ipl-logo

Different Types Of Government Power In The United States

911 Words4 Pages

For the United States, the best form of government is a Federal, Representative, Presidential Democracy. We’ve had this form or government since as long as we can remember, why change it now? My grandpa always said, “If it ain’t broke, don’t try to fix it.” So why would we want to change something that’s been working for so long?
The federal type of government power has been used in the United States since 18th century. It allows laws to be passed at a Federal District (Washington D.C) but it also allows states to experiment with their own types of laws too. For example: When Colorado passed a law that legalized Marijuana, that was the state's decisions that is only for their state. It didn’t have to be passed by the president. With the passing …show more content…

In a unity form of government laws are made in one place and enforced throughout the country. For example: Great Britain makes laws in London and they are the same everywhere. This form is very consistent and not confusing to the people, but it also limits the trying of new things/experimentation like federal does. A confederation is an alliance of independent states, who have a government that only handles certain matters that the member states allow them too. The government does not make laws for the individual. The states help in matters of common concern but are separate. (For example: The Soviet Union) The downfall of this form is that each state would basically be their own country, if you live in one and then move to another, laws and life would be totally different. You also depend on an alliance with the others states, which could cause problems like it did with the Confederate States of America …show more content…

In a presidential government has the executive and legislative branches powers are separate. Both branches are independent and equal. With a presidential government the people elect a chief executive called the President. The president holds offices for a fixed amount of time, and has broad powers that are not controlled by the legislative. When compared with a parliamentary, the executive branch also known as the government has a prime minister, who is appointed by the legislative (Parliament). The legislative controls the executive, with 80% more power. A presidential form is best because all branches are equal and they all have to work together to get things done. This also means that it’s harder to get stuff done, like passing laws. With parliamentary laws get passed, fast! But, the legislative basically has all control, they chose who they want to be prime minister and they could have a majority “vote of no confidence” where the government would have to resign, at any point in time. A parliamentary form just wouldn't work in the United States, sometimes passing law slowly is better then way too

Show More
Related
807 Words | 4 Pages

This specific system of government is described by the 21st Century American Government and Politics textbook as, “The allocation of powers and responsibilities among national, state, and local governments and the intergovernmental relations between them.” When deciding whether the Framers intended for federal or state governments to be supreme in the federal system, a divided answer among the Founders surfaces. If one was to present this question to Alexander Hamilton and his fellow Federalists, he would undoubtedly express his support for a strong federal government. Conversely, Thomas Jefferson and the anti-federalists were in favor of state government supremacy in the federal system and even resented the ratification of the Constitution.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

Federalism makes both central and state governments more equal in power. Source 2 explains how central and state governments are different, though also what common powers they have. This showing how the national government isn't too strong but also the state government is not too strong as well. Meaning both governments have powers and share powers but not too much, this protecting against tyranny. Source 1 states “In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments [state and federal],” Therefore state and national governments are suppose to be different and do different governments so they can check one another and share

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism breaks apart the powers given to the central (Federal) government and those powers given to the states. As seen in document A1, a source from James Madison from Federalist Paper #51, 1788; Madison states, “In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments, and the portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments.” This idea from Madison is the idea of the division of power between the Federal Government and State Governments. Federalism provides a “Double security,” that protects the rights of the citizens of the United States of America. As the governments will be controlled by itself, the separate governments will also control each other.

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism means the power is shared between the National and State Government. In the Federalist Paper #51, written by James Madison in 1788 it states the powers given to the central government(regulate trade,conduct foreign relationships, provide an army and navy,declare war, print and coin money,set up post offices, make immigration laws), the powers given to the states(set up local governments, hold elections, establish schools,pass marriage and divorce laws, regulate in- state businesses, and powers shared(tax,borrow money,set up courts,make laws, enforce laws)(Doc A). This document gives it so both Central Government and States can both make laws also one government can not be stronger than the other which prevents

Read More
1175 Words | 5 Pages

Though there were separate sets of powers granted to the Central Government and separate sets of powers granted to the States, there were still powers that were shared among the two groups. These shared powers were the ability to tax, borrow money, set up courts, make laws, and enforce laws. The powers given to the central government were the ability to regulate trade, conduct foreign relations, provide an army and navy, declare war, print and coin money, set up post offices, and make immigration laws. On the other hand, the powers granted to the states were the ability to set up local governments, hold elections, establish schools, pass marriage and divorce laws, and regulate in-state business. As stated by one of our founding fathers, James Madison, “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself (Federalist Paper #51).”

Read More
1689 Words | 7 Pages

The national government helps bring us all together to make decisions. Federalism gives every level of government their own control over certain aspects of our government. It allows different states with different needs to have laws suited for their people, while still giving us the strong central government that we need. Federalism gives the people more opportunities to meet with leaders and to get more involved in the government. We need a strong central government because they give us protection.

Read More
1823 Words | 8 Pages

This country was founded with the attempt to separate the federal government and the state government, known as federalism. The goal of federalism is to divide the power of state and federal governments, protect the rights of the state, and prevent tyranny of the majority. Throughout the years, federalism turned into dual federalism where the state and federal government were completely independent of each other and only shared a dependency on the Constitution. The united states suppressing now to cooperative federalism, the national government has assumed even more power, overruling the states with Supreme Court decisions and actions, and executive Orders. Furthermore, the Federal government should grant their state governments more power, due to the connection the state governments hold with their local people.

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

Federalism can be defined as a system in which the power to govern is divided between national and state governments. This belief to share power was constructed by our founding fathers when the Constitution was established. The division of powers was created in order to limit the power of the national government. However, the national government does overpower state laws when the national and state governments don’t agree. As a young democratic nation it was divided between two belief systems, free or enslaved backs.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

The president is the leader of this branch of the government and is sometimes called the chief executive. Here the branch enforced the law which means make sure people obey the laws. The executive branches workers inspect the social policies such as people should pay their taxes, make sure how factories and companies are safe according to the laws that congress

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

Not only is there a federal government, but there are also state and local governments. Furthermore, there are forms of government that function on a higher basis than local governments, but on a lower basis than state governments. Although the federal government has overall control on how the country functions, the other forms of government have a considerable impact on the laws of each area. All states have varying laws that lie along the same lines. For instance, the age to get a Driver’s license is not the same from state to state, but they are around the same age.

Read More
252 Words | 2 Pages

Presidential systems of government have a separation of executive and legislative power, with each party elected separately. This is intended to provide a system of checks and balances to ensure each party is acting in the best interests of the people with the legislative power handling policy making and the president handling policy implementation. Cabinet systems of government rely on a fusion of executive and legislative functions and structures. In this case the people elect the cabinet members who then go on to elect a chief executive. This type of government relies on the cabinet and chief executive to have faith in each other as at any time either party can decide the other is behaving incorrectly and have the people elect a new cabinet.

Read More
940 Words | 4 Pages

To start with, the heads of both Executive branches are also heads of state – the President in the USA and the Monarch in the UK. Both of them appoint new ministers and judges and have the right to veto laws. The main functions of both Executive branches are to execute, to implement and to enforce the law. On top of that, the Executive in both countries is responsible for the daily administration of the state and has its own Cabinet. On the other hand, the main figure of the Executive in the UK, the Prime Minister, also serves in Parliament, while the US head of the Executive, the President, cannot be a part of another government branch.

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

The eternal question in federalism is “who gets more power?” If the central and local governments stopped fighting about this then they would practically merge into one government. Federalism would cease to exist (Moncrieff). The laws at one level would be essentially the same as the laws at every other

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

Dear mayor of whoville, Right now according to Institute for Energy Research about 80% of whovile's fuel consumption comes from (coal, natural gas, oil, etc.). Well, mayor, what happens when we run out of (coal, natural gas, oil, etc.)? I believe the Earth will then depend on nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is when two atoms are (joined together/protected by a fuse) together. The only problem is that it is still a very new type of energy with not much research.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

Unitary, Federal, and Confederate are three different systems of government. With each system of government different advantages and disadvantages arise. A unitary government basically empowers a single, central agency and can often times be labeled as a centralized government. Unitary governments make up most of the world's government. While a unitary government gives power to a sole central government, a Federal government divides the power between a central government and many other local governments.

Read More

More about Different Types Of Government Power In The United States

Related Topics

Open Document