Australia and nazi Germany are very different in terms of rights, how they act, etc.
But in terms of government, it is pretty similar.
They both have a head of State, branches of government, and levels of government. But nazi Germany is a totalitarian Dictatorship and Australia is a Representative Democracy and Constitutional Monarchy. Australia’s government does multiple things that protect Australia and its rights. Germany, on the other hand, Germany’s government does something close to that but it is unjust and unfair, one man can control those branches unlike Australia, where one person can’t control it, therefore making it fair. Structure-wise, they are not far apart, Australia is led by a Governor General, then the Senate (Upper-house), after so is the House of Representatives (Lower-House), then the people of Australia. Germany on the other hand, It’s led by the Fuhrer (or der Führer und Reichskanzler), after that, it is Reich
…show more content…
With the separation of power, Australia is more just. By having three branches of government, The Executive, Judicial, and Legislative. The executive branch puts laws into power through government agencies and enforces them, the judicial branch takes the laws and interprets and carries out judgment to individuals who disobey or corrupt them, and the legislative branch makes the laws for people to follow and obey (including the politicians). Germany on the other hand, had two branches, the legislative and judicial. Both of them hold unjust power, the judicial branch does not fully create laws, they only enforce them on the individuals who break them playing as a people’s court, the legislative is