ipl-logo

Did The Supreme Court Influence America

1333 Words6 Pages

The Supreme Court plays an important role in our government today. The courts perform several actions, such as making the final decision for many government policies. They interpret laws created by other government branches, and they make important policy making decisions in order to please the public and make America a better place. The Supreme Court is pressured to make better decisions because their power allows them to influence America. Even though the Supreme Court has several different powers, the courts cannot enforce its will at all times because some of their rulings can and will be overturned (Marshall, Curry, and Pacelle 3). Despite this, the courts do their best to make America a better place by using all of its powers given …show more content…

The answer to this question is yes, and there are many reasons as to why. One reason the courts have an effect on politics and America is because of their constitutional and implied powers. In “The Initiation of Supreme Court Communication Marbury vs. Madison,” it is stated that “the contemporary Supreme Court has the power and the ability to intervene in any aspect of American life it deems to lie within its jurisdictional reach” (Charles 39). As shown, the Supreme Court can decide whether to interpret any of the people’s problems and determine whether they should be taken to court. This power that the Supreme Court has, as well as the implied power of judicial review for any type of government action, came through the case known as Marbury vs. Madison (Marshall, Curry, and Pacelle 3). The important powers that came after Marbury vs. Madison, such as interpreting a person’s problem and judicial review, show that the Supreme Court really does affect the political process. In fact, once judicial review came into effect, the whole system of government changed. Before judicial review came into play with the help of John Marshall, the legislative branch or executive branch could create a law without interference. However, once judicial review came into play with the help of John Marshall, the legislative branch and executive branch were forced to see whether the Supreme Court would approve of their suggested laws and bills (Edwards III, Wattenburg, and Lineburry

Show More
Related
1023 Words | 5 Pages

When people think of how government works, unless they’ve taken a government class, they usually think of Congress making laws and the President doing pretty much everything else. No one pays much attention to the Supreme Court unless there is a landmark case or something else to grab the news — like the recent death of Justice Antonin Scalia. But the Supreme Court does much more than you’d think regarding keeping the political machine running like a well-oiled … machine. Through not only interpretation of the law, but also judicial activism, the Supreme Court shows it can have as much influence over the laws of the land as either of the other branches of the federal government. In this paper, I will analyze the decision-making methods of the Court using the cases of Gideon v. Wainwright and Betts v. Brady.

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

The judicial review process is an important aspect of the US Court system. The process involves the use of powers by the Federal Courts to void the congress' acts that direct conflict with the Constitution. The Marbury v. Madison is arguably the landmark case that relates to Judicial Review. The Marbury v. Madison case was written in the year 1803 by the Chief Justice at that time named John Marshall. Thomas Jefferson won an election on the Democratic - Republican Party that had just been formed creating a panicky political atmosphere having defeated John Adams of the previous ruling party.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

Marbury v Madison The case of Marbury v. Madison will always be considered one of the most important cases ever decide by the Supreme Court. The Court’s ruling has been discussed and examined by many law scholars throughout the world. This essay summarizes the case and explains the implications of it regarding the powers of the Judicial Branch.

Read More
646 Words | 3 Pages

In both the McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden cases, John Marshall asserted the power of judicial review, and legitimatized the Supreme Court within the national government. The Marshall Court, over the span of thirty years, managed to influence the life of every American by aiding in the development of the judicial branch and establishing a boundary between the state and national government. John Marshall’s Supreme Court cases shaped how the government is organized today. He strongly believed in Federalism, and that the national government should be sovereign, rather than the states. The Supreme Court under John

Read More
811 Words | 4 Pages

John Marshall had a significant impact on strengthening the national government during his term as Chief Justice from 1800-1830. Marshall achieved this goal by strengthening the power of the Supreme Court in three main court cases. In Marbury v. Madison Marshall established the practice of judicial review, then in McCulloch v. Maryland he weakened the central government and Gibbons v. Ogden provided the federal government with the ability to regulate interstate commerce. Marbury v. Madison (1803) was a court case that began the practice of judicial review. This case started because the night before President John Adams term ended, he appointed 42 justices of the peace.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

On the other hand, Marshall ruled the Judiciary Act of 1789 to be “an unconstitutional extension of judiciary power into the realm of the executive” (Marbury v. Madison, history.com). In spite of settling this dispute, ultimately, the Supreme Court elevated and contributed to its power by establishing its right to judicial review of laws made by Congress, that power not implicitly included in the Constitution beforehand (Marbury v. Madison, www.inspireeducators.com). All things considered, the Marbury v. Madison case granted the Supreme Court of the United States (S.C.O.T.U.S.) the power of judicial review, therefore allowing the Court to declare laws passed by Congress to be unconstitutional. This had and still has a tremendous and significant impact on the United States because if not for it, the laws passed could not be declined or conferred further about, or in other words, struck down and reviewed. Our judicial system would be limited.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

The Judicial Branch is the judge of any laws that the President or Congress passes, they decide if the law goes along with the Constitution. Without this system our government would fall into a complete disaster and most likely become a dictatorship. Given these points, it is obvious that the power in our government needs to be

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

The Marbury v. Madison in 1803 was a stepping stone for the Supreme Court. The Judiciary Act initiated by Congress allowed the Supreme Court to issue certain judicial writs. When President Jefferson took office, he ordered his Secretary of State James Madison not to deliver the commissions. One of the appointees William Marbury, then petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ. As a result of Marshall’s decision to follow orders, Marbury was denied the commission.

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

Another example of this is was the Supreme Court’s decision that made the federal government’s authority more powerful than state governments. This was seen in the court case of Marbury vs. Madison. Political parties also began to change at this time. For example, new political parties, such as the Democrats, led by Jackson, and Whigs,

Read More
401 Words | 2 Pages

[I think that the supreme court has the most power according to the constitution.] [The first reason why I think this is because they decide if laws for the people are constitutional and the laws that the president make. “They have the power to settle disagreements about the meaning of laws This quote backs me up because it explains how if they don’t like a law that is about to be passed and they think that it isn’t a good law for the people then they will disagree with that law and it wouldn’t be passed.”]

Read More
565 Words | 3 Pages

With this power, the judiciary has the ability to "check" the actions of their fellow branches, the executive and legislative branches. Judicial review was interpreted from the judges' understanding of the Constitution. This power impacts American citizens profoundly. Now, the courts have the right to overturn laws when they are presented in court. For example, in the case

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

Although the constitution establishes the supreme court,it permits congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the judiciary act of 1789. This act created a supreme court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system(About supreme court...). As a general rule, the supreme court and the social policies are more close on the social services and justification of

Read More
1703 Words | 7 Pages

The Supreme Court does have too much power for an unelected body. It is true that the power to reinterpret the Constitution in the light of changing societal needs can amount to the power to amend the Constitution but they are subjected to checks by Congress and by the president. The House of Representatives can impeach justices and the Senate, try them and if found guilty by a two-thirds majority, remove them from office. Congress also has the power to initiate constitutional amendments, thereby seeking to overturn judgments of the Court with which it disagrees. They also have the power to alter the number of justices on the Court, the Supreme Court has no say in this whatsoever and therefore does not have the huge amount of power that it is accused of

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

The Supreme Court has an exceptional part to play in the United States course of action of government. The Constitution gives it the capacity to check, if principal, the exercises of the President and Congress. It can tell a President that his exercises are not allowed by the Constitution. It can uncover to Congress that a law it passed neglected the U.S. Constitution and is, along these lines, no longer a law. It can in like manner tell the organization of an express that one of its laws mollifies an oversee up the Constitution.

Read More
1462 Words | 6 Pages

If the constitution says that other branches of the government have discretion to deal with an issue, the courts will not review such so called political questions. e.g., the courts have not reviewed such so called political questions. For example, the courts have no authority to overturn the President’s decision to pardon a felon since the constitution provides that the right to pardon is an executive

Read More

More about Did The Supreme Court Influence America

Related Topics

Open Document