Even though both John Locke (1632-1734) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) were members of the modern social contract theory that promote rational thought and freedom as an important component in the political community, there are many contradictions in their thoughts and views on education. Below is a comparison between the views of John Locke and Jean Rousseau on early childhood education (0-8 years). Both Locke and Rousseau do not agree on the use of naturalism and social habits and conventions for the education of children. They believe that there is a natural tendency in each individual including personality likes and dislikes of a child against something. However, there are also significant differences between Locke and Rousseau …show more content…
Moral authority and discipline ingredients is not required in the early development of children's character and reputation as fertilizer is not necessary in the natural development of a child. They will develop according to the natural tendencies and become masters of their own when the greater. In addition, they are able to observe and develop natural habit that is in itself. Children should be given the freedom to learn through their senses in exploring the natural world. Therefore, children should be given the opportunity to learn to appreciate the natural senses and feelings that are available to them even if they had been able to think rationally. Natural education can produce people who can adapt to the environment, has a good temperament and love. Locke believes the ultimate goal of education is a human child who can serve in the community and contribute to the development of the country in the future. Therefore, to give birth to children who are able to serve in the community and bring prosperity and dignity to the country in the future, they must have a certain character, a noble, farsighted and have a deep knowledge of politics. So, parents play an important role to educate their children in order to include the features that are required to be a useful, virtuous and capable to reap their obligations to the family, nation and