Difference Between Neehring And Sherman Alexie

190 Words1 Pages
Both Cristina Nehring and Sherman Alexie recognize that reading can be lucrative activity. However, Nehring and Alexie differ on why, and in what circumstances, reading is a beneficial investment of time. Nehring’s article faults society for exaggerating the intellectual advantage of casual reading. She writes that there are “two very different ways to use books”, with one-way superior to the other. She also argues against idealizing books and using them as “intellectual support”. On the contrary, Alexie describes being inspired by his father’s passion for literacy. Through his father’s diverse selection of books, ranging in topic from “gangster epics” to the Kennedy assassination, Alexie learned to defy expectation. His underprivileged youth,