ipl-logo

Describe How Principles Work In Resolving A Case Study

1282 Words6 Pages

PHIL 325 Paper Two Assignment Adeel Khan 10146958 University of Calgary In this paper I intend to state arguments in support of the inclusion of principles in the law. I will explore the meaning of adequate resolution of legal cases and provide examples of principles explaining how these principles work in resolving a case. I will evaluate legal cases that set the precedence for the inclusion of principles in the law. From my standpoint, in development of a thesis I would argue that the inclusion of principles in the law is a convincing stance and through the evidence presented in this paper, this position is enforced. The argument being approached in this paper is in regards to legal positivism. legal positivists argue that there …show more content…

What sort of legal cases does the proponent of the argument have in mind? What are these sorts of legal cases called? What does it mean for a legal case to be adequately resolved? Give some examples of principles. Describe how principles work in resolving a case. Describe what happens when two principles conflict Describe how rules work in resolving a case. Describe what happens when two rules …show more content…

I would criticize such a claim and ask how an entire system of laws that is pursued with morally bad aims can provide reason for judges to apply such law or citizens to obey it. Legal positivists insist that laws do not need to aim at morally good goals; however, I would argue that this is terrible distortion of what distinguishes life under law from tyranny or a war against all. Furthermore, an opponent of the argument can also insist that judges are within bounds to legislate on the basis of rules of law. However, in these cases, judges work from a set of principles which are used to formulate judgements and these principles form the basis of present rules. Legal systems have a function. This function is to secure justice. The effective reply to opponents of the argument is to discuss the necessary overlap between legality and justice, as it is impossible to have a legal system without fidelity to the rule of law and formal justice. It is proper for the legal system to interpret the law in light of the correct principles of justice that countries tie to their honor. There are necessary moral constraints on the content of law. As human beings, it is simply impossible to ignore moral principles in any aspect of life and the law is not excluded from such precedence. In my evaluation I would argue that it is an essential feature of the law that it has moral

Show More
Related
249 Words | 1 Pages

What current issues are facing the court? Essay

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

The judge is asked to decide, the judge set out the logic and must reason that he or she used to arrive at the final decision. The body of decisions made by judges is what we call case law. The principles in common law are similar facts that should make the decisions similar. That being, to be consistent. The judge must look at the past decisions to make sure that his or her follow the same logical decision and reasoning.

Read More
533 Words | 3 Pages

Mine and your opinions can both be right and they can possibly both me wrong. Most of the time it is okay to disagree. In Susan Glaspell’s short story “Trifles” Mrs. Peter states, “But, Mrs. Hale, the law is the law.” Mrs. Hale shows anger at the men and particularly at Henderson for what she regards as the sneakiness of using Mrs. Wright's own home as evidence against her, but Mrs. Peters defends the men in her assertion that "the law is the law. "

Read More
1252 Words | 6 Pages

These judicial rulings form common law. 2. Briefly describe the following court hearings and explain their main purpose: (6 marks) a. A jury trial

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

Unlike previous legal theorists who construed the legal system as merely punitive codes of conduct implicated by a sovereign figure to private citizens, H. L. A. Hart argues that there are supplementary aspects of the legal system that goes beyond these “primary rules” (79). According to Hart, if the customs of a society consists of only primary rules, this form of standards will be permeated with flaws, and cannot be considered as a legal system (92). The mains flaws indicated by Hart are issues of uncertainty, static, and inefficiency (92-93). Uncertainty relates to the doubtful existence of the rules as they are not statutory rules; static relates the inflexibility of the rules; and lastly, inefficiency relates to the lack of force in promulgating the rules (92-93). Along with delineating the flaws, Hart also provides solutions to each flaw, which

Read More
1244 Words | 5 Pages

Research from Dauvergne &Millbank posit that Jurisprudence is about the right to appeal through the admisntratrive appeals tribunal which consider if the client is at risk of danger (2002, p.

Read More
1733 Words | 7 Pages

The law helps resolve disputes that cannot be resolved through a formal means of alternative dispute resolution. The highest important function of law is to protect each individual from violations and unreasonable intrusions of rights by another individual, organization, or even government. Morality Defined Morality is principles that purposely define a distinction between right, wrong, and even bad behavior. “It is a particular system of values and principles of conduct.” (2002) Individuals and even as a society must uphold these values and principles.

Read More
922 Words | 4 Pages

The extent to which the law should reflect a moral vision even when this involves an interference with the rights of individuals who might disagree with that vision has been debated for centuries by lawyers, philosophers and theorists. This issue has been contested in particular by legal positivists and naturalists as well as liberal and conservative commentators. The extent to which the law should reflect a moral vision is also impacted by culture, as Western and Eastern cultures have very different perspectives on the matters of law and morality. In reality, there is no definite answer to this moral dilemma, however one can explore the different views and attitudes of commentators, philosophers and indeed societies of different cultures to

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

In criminal law, the principle of legality is designed to guarantee the primacy of the law in criminal procedure, so that neither state prosecution nor defendants are exposed to arbitrary bias. Arbitrary bias meaning subject to individual will or judgement without restriction; contingent solely upon one’s discretion decided by a judge or arbiter rather than by a law or statute. In essence, the principle of legality means that criminal liability and punishment should be based upon a prior enactment of a prohibition that is expressed with an adequate precision and clarity.

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

However, the situation changed after the emergence of the doctrine recognized in the court practice of some states, but rejected by the others. It suggested replacing a traditional method of solutions to the conflicts with the direct search of the law which is most corresponding to circumstances of a dispute. The Supreme Court never found desires to interfere with the sphere of a collision of laws and the development of uniform norms, even though some provisions of the Constitution opened for them such an opportunity. It is necessary to make one more remark concerning a collision of laws which illustrates how the common law in the USA is understood by people and how the American lawyers treat laws. Judges have to know the law, from the parties it is not required to state its contents.

Read More
1049 Words | 5 Pages

The main goal of law and our judicial system in general is simple equal justice for all. The problem we face is the system is often viewed as unfair, but why and how could a system that is supposed to rule fair and just come under such scrutiny? The simple answer is the highest of courts are handpicked by those in power and we all know what power can do to individuals, all of this then causes a system bent on domination not true justice. Our judicial system has derailed from the tracks of justice and has fallen to a system based solely on power and domination like many things in our culture.

Read More
1125 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout history, the function of law plays an inevitable part of a society. Law has been defined in many different ways. The general definition of the law is a formalistic approach which a rule of conduct and action is prescribed to control authority and legal binding force (Melvin, 2011). Marx and Engels stated that the key constitutional function of law was to obscure power through treating everyone in society equally (Inderbitzin, Bates & Gainey, 2014). However, Marxists argue that those who established the law tend to neglect inquiry as they are in favour to preserve their own material basis and those who have elite power (Quinney, 1974).

Read More
1987 Words | 8 Pages

How to judge that whether something is law or not and at the same time critically

Read More
1546 Words | 7 Pages

This essay will aim to answer the question of whether the judicial system in the UK should approach cases with a legal positivist

Read More
977 Words | 4 Pages

Law is defined as the principles and regulations established in a community by some authority and applicable to its people, whether in the form of legislation or of custom and policies recognized and enforced by judicial decision. It is also possible to be described as the body of official rules and regulations, generally found in constitutions, legislation, judicial opinions, and the like, that is used to govern a society and to control the behaviour of its members, so law is a formal mechanism of social control. Legal systems are particular ways of establishing and maintaining social order. Morality, on the other hand, is defined as the principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behaviour. It speaks of

Read More

More about Describe How Principles Work In Resolving A Case Study

Open Document