The Constitution was far superior to the Articles of Confederation because, the Articles of Confederation had fewer powers than the Constitution. Also, the Constitution created a balance in the government that the Articles of Confederation did not. Lastly, the Constitution took everyones thoughts into consideration. The Articles of Confederation did not include as many powers as the Constitution did. In the political cartoon it showed all the powers that the Constitution included that the Articles of Confederation discluded.
Under the Articles of Confederation, separation of powers represent the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit each one branch from exercising the fundamental functions of three branches known as the Executive Branch Legislative Branch, Judicial Branch. Another principle that was applied differently was Federalism. Federalism means that thereis a division of power between a central government and regional governments Under the Articles of Confederation, Federalism shares power bounded by state and National government Under the Constitution, Federalism however is shared by state, national, and federal power Lastly, Checks and Balances was another principle applied differently under the Articles of Confederation
Compare and contrast the constitution The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was called to revise the ailing Articles of Confederation. The Constitution has similarities and differences to the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was made of a one body Government, that only allowed states to have one vote to select a representative. The Congress can make laws but cannot enforce them, and congress were not allowed to tax the people.
Articles of Confederation and The Constitution Articles of Confederation and The Constitution are two very known constitutions the United States have operated under. The Articles of Confederation was the first in effect from March 1, 1781. Then came the second constitution known as The Constitution, whom replaced the Article of Confederation due to when it was ratified by New Hampshire on June 21, 1788. The two constitutions have few similarities, but various differences.
But beyond these general features, the two constitutions could not be more different. These differences result from the fact that the two documents arose out of very different historical circumstances and for radically opposite complaints with the document each was meant to replace. With the U.S. Constitution, the problem with the earlier Articles of Confederation was that government was too decentralized and not powerful enough. The U.S. Constitution was designed to overcome these weaknesses and offer a degree of centralization and increased government power.
The new government, the Constitution, is now able to enforces taxes, which allowed money to come in and the government was able to pay off their debt. One other weakness of the articles was that it gave all power to only one house of representative from each state, the constitution try to solve this matter that creating three separate branches of power, the Legislative branch, Executive branch, and the Judiciary branch, allowing the power to be more divided. Representation was another problem in under the Articles of Confederation because a big state like Massachusetts and a small state like New Jersey both have the same amount of representatives, the Constitution made a compromise by forming two house in Congress the Senate, where each state get equal representation, and the House of Representatives, where each state is represented by the population of the state. The Constitution also fixed the problem of passing a law; under the Articles of Confederation, laws can only be passed if 9 out of 13 representatives agrees on the law because of this not much laws were passed, now under the Constitution only 51 percent of the votes to pass the law. From this readers can infer that the Constitution fixed many of the defects in the Articles
The Articles of Confederation was an agreement among the thirteen original states of the United States that served as the first constitution. The Articles had first been introduced by Richard Henry Lee in the Second Continental Congress. Although the Articles of Confederation has made its contributions throughout history, the Articles, however, did not last very long and had been proven inadequate from the very start. I agree with this statement based on the examples and analysis of the Constitution I will soon provide. The Articles of Confederation were written during a time when the American people feared a strong national government.
The Articles of Confederation vs The Constitution When the idea of replacing the Articles of Confederation was introduced to the American citizens, there were many different reactions to it. People got in lots of debates associated with the idea of the Constitution. After winning Independence against Great Britain on July 4, 1776 Americans created the Articles of Confederation as a form of national government and established their own state governments as well. After many years of having the Articles of Confederation as the source of government for the thirteen states, problems started to arise and people started to see the weaknesses in the Articles. Eventually some of the citizens wanted to revise the Articles of Confederation.
Articles of Confederation and The Constitution The United States Constitution was brought about in 1787 and for the next 230 years this document would be the bread and butter of this country. The Supreme court continually interprets the Constitution so as to reflect a rapidly changing world, its basic tenets have remained virtually unchanged since its inception, and unchallenged as well. (Constitutionfacts.com, n.a.). As great as the constitution is now, how it came to be is a big importance to United States of America’s history. The United States fought for their independence from Great Britain.
In one hand, the Articles of Confederation had a weak central government, differing form the strong central government in the Constitution. The Constitution’s government had a structure of three different branches; the legislative, executive, and judicial branch; unlike the Articles of Confederation that had no structure whatsoever. The Articles of Confederation had many problems like, the poor international trade, poor foreign relations and a weak economy in contrast to the Constitution that only had one problem, the struggle over the ratification. the Articles of Confederation achieved the Northwest Ordinance and the Northwest Territory and according to a history website, the Constitution achieved that we had a system of checks and balances, that we had a bill of rights, and, eventually, the survival of a bloody civil war intact. Lastly, the Constitution had three compromises: the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise and the Slave Trade compromise.
Articles of Confederation vs. the Constitution The intent the framers had of the executive was reflected in the Articles of Confederation. There were several problems with the Articles of Confederation, that Han and Heith mentioned in chapter two of “Presidents and the American Presidency, due to a lack of insight and political effectiveness. Since, the document did not allocate a head of state it caused the articles of confederation to be extremely weak. The confederation could not enforce laws, coordinate national defense, or handle foreign affairs.
The most important difference between these documents was that the Articles of Confederation gave very little power to a central government and the Constitution created a strong central government. The Article of Confederation was written to unite states after the American Revolution. People had the fear of the government having too much power. This document established
The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.
Articles of Confederation vs. U.S. Constitution The Articles of the Confederation and the U.S. Constitution are two articles that where written and accepted by the United States as a foundation for their new government. They are both very important documents that have similarities and differences. Some of the main things the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution have in common is that they addressed the needs of its constituencies.
To analyze the both sides of the articles, ¨The Articles of Confederation¨ and ¨The U.S. Constitution¨. They have many similarities and differences within the two. The U.S. Constitution was adopted in September 1787. The Articles of Confederation was adopted on November 15, 1777. The similarities between the two is that they both have a Congress that can make laws, as it says in ¨The Constitution of the United States of America¨ in article 1 it states ¨All making powers are given to a Congress¨.
