ipl-logo

Character Analysis: Thank You For Arguing

722 Words3 Pages

Summer Reading Assignment Jay Heinrichs in the novel Thank You For Arguing, asserts the reader that every argument has three basic steps: simulating the audience’s emotions, changing the audience’s opinion, and getting the audience to do or choose something. Heinrichs supports his assertion by defining the three types of argument... The Greek Philosopher Aristotle determined the three kinds of argument as forensic argument (which deals with balme and takes place mostly in past tense), demonstrative argument (which deals with values and morals and usually takes place in the present tense), and finally deliberative argument (which deals with choices and decision making and usually takes place in the future tense). The …show more content…

Heinrichs supports his claim by stating, “The second characteristic of ethos, virtue, also has its disconnects, and it makes an especially good lie detector. Aristotle lets you put up a red flag even if you don’t know the person, even while he talks. The secret lies on Aristotle’s defintion of virtue ‘A state of character concerned with choice, lying in a mean’... And you can use it to enhance your own reputation as well as evaluate the character of another person,” (Heinrichs 176). The author’s purpose is to describe the benefits of using ethos’ characteristic of virtue in order to make an argument more credible. The author writes in a professional tone for the writer of an argumentative essay to use ethos’considerable benefits. In conclusion, Jay Heinrichs, the author of Thank You for Arguing, uses many different argument tactics that can make or break an argument. He explains the use of ethos, pathos, and logos and how they can make an argument much stronger. The author explains the use of seduction and disconnects as well as stating, “Never argue

Open Document