ipl-logo

Did The Nuremberg Trials Bring Justice To The Victims Of The Holocaust?

1229 Words5 Pages

Some believe that the Nuremberg Trials brought justice to the victims of the war. The trials did acknowledge the Holocaust, but they were never able to bring righteousness to the victims (Rubenstein). The Boston Globe said in 2015, "It is true that the International Military Tribunal, the first and most widely remembered trial at Nuremberg, focused on the crime of aggression and was not specifically intended to cover the mass murder of the Jews, what we have come to call the Holocaust" (Rubenstein). The main point of the first trial was to bring justness to the Holocaust victims and survivors. The trial acknowledged the events of the Holocaust and condemned 14 defendants to death (Keleher 1139). Despite all of this, justice will never …show more content…

Nikitchenko was one of the Soviet Union 's judges. He had presided over several infamous show trials used by Joseph Stalin to convict his so-called enemies during the Great Purge of 1936 to 1937 (Davenport 59). During these show trials, Stalin would send innocent people to work camps or have them killed (Davenport 59). This does not reflect very well on Nikitchenko 's role and mission in the Nuremberg trials. Nikitchenko 's action to oversee such crimes was very wrong. Now, in 1945 he was serving as a judge to condemn German Nazis for their wrongdoings even though he had witnessed and approved of the killing and torture of innocent citizens. This just contradicts the Nuremberg trial 's mission. The Nuremberg trials were meant to punish Germans and all those who had committed reprehensible acts during the war, but the Allies were not convicted for their crimes (Davenport 141). Because those charges against the Nazis were made following the crimes, it is suspicious that none of the crimes committed by the Allied powers were brought forward. Both sides bombed massive amounts of innocent civilians. A famous instance is when the Allied

Show More
Related
579 Words | 3 Pages

On November 14, 1945, the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials began in Germany. They were to be the definitive judgement of the crimes against humanity by the Nazis. In the midst of the trial, it was determined that the SS, along with its associated organizations such as the Sicherheitsdienst (SD--the security and intelligence organization within the SS) and Geheime Staatspolizei (Gestapo—State Secret Police), was a criminal organization.1 The verdict placed on the SS was as follows:

Read More
624 Words | 3 Pages

Since the Holocaust, the United Nations have made sure to let everyone throughout the world have equal rights. This mass killing of Jews violated every right that they had. They were beaten to death, shot on spot, starved, poorly clothed, et cetera. No one deserves the harsh treatment that they got throughout World War II. Nearly six million Jews died during this regime of a Nazi leader named Hitler.

Read More
102 Words | 1 Pages

By the 1980s, perspectives had changed and legal challenges and policy questions arose about licensing a dam in a national park. After several years of political processes, Congress settled the issue in 1992. According to the Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act (1992), the main purpose of removal of the project dams is for the full restoration of the Elwha River ecosystem and native anadromous fisheries. The consideration for acquisition of the Projects shall be $29.5 million and no more, to be paid by the Secretary to the owner and local industrial consumer (Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act,

Read More
323 Words | 2 Pages

Millions of people through history have been treated unfairly. During WWII, the Holocaust was one of the greatest atrocities of all time. People were also wrongly accused and punished during the witch trials in Salem that occurred during the 1600s. these two events have differences but they also have similarities as well.

Read More
1214 Words | 5 Pages

The trial covered the three main factors of denying the Holocaust. The biggest accusations claim was that there was no proof of the Nazi’s having an organized plan to eliminate Jews, that there was no proof that Hitler ordered the extermination or did not know of the extermination of Jews, and that no Jews were killed with the use of gas chambers. He believed specifically that no Jew was ever murdered by gassing at the Auschwitz extermination camp. The trial began in January of 2000 and ended, with a judgment strongly in favor of Lipstadt and her publisher, in April of that year. The purpose of the trial was for Irving to gain his credibility back.

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

According to the document 25-3, “The Holocaust: A Journalist Reports on Nazi Massacres of Jews, the massacre of the Jews,” the Holocaust, affected not only Jews, but it also affected the United States. The writer of the Journalist reports, Varian Fry, offers possible responses to the Holocaust by the United States and its allies. However, most citizens in Allied countries did not believe the Holocaust, and their governments were optimistic about solving this problem. As a journalist who saw what is really happening in the Germany, he criticizes how reluctant the Allies are. The document suggests not only the United States needed to recognize the fact that Jews were suffering from the Nazis, but it also shows that the entire world needed to accept that there was a such massacre.

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

Trial Decision This trial of President Harry S Truman attempts to malign him as a war criminal after the role he played in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As Commander in Chief during World War II, President Truman made the final decision in whether the atomic bombs should or should not be dropped to put an end to Japanese resistance and bring the second world war to a close. It is being called into question whether the Japanese’s unwillingness to surrender called for such a severe response from the United States.

Read More
475 Words | 2 Pages

The holocaust was not just about the slaughtering of jews is about riding the world of its imperfections. According to Hitler these “imperfections” included being jewish, having anything but blonde hair and blue eyes, being handicapped mentally or physically, or being homosexual. During the holocaust jews human natural rights were violated in several different ways. There is a document that states all of the human rights. You would think that people are able to use their common sense to be able to determine that

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

Memory and history have always shared a part in creating an individuals perception of themselves, their lives, and of their importance. The Holocaust was a mass murder of millions that took place in the mid 1940’s, that changed the lives of so many. ("The Holocaust") Night, is a memoir by Elie Wiesel that describes his experience as a teenager struggling to survive in concentration camps during the Holocaust. (Wiesel, 2006)

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

The Salem Witch Trials and The Holocaust are two past events that are commonly known and remembered today for the prosecution of many innocent deaths. These two took place in different areas as well as different time periods but are still comparable in numerous ways with the death tolls, the people who took leadership, and the way it affects history today for example. The Holocaust is known for the five to six million jews that were burned, shot, hung, or even experimented on (www.history.com). Several different individuals were punished for unique characteristics (Wiesel,).

Read More
924 Words | 4 Pages

It is estimated around 6 million Jews died during the Holocaust, each death leaving a scar on modern history, each death showing the monsters we all can be to our own people, or just revealing the monsters we truly are. Harsh changes were put on the Jews from the loss of basic human rights like freedom to the loss of lives. This inhumane treatment was done by their own kind, no sympathy, no empathy,

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

Many of the accused got sentenced to life in prison or death. Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment to explain the correlation of the environmental aspects that make people do terrible things and how far people will go to harm others. Social pressures also play a big role in how people think. Minorities can have their ideas of what is right and what is wrong swept over by majorities which was displayed in Solomon Asch’s experiments. The most important thing to learn from the Nuremburg trials, Milgram’s experiment, and Asch’s experiment is that sometimes it is better to resist authority if it means following moral

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

The United States, Canada, Australia and England all took displaced people. They also took in many who were implicated in other Nazi Crimes (Nuremburg Trials). The Nuremberg trials were controversial even among those who wanted the major criminals punished. Harlan Stone, chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court at the time, described the proceedings as a “sanctimonious fraud” and a “high-grade lynching party.” William O’ Douglas, then an associate U.S. Supreme Court justice, said the Allies “substituted power for principle” at Nuremberg (Nuremburg Trials).

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

Source one exhibits that Nazi war criminals being punished “sends a powerful message about the importance of holding genocidists accountable” (Article 1). This illustrates that the prosecution of Nazis is crucial to showing what is right and what is wrong. Along with this, article two demonstrates the same concept by including the fact that these trials are a way to show victims and survivors that we are helping them seek justice. By putting these Nazi criminals up to be punished, we are showing that we are not going to let these horrible happenings occur

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

Otto Adolf Eichmann was one of the most important members of the Nazi Party who was accused of crimes against the Jewish people and humanity during World War 2. After the war, he went to Argentina to escape prosecution but was captured there by Israeli agents and was transferred to Israel to be judged. During the trial, Eichmann’s defense was based on Kant’s duty-based ethical theory and categorical Imperative since he overstated many times that he was only following orders. By enouncing Kantian ethical theory, Eichmann acquitted himself from moral guilt. Kant’s categorical imperative as known as The Formula Of The End

Read More

More about Did The Nuremberg Trials Bring Justice To The Victims Of The Holocaust?

Related Topics

Open Document