ipl-logo

Descartes Meditation 1 Analysis

357 Words2 Pages

Section 1: Introduction
Is life as we know it real, or say a figment of our imagination, or can the possibility of some outside being controlling our every move be what is our true reality? In Descartes’s Meditation 1 it brings into question if we can truly know anything and if we should doubt our daily existence. I, for one, do think we know of our own reality or at least know for a fact that we are not controlled by some unknown being and can logically conclude that my existence and my perception of reality is true. Yeah, Descartes’s argument does bring us somewhat reasonable examples to question or doubt everything in the pursuit of knowledge, but if we did so on everything then will we truly know what is real or not. And to doubt our very own existence daily would be tiring to do, but Descartes’s breaks down his argument into three levels to avoid us from completely doubting everything and finding the truth of our existence.
Section 2: Analysis …show more content…

He first goes on to note that the senses can deceive us, and that things are not always just as they seem at first glance to be. He claims our senses can deceive us and our very own perception of reality or what events are happening around us can be false. We may believe that what we are experiencing is true, but who’s to say that we are not actually living some other existence but our sense of reality is deceiving us. Descartes then goes on to mention the dream problem, where he goes on to say that we may dream of the physical world but who’s to say that we are not imagining our very existence. Can we truly distinguish everything we know or perceive to be true from our dreams and imagination, and possibly doubt that anything physical truly exists, that there is an external world at

Show More
Related
1654 Words | 7 Pages

Notre Dame ID: 902008117 In René Descartes ' Mediations on First Philosophy, Descartes abandons all previous notions or things that he holds to be true and attempts to reason through his beliefs to find the things that he can truly know without a doubt. In his first two meditations Descartes comes to the conclusion that all that he can truly know is that he exists, and that he is a thinking being. In his third meditation, Descartes concludes that he came to know his existence, and the fact that he is a thinking being, from his clear and distinct perception of these two facts. Descartes then argues that if his clear and distinct perception would turn out to be false, then his clear and distinct perception that he was a thinking being would not have been enough to make him certain of it (Blanchette).

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

Descartes’ first indubitable truth is “I think; therefore, I am.” His existence could not be doubted because Descartes knew that he had to exist as long as he was to think. Initially, his method of doubt had disproved everything that he had believed in, leaving him nothing but his self. Descartes then pondered on the idea that it was useless to claim that a thing was real or not without a solid foundation. One must first doubt everything that they know in order to conclude that there is anything that which one knows for indubitable truth, certainty.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

Rene Descartes was a great philosopher who is known for creating systemic doubts of the world around us. The purpose of the perpetual doubts was to scrutinize any belief and statements that an individual view as truthful. Descartes writings have been the backbone of arguments for skepticism since they were first brought to light, in particular skepticism born about the existence of an external world. In his first meditation Descartes introduces the idea that we cannot know for certain about the existence of an external world since he explains how he cannot distinguish dreaming from waking life in occasion, therefore, all the experiences he beliefs to be of waking life could be nothing but a mere dream. Descartes bases his argument on the fact that there is no feature that can shows us and give us the certainty that waking life is different from dreaming.

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

We know clear and distinct perceptions independently by God, and his existence provides us with a certainty we might not possess otherwise. However, another possible strategy would be to change Gods role in Descartes philosophy. Instead of seeing God as the validation of clear and distinct perceptions, rather see him as a safeguard against doubt. This strategy, however, is a problem since it re-constructs the Meditations – Philosophical work of Descartes –.This is because it would not be God, who is the ultimate foundation of knowledge, but the clear and distinct

Read More
511 Words | 3 Pages

He was trying to find a base of knowledge so reliable that the strongest of skepticisms cannot destroy it. Descartes bring up situations or scenarios of how we can be deceived from our own senses. For example, Descartes states that, “Whatever I have up till now accepted as most true I have acquired either from senses or through the sense. But from time to time I have found that the senses deceive, and it is prudent never to trust completely those who have deceived us even once” (page 12).

Read More
1919 Words | 8 Pages

In the sixth meditation, Descartes postulates that there exists a fundamental difference in the natures of both mind and body which necessitates that they be considered as separate and distinct entities, rather than one stemming from the other or vice versa. This essay will endeavour to provide a critical objection to Descartes’ conception of the nature of mind and body and will then further commit to elucidating a suitably Cartesian-esque response to the same objection. (Descartes,1641) In the sixth meditation Descartes approaches this point of dualism between mind and matter, which would become a famous axiom in his body of philosophical work, in numerous ways. To wit Descartes postulates that he has clear and distinct perceptions of both

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

In this paper, I will deliver a reconstruction of Descartes’ Cogito Argument and my reasoning to validate it as indubitable. I will do so by justifying my interpretations through valid arguments and claim, by showcasing examples with reasoning. Rene Descartes is a French Philosopher of the 17th century, who formulated the philosophical Cogito argument by the name of ‘cogito ergo sum,’ also known as “I think, therefore, I am.” Rene was a skeptic philosopher amongst many scholastic philosophers at his time. He took a skeptical approach towards the relations between thoughts and existence, to interpret his cogito argument as indubitable and whether it could serve as a foundational belief.

Read More
1520 Words | 7 Pages

In his Sixth Meditation, Descartes argues that (1) mind and body are distinct, and (2) mind and body form a union, in which the mind and body can interact with each other. To better understand a union, take the example of ‘3 meters’: a measurement, i.e., union, formed from the number ‘3’ and the unit ‘meter’. Descartes argues in his Second Meditation that he can conceive of a mind as essentially a thinking thing, not an extended thing. Thus, he argues that a mind can exist without being extended, since extension is not in the essence of a mind. Similarly, he argues in his Fifth Meditation that he can conceive of a body as essentially an extended thing, not a thinking thing.

Read More
1952 Words | 8 Pages

Unlike Plato, Descartes does not reject all sense experience but he says that we need to avoid believing all things that are not entirely certain. “ It is necessary that at least once in your life you doubt, as far as possible, all things.” In order to succeed with his scepticism and doubt, he had to start fresh with a tabula rasa. He did this by going through three waves of

Read More
295 Words | 2 Pages

In Descartes’ second Meditation, he examines the issue surrounding the derivation of “I.” “I,” according to Descartes, is not only someone that thinks, but is someone that imagines. The issue that is prevalent in this Meditation is the mystery surrounding the block of wax. The wax argument is supposed to show the certainty or lack thereof of our overall knowledge in regards to the human mind. At first, Descartes cogitates what he has the ability to know about the piece of wax by means of its senses. The wax’s hardness, size, smell, taste, and color are all examined in a solid state.

Read More
1000 Words | 4 Pages

Justified, true belief knowledge is only real if there is no conceivable doubt, but nothing can truly be inconceivable fact. In “Mediation I: What can be Called into Doubt”, Descartes tries to find solutions to this, but he only raises more questions about the world. Skepticism arises to challenge the idea of a perfect knowledge and to question the human mind and the world. Descartes reflects on the countless falsehoods he believed that became his knowledge about the world and wipes everything out of his mind to begin anew. Descartes starts with the foundations of knowledge, deciding only to accept opinions as truths when there isn't any conceivable doubt in his mind.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

In his philosophical thesis, of the ‘Mind-Body dualism’ Rene Descartes argues that the mind and the body are really distinct, one of the most deepest and long lasting legacies. Perhaps the strongest argument that Descartes gives for his claim is that the non extended thinking thing like the Mind cannot exist without the extended non thinking thing like the Body. Since they both are substances, and are completely different from each other. This paper will present his thesis in detail and also how his claim is critiqued by two of his successors concluding with a personal stand.

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Rene Descartes is considered as one of the most important founders of modern day philosophy. His greatest contribution to philosophy is his meditations. This paper aims at establishing what wax represents in Descartes meditations. In his second meditation, Descartes introduces the idea of wax freshly obtained from honeycombs.

Read More
1404 Words | 6 Pages

Descartes and Hume. Rationalism and empiricism. Two of the most iconic philosophers who are both credited with polarizing theories, both claiming they knew the answer to the origin of knowledge and the way people comprehend knowledge. Yet, despite the many differences that conflict each other’s ideologies, they’re strikingly similar as well. In this essay I will attempt to find an understanding of both rationalism and empiricism, show the ideologies of both philosophers all whilst evaluating why one is more theory is potentially true than the other.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

When I try to conceive of the self, I do not think of the mind but bodily behaviour, i.e. physical displays of anger. If we cannot gain an impression of the mind, then we cannot possess an idea of the self. The assertion that Descartes has a clear and distinct perception that he is “... a thinking thing” is therefore made redundant and his conceivability argument is

Read More

More about Descartes Meditation 1 Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document