ipl-logo

Differences Between Western Empire And Charlemagne

958 Words4 Pages

Change is not always the easiest thing in life. Change is even harder when it directly affects people’s lives. This is the case with the Eastern Empire. Many new emperors were coming into power and making changes. Some rulers made small changes and some made larger ones like Justinian and Charlemagne. There were many differences between the rulers as well as the Western and Eastern Empire. There were also similarities between them. Both Empires had values that were important to them. Justinian and Charlemagne also had things that they valued in their Empire.
The Western Empire ended and created the Eastern Empire otherwise known as the Byzantine Empire. The Western Empire ended after being conquered many times before it finally became the Byzantine …show more content…

Charlemagne’s goal was to become the king of the Franks, but he wanted to become a universal leader as well; an emperor over all the people (310). Charlemagne used the church to help him receive the publicity that he wanted. He was a much different ruler compared to Justinian. Once Charlemagne was crowned an Emperor he could sense his plan coming into reality. Charlemagne also wanted to a loyal group of followers but never could seem to find a faithful administration. Charlamange also had a love for learning and created a great school inside the palace not just for himself but the benefit of his royal workers and his sons later on. Also built during the reign of Charlemagne was a system that separated people based on the land they owned. The lowest members were called serf. These members had given up their land to another owner in return for assistance. The members of the community that had control over the farms were the manors. Typically the serfs gave up their land to work for a landowner so that they could have a place to live. If a lord had a church on their property, they had the choice of what to do with it. Many of them used their serfs as “serf priests” so that they could still work and give a sermon once a week. Religion to Charlemagne was important to him. According to the text book, The Heritage of World Civilizations, “Charlemagne shared many of the religious beliefs of his ordinary subjects” (Craig et al the 314). Charlemagne knew he was the king but also knew that he did share similar opinions with his people and that the people were essential to his

Open Document