ipl-logo

Deshaney V. Winnebago Case Analysis

872 Words4 Pages

An Analysis of DeShaney v. Winnebago County Social Services Randy DeShaney, father of Joshua DeShaney, spent more time beating his four-year-old son than he did in prison. (Reidinger 49) Joshua’s mother, Melody DeShaney, sued the Winnebago County Department of Social Services alleging that they had deprived her son of his Fourteenth Amendment right. In order to understand the DeShaney v. Winnebago County Social Services Supreme Court case one must establish the history, examine the case, and explain the future impacts. Establishing the history of DeShaney v. Winnebago County Social Services helps one to better understand the case. In 1980, Randy and Melody DeShaney were granted a divorce, and Randy DeShaney was granted custody of their one-year-old …show more content…

Winnebago County Social Services helps one to recognize the influence it will have on future cases. Randy DeShaney was sent to jail for his actions; however, his time spent in jail was relatively short. Melody DeShaney was granted custody of Joshua, who now suffers permanent brain damage. In 1986 the number of child abuse cases reported doubled. (“The Battered Child” 7) Five years later, in Daniels v. Williams, the Court considered Joshua’s case when deciding, "to the extent that it states that mere lack of due care by a state official may 'deprive ' an individual of life, liberty, or property under the Fourteenth Amendment." (DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services) In Davidson v. Cannon, a case heard immediately after Daniels, the Court reiterated its newfound belief that "where a government official is merely negligent in causing the injury, no procedure for compensation is constitutionally required." (The Battered Child 8) The future impacts of Joshua DeShaney’s case will last a long time, and effect many future cases. In conclusion, after contemplating the cases’ distinctive historical background, the sharply divided arguments that prompted the courts’ ruling, and the wide-reaching impact of that ruling, it is evident that this case was a turning point in American history. Despite differing opinions, the Supreme Court stuck to the Constitution in their decision that the government is not responsible for protecting children from their

Show More
Related
658 Words | 3 Pages

DHS stated, based on the information received they were able to substantiate their findings against Mr. Daniels for sexual abuse, however, their police department and district attorney felt as if they could not get there with criminal charges against Mr. Daniels. A judge in Mecklenberg County awarded Mr. Daniels custody in Mr. and Ms. Daniels custody hearing. DHS sent me the sexual assault examination report from Samuel’s well-child check. This is where DHS was able to substantiate their findings due to Samuel having physical findings consistent with sexual

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

The caregivers lacked commitment, compassion, conscientiousness, fairness and honesty, and if they had taken their jobs seriously probably Tomcik wouldn’t have suffered as much. Trial began on July 22, 1991 and the decision was made on October 7, 1991. Tomcik’s total damage came out to be $85,000 according to the text. The defendants were proven wrong and they were charged. The court did the right thing, but I think a stricter action should have been taken against the defendants.

Read More
1635 Words | 7 Pages

In 2008, Spears was placed into a conservatorship because her family was worried about her mental health. This happened after she had locked herself in a bathroom with her son Jayden because it was time for her to hand him off as she only had a limited time to be with her children. This violates the custody order, which resulted in a 5150, “an emergency psychiatric hold, in which a person having a mental-health episode can be involuntarily hospitalized (Farrow and Tolentino, Britney Spear’s Conservatorship Nightmare, pg. 11).” There were multiple other instances leading up to the conservatorship including public

Read More
2049 Words | 9 Pages

Pursuant to Md. Code (1984, 2014 Repl. Vol., 2015 Suppl.), § 10-222(h)(3) of the State Government Article (“SG”), we may only reverse or modify the decision of an administrative agency if that decision is: (i) unconstitutional; (ii) exceeds the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the final decision maker; (iii) results from an unlawful procedure; (iv) is affected by any other error of law; (v) is unsupported by competent, material, and substantial evidence in light of the entire record as submitted; or (vi) is arbitrary or capricious. SG § 10-222(h)(3). “‘On appellate review of the decision of an administrative agency, this Court reviews the agency’s decision, not the circuit court’s decision.’” Long Green Valley Ass’n v. Prigel Family Creamery, 206 Md. App. 264, 273 (2012) (quoting Halici v. City of Gaithersburg, 180 Md.

Read More
1665 Words | 7 Pages

In 1945, the High Court of Australia heard the case of Gratwick v Johnson and ultimately decided to dismiss the appeal in a unanimous decision by the Judges. While different reasoning was employed, all five judges drew the conclusion that the appeal should be dismissed as the statute the defendant was charged under was inconsistent with s.92 of the Australian Constitution. To provide some context for this case in 1944, Dulcie Johnson was charged with an offence against the National Security Act 1939-1943 in that she did contravene par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order by travelling from South Australia to Western Australia by rail. In brief terms par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order provided that no person shall, without a valid permit, travel from state to state or territory.

Read More
691 Words | 3 Pages

Extent of Maltreatment: The household consist of Shaquana L. Wright 37, (maltreating caregiver/mother), Demecia Harris 4, (victim), and Annie Howard (Grandmother). Shaquana Wright, 37(maltreating caregiver), mother of Demecia does not reside in the home Annie Howard (maternal grandmother/caregiver) but frequently visits the home of to care for the child. The maltreatment addressed in this case is Substance Misuse and Environmental Hazards. The child in the home is functioning normally. Child is not exhibiting hunger issues or looking unkempt.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Rosario”). However, the district court decided that the plaintiff violated the “Confidentiality Act,” which “permits disclosure of confidential communications of a minor between the ages of twelve and eighteen if…the therapist finds disclosure to be in the best interest of the minor” (“Dr. Rosario”). The courts also determined that he violated “The Reporting Act,” which requires school personnel to immediately report suspected child abuse to authorities (“Pesce v. J”). Dr. Pesce also violated the J. Sterling Morton High School District Employment Contract by not promptly reporting the incident, and therefore, putting J.D. in danger. In addition, the courts decided that Pesce’s rights were not violated (“Dr. Rosario”).

Read More
1590 Words | 7 Pages

The case of Cassandra vs Connecticut state is about Cassandra, a teenager from Connecticut, who was diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma, a type of cancer. Cassandra refused to get chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma deeming the treatment itself as poisonous. Casandra’s mother, Jackie Fortin gave up on convincing her daughter to get chemotherapy and respected her decision. So, Cassandra and her mother often missed their medical appointments. Cassandra’s doctor reported Casandra’s mother, Jackie Fortin, to Department of Children and Families for neglecting her child for avoiding cancer treatment which would be highly fatal to Cassandra.

Read More
1007 Words | 5 Pages

The state's decision to take custody of the two teenage children, despite their lack of physical harm, speaks to the imminent danger they face within their own home. The welfare call made by the oldest daughter on Instagram underscores the urgency of the situation and the failure of Child Protective Services (CPS) to intervene sooner. Beyond the realm of social media, S46E22 raises pertinent questions about the criminal justice

Read More
146 Words | 1 Pages

In Wyman v. James, the Supreme Court held that the beneficiary of the Aid to the Families with the Dependent Children must allow a house visit by a case manager, when the law requires it, or relinquish her entitlement to open help. The Supreme Court did not view it as a pursuit in fourth amendment terms. Regardless of the possibility that the visit were a pursuit, the Court said it was sensible: it was made for the advantage of the kid; it was "a gentle means" of guaranteeing that duty stores are appropriately spent; the case manager was not a "uniformed authority"; and the beneficiary had the decision of summoning her entitlement to decline or relinquishing the advantages. Three contradicting Justices (William Douglas, William Brennan, Thurgood

Read More
299 Words | 2 Pages

Mikaela Sinnett’s mother experienced the “the gaze of the state” because she going to raise her child while being blind and therefore considered unable to parent by the state. The state put Mikaela into foster care because of the state's lack of knowledge on ability and the clear discrimination of disabled alternative parenting. The child welfare system intruded on her family by taking away their agency as parents. The system perpetuates ableism and the miseducation that disability is correlated with the mistreatment of children. Angela Frederick managed to parent her two-year-old child by attaching bells to her child's clothing, wearing her baby attached to clothing, and using syringes to measure medicines.

Read More
752 Words | 4 Pages

United States of America vs. Tracy Richardson Brown and Sandra Parkman Thompson. Retrieved from

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

After years of this behavior and her being put into jail for stealing. She was sentence to prison and her boys would become wards of the State of California. Her aunt Darlene decided to apply for custody of her children, this would allow them to stay in the family and give them a safe and loving home to grow up in. Right after Darlene gained

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

In the Supreme Court case New Jersey v. T. L. O., “TLO” (Tracy Lois Odem) had her pursed check by the school’s vice principal because a teacher had caught her smoking inside the girl’s bathroom. TLO then was convicted of dealing and use of illicit drugs discovered during the search. She later fought the search and presented this case to the New Jersey Juvenile Court. The court found her guilty of delinquency, but TLO repealed and the court reversed this decision and asked the Supreme Court to review the case. This case shows how controversial the Fourth Amendment can be but it also reveals that in certain cases that searches against students can be unreasonable and therefore violating their constitutional rights.

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

In conclusion, Justice Stephen Breyer argues that sometimes the government must help parents regulate what their youth are exposed to and that the California law is

Read More

More about Deshaney V. Winnebago Case Analysis

Open Document