Manchester State Park, Kitsap Peninsula, Washington: West Beach Outcrop Geology Jason Ott The west beach at Manchester State Park consists of roughly 200m of exposed outcrops with well bedded strata of consisting of the Blakeley formation, of Oligocene age, and poorly consolidated beds of Quaternary age. The northern boundary of the area of interest begins at the southern edge of Middle Point and area terminates at Clam Bay to the south. The Blakeley formation consists of alternating sequence of coarse sandstones, mudstones, and sub-rounded/brecciated conglomerates.
In order to make Yuma a safer place to farm and to live the,Hoover Dam was needed to be built. Without the YCWUA, Yuma County Water Users’ Association, the Hoover dam wouldn’t have been built to control the water flow. Yuma would still have flooding regularly and we wouldn’t have the agriculture that we do today. “It wasn’t until Hoover Dam was built in the 1930s that the river was controlled and the valley and city were protected, he said. “Hoover wasn’t part of the Yuma Project, but it influenced it.”
For decades, there has been tension between Native American fishermen and non-native fishermen over the fishing rights on Mille Lacs Lake. This tension has increased, particularly because of the sustainability and quality of Mille Lacs Lake, and the Supreme Court’s ruling in Minnesota against Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians. The Court claimed that the Chippewa Indians retained their rights to hunt and fish on ceded lands as established by the 1837 Treaty of St. Peters. Usufruct rights are rights of enjoyment to another’s property allowing the holder to generate income from the property without obtaining ownership. This right to hunt and fish on ceded lands is further protected from state regulation by the 1837 Treaty of St. Peters.
Pearl Woodrum saw her fears realized when the dam burst in 1972. As the residents of Buffalo Creek slept soundly in their beds, they would not be able to envision the horrors that would occur on that dreary February morning. They knew that any time there was a substantial amount of rainfall in Buffalo Creek, the creek would rise and the lack of an early warning system meant they might never know if a heavy rain heralded disaster until it was too late. Residents also knew that the dam was not stable, a fact the U.S. Geological Survey confirmed when it concluded that the dam was “basically stable but could be overtopped and breached.” William Davies was the federal geologist who conducted the study and stated that if the dam broke, “flood and debris would damage a church and two or three houses downstream, cover the road and wash out the railroad.”
In the 1800s, the first national debate occurred over the idea of damming Hetch Hetchy. The two sides include Preservationists who wanted to preserve Hetch Hetchy and Conservationist who believed that we should take advantage of the resources Hetch Hetchy provides. This created conflicts between the Conservationists and the Preservationists over the thought of building a dam in Hetch Hetchy. However, the Preservationists ultimately failed to convince Congress to stop the damming of the Hetch Hetchy due the ability to make money off the reservoir and the resources Hetch Hetchy provides that would benefit the people of San Francisco. This is proven through several of documents written by Gifford Pinchot and John Raker, San Francisco District
Located in the beautiful state of Wyoming, the Grand Teton mountain is the tallest peak of the Teton Range. Touching the sky at 13,775 feet, the Grand Teton is only half the height of Mount Everest but still possesses the power to take your breath away. Day 1 - Snake River Rafting My first day in visiting Grand Teton National Park will be a day of great relaxation.
The tribe still uses some of the settlement water to runoff to restore wetlands along the river. He believes that some members deserved more than 650,000 acre-feet, he thought that it wasn’t fair that they only agreed because they were afraid of the possibility of losing their case in
The authors of each article tackle the daunting task of representing the Indian Removal Act, the Trail of Tears, and president Andrew Jacksons approach, appropriately while also including their own personal opinions. They also must back up their points with fact and reason. Each author has a unique opinion compared to the others, and when read all together, provide a better understanding from multiple sides and sources. The question the authors debate is whether Andrew Jackson was justified in his removal of Native Americans by use of the Indian Removal Act of 1830. Was he protecting the safety of the Native Americans by moving them, or was he only progressing the agenda of the white man?
Using the Antiquities Act of 1906, Clinton declared 3 million acres “national monuments” including Utah’s Grand Staircase-Escalante, Arizona’s Grand Canyon-Parashant, and California’s pinnacles (Wapner, 2001). Other measures to protect land include using executive power to put one-third of national forest land off limits to road building, logging, and oil and gas exploration which effectively protected all remaining national forest land that hadn’t already been developed or given permanent protection, including the Tongass National Forest in Alaska (Wapner, 2001). Clinton also enacted efforts to restore the Everglades, restricted flights over the Grand Canyon, banned snowmobiling in national parks, and fought against congressional efforts to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and
Even though the section goes on to say that if an Indian is occupying the said construction area, they will “be supplied with sufficient quantity of water for irrigating and domestic purposes,” I still don’t believe that it is fair because the construction is disrupting their daily lives; they also didn’t have a say in if they wanted a pipe there in the first place (Blum, Gjerde, and Hoffman, 47). All in all, I believe this act during the Reconstruction period was a failure in the sense of inconsideration. Although I believe that the Reconstruction era had many failures, it would be biased to say
As Kitson (2009) notes, "the hydropower projects, in many ways, represented a new form of colonization, as indigenous peoples were excluded from the decision-making process and bore the brunt of the social and environmental impacts of the dams" (p. 630). This lack of consultation and collaboration with Native American communities during the planning and approval of hydropower projects has been a significant challenge in mitigating their impacts. In fact, as Deloria and Lytle (2011) explain, "the United States government, which had a trust responsibility to protect tribal lands and resources, had approved the dam without consulting the tribal nations that would be most affected by it" (p.
These issues can still improve through cooperation and understanding, however, and reaching a satisfactory decision about the Dakota Access Pipeline provides a perfect gateway to uplifting improvement of the reservations’ lifestyle. If the government agrees to give a little, a great opportunity arises for them to get a little as well. In the last decades, lack of funding has led to blatantly subpar education for the majority of Native American students, even when the government made an attempt to intervene due to an understandable inherent distrust of Government interference. Through a monumental compromise via the Dakota Access Pipeline, the government could prove its decency, transparency, and trustworthiness, which would advance the relationship of Native Americans and the United States Government brilliantly. The newfound trust could easily apply to areas such as financial welfare, educational support, and government-run health clinics.
They could divert the flow of water to their property, even if it disrupted the neighbor 's land and destroyed their crops. This eventually led to the establishment of the Canal Board. The board was specifically designed to issues regarding the state’s artificial waterways. The board made most of the decisions about At times the average citizen considered only the negative side of having a canal and neglected the benefits which accrued in having an expanded market. Many of the people who didn’t feel as if their claims for property damage were taken seriously, turn to the state as an advocate.
As we look around there is much concern about the waste of America, how it is disposed, what affect it has on the environment today and the future. Although technology has advanced from what we once used to deposal of waste, there is still much concern. Even though we use garbage grinders, compaction trucks and pneumatic collection systems, we have noticed that using open dumping and improper incineration of solid waste is having a huge impact on pollution issues and health issue to mankind. There are different categories of how waste is determined.
To put it simply, commons is defined as “land and resources belonging to or affecting the whole of a community” (Oxford Dictionary, 2018). The two key characteristics of a commons is that it is hard to exclude others from using it and it is subtractable, meaning it has finite quantity and declines through use/over time (Thorn, 2018). These characteristics can be related not directly to the dams but to the rivers they dam. For example, the Elwha River as shown in the film. Historically, the river was of great importance to the native Elwha tribe due to the fact salmon were an important part of their lifestyle and the river was an essential part of their spiritual heritage (Gowan et al., 2006).
