’s understanding of the connection of cause and effect is an important challenge to metaphysics but is not entirely accurate. The account of Hume’s objection that it is impossible

Read More

David Hume's Argument Against Impressions

384 Words | 2 Pages

is responsible for the effect, there is no proof that the cause is responsible for the effect’s occurrence, it could be purely coincidental. It could be imagined that the sun would go out before it rose the next day or that the sun would turn green the next day are all as justifiable as thinking the sun will rise tomorrow from the evidence from it doing so in the past. So it is because this claim is not contradictory and it can be conceived to be false, its not enough to just understand what it means to know it to be true. It takes going out and experiencing the world, to make these observations for ones self to see that the world is one way rather than another way. Therefore, according to Hume knowledge of matters of fact is impossible, he does acknowledged however that that people had to think in terms of cause and

Read More

Kant's Summary Of The Critique Of Pure Reason

2249 Words | 9 Pages

Hume’s views on causation stem from his own form of the distinctions between knowledge and belief, called “relations of ideas and matters of fact” (Morris, 2001). Relations of ideas are a priori and their truth can be determined simply by reason and does not depend on the existence of any particular thing. The example that is provided is: “The interior angles of a Euclidean triangle sum to 180 degrees” (2001). Simply by virtue of being a triangle, it is true that the interior angles must be 180 degrees, and does not require that a triangle exist naturally. On the other hand, matters of facts depend on the manner of the existent world.

Read More

Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, By David Hume

182 Words | 1 Pages

David Hume’s used various theories to prove that

Read More

David Hume Do Miracles Exist

533 Words | 3 Pages

Hume is one of the many people who

Read More

Treatise Of Human Nature By David Hume Essay

772 Words | 4 Pages

Scottish philosopher David Hume’s book A Treatise of Human Nature (1738), after it was belatedly acknowledged as an important philosophical work, shocked the scientific community. In his essay, Hume presented himself as a skeptic, doubting the human’s ability to truly know what is commonly considered knowledge, and even the reliability of science. Following the empiricist tradition of fellow British philosopher John Locke, Hume questions the origin of our ideas, and concludes they must all stem from experience. Yet, where Hume differs from Locke, or from any other philosopher thus far, is in his claim that there is no real way to know if causal relationships actually exist in the world. Hume’s claim was a direct challenge to modern science, as, at the time, one of science’s main efforts was to find causal relations that explained phenomena and use these relations to make future predictions.

Read More

Examples Of Skepticism By David Hume

215 Words | 1 Pages

Hume was a Scottish philosopher born in 1711 in Edinburgh, Scotland. Hume is famous for continuing the tradition of empiricism, started by Locke and followed by Berkeley, which sees knowledge as coming originally from sense experience. Hume differs from these philosophers, however, in that he remains skeptical about what causes our perceptions of things. While Locke assumes there is a material substance which causes our perceptions, and Berekeley presents the radical thesis that the cause of our perceptions originates in the Mind of God, Hume refuses to make either assumption. His skepticism leads him to question there really are “causes” and “effects,” or if our concept of causality is merely the result of the mind’s practical nature?

Read More

David Hume's Theory Of Contiguity

511 Words | 3 Pages

Hume harshly critiques the idea of cause, by denying its existence. As an empiricist and a skeptic, Hume asserts that the existence of cause cannot be affirmed, because we cannot examine it. Consequently, Hume is skeptical towards the rationalistic methods of science, as well as the concept of identity. He begins his argument against causation by attempting to examine both cause and effect.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Descartes And Hume

1404 Words | 6 Pages

Hume on the other hand can only confirm what has already happened, being that is the most truthful and logical

Read More

Treatise On Human Nature By David Hume

880 Words | 4 Pages

The thesis of the book is about epistemology, as he is only concerned with things we know. Hume begins by explaining his view on the “moral philosophy, or the science of human nature” (721). He states, “The one considers man chiefly as born

Read More

Transcendental Idealism

725 Words | 3 Pages

Fortunately, Immanuel Kant takes on the challenge of refuting Hume, but what makes Kant different is that he is not resorting to philosophical excesses like his predecessors. He instead develops a framework that deals with the fundamental basis of reason, which contains a priori truths, or truths before we perceive. To understand how Kant reached this conclusion, it must be understood that he already believed that we had reached universal truths (causation for example) via science and common sense. So he does not do what previous epistemological philosophers have, by trying to understand how humans acquire knowledge and then compare that to science to see if it is verifiable, but does the exact opposite. He develops a framework under the assumption that we already have verifiable knowledge through science and he looks to see how we acquired it.

Read More

Sleep At Night Kant

740 Words | 3 Pages

Also, causality – the glue of the universe – would be off the table. This is because if we look at our immediate sensory experience we find that it is impossible to see the supposéd metaphysical realities. Even though things like Newton's laws of motion and gravitation which seemed to illustrate, if not confirm, causality at work, were widely accepted, Hume suggested that science could/might simply be a useful custom. Kant's response turned the tables on Hume: asserting that while we Kant derive causality from experience, the fact that we have such a mental framework is absolutely essential. The fact is that we all share these categories of experience (unity, plurality, totality, reality, limitation, negation, substance, causality, community/reciprocity, possibility, existence, necessity), so even if causality does not/cannot exist out in the world itself, what matters is that we all still experience the world in much the same way; the mind makes the world, not the other way around.

Read More

David Hume's Beliefs

194 Words | 1 Pages

David Hume was a Scottish philosopher and skeptic who lived in the 1700’s. He led a type of moral approach to philosophy called Empiricism along with many other men. It was a different approach than rationalism, because the rationalists believe that humans are led by reason, but Hume argues that we are led by our passions. He wrote the book, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, which expresses his views on liberty, necessity, and religion. As an atheist, he gives reasons why all religion is false, especially in regard to miracles.

Read More

More about Descartes Arguments Regarding The Existence Of God

Related Topics

Open Document