ipl-logo

Comparing The Government Systems Of The United States And The US

940 Words4 Pages

Learning the history and the culture of any country is impossible without knowing how these countries are governed. Since English is a global language, it is essential to have at least some basic knowledge about the government systems in two major English-speaking countries, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. One can get a deeper understanding of the government systems of the UK and the USA with the help of a comparison between their structure and functions.

Firstly, the political regimes in the USA and the UK are partly the same, yet in terms of types of government and constitution these countries are really different. The first main similarity is that the political regimes in both countries are democracies. Also, both countries …show more content…

However, they still have a lot of differences. Both Legislative bodies are bicameral and their main functions are passing legislation, giving authority for the governments to raise and spend money and scrutinising the activities of the governments. Nevertheless, due to the system of check and balances in the USA, the Legislature there can confirm or reject presidential appointments, impeach the president and remove judges from office, and the Legislature in the UK does not have such power. In addition, the Legislature in the UK has a partial "fusion" with the Executive because of a weak separation of powers, while American separation of powers is rather strong and prevent each branch's interference with the work of one another. Both chambers of the Legislature in the USA are elected: the members of the Senate for six years and the representatives from the House of Representatives for two years, whereas the Parliament of the UK is only partly elected, as the House of Lords is a non-elected chamber, and the elections to the House of Commons are held every five years. Also, the US Legislature has the authority to declare war, but the Legislature in the UK does …show more content…

To start with, the heads of both Executive branches are also heads of state – the President in the USA and the Monarch in the UK. Both of them appoint new ministers and judges and have the right to veto laws. The main functions of both Executive branches are to execute, to implement and to enforce the law. On top of that, the Executive in both countries is responsible for the daily administration of the state and has its own Cabinet. On the other hand, the main figure of the Executive in the UK, the Prime Minister, also serves in Parliament, while the US head of the Executive, the President, cannot be a part of another government branch. Plus, the head of the Executive in the USA, the President, is elected for four years along with the Vice President, unlike the head of the Executive in the UK, the Sovereign, who must be from the Royal family and cannot be elected. However, the Prime Minister is elected for five years as well. Furthermore, the Monarch in the UK has never used his or her right to veto laws, while the President has done it a lot of times. It is worth mentioning that the Vice President in the USA can assume the Presidency in case it is necessary, but the Prime Minister in the UK cannot become the Sovereign and assume royal

Show More
Related
451 Words | 2 Pages

There are many different examples of how the structures between both levels of government are similar and how they differ. The US Constitution

Read More
428 Words | 2 Pages

Both Australia and the US have written Constitutions which outline how each government functions and operates, as well as the separation of powers between the Federal and State governments. Both systems have a judiciary that is independent of the other branches of Government. Although the two systems of government share key similarities, there are

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

The president is neither treated like a king nor treated as though he is above the law. He is restricted to absolute decisions he can make on his own because specific checks refer him to either the Senate or House. Hamilton describes how the British King is able to rule because of hereditary qualifications. The President, on the other hand, is elected by a group of people and his time to serve is limited, unlike the King’s. A King gets the final say in determining if a law is passed or not; the executive leader, however, does not.

Read More
460 Words | 2 Pages

A bicameral government means it consists of two parts. The Parliament is the National Legislature of England. After the Glorious Revolution the two sections of the Parliament included the Council of State and the House of Burgesses. The House of Burgesses is the assemblies second house, they were elected by colonists to represent Virginia. The Council of State was the 1rst colonial legislature, members were elected by advisory council participants and VA.

Read More
668 Words | 3 Pages

Yet, they are different, even though the powers are divided in both they are set up differently. For example, in the executive branch of the United States the power is mostly given to the president, currently that person is Barack Obama. In the plural executive there is people added to evade giving too much power to the governor. This certainly shows how the amount of power has been handed out differently. One thing that is different between the governor of Texas and the president is their veto power.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

So as the wise James Madison once said, “...Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.”, we divided up the power fairly to keep a balanced triangle of power. In America, we have three branches of power, the Executive Branch, Legislative Branch, and the Judicial Branch. The Executive Branch is the President and Vice-President, their job is to enforce and carry out the laws made by the Legislative Branch. The Legislative Branch is the Congress, they make laws for the whole country. The Legislative Branch is made up of two sections, the House of Representatives and the Senate, each chosen by each state.

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

However, the House of Lords was unable to propose laws that involved money. In contrast, the House of Commons was the lower house, and at the time less powerful than the House of Lords. The House of Commons’ main function was to propose and approve bills for new laws, and then send them to the House of Lords. Unlike the House of Lords, there were no limitations on what bills they could propose. However, the United States decided to run its government very differently from British

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

This method of separation is known as “checks and balances” referring to the three branches of government the executive, legislative, and judicial branch. The legislative branch is supposed to be the stronger one. It consists of the Congress divided in two chambers: a House of Representatives and a Senate. The members of the House of Representatives are elected by the people and have the responsibility of encouraging popular consent and the Senate is elected by the state legislatures. The executive branch consists of the president, who has the power to receive international ambassadors, negotiate treaties with acceptance of the Senate, and appoint major personnel.

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

Considering the fact that I have lived on eastern long island all my life, it would be thought that I’ve been to all the wildlife refuges possible. Strangely enough, I have never even heard of the “Elizabeth A. Morton National Wildlife Refuge” right off of Noyack Road. This is an upsetting thing after our hike there, it is one of the best refuges I’ve been to in a very long time. The paths are well marked, the bridges and walk ways are well made also the fact that you can literally have wild birds eat out of your hand is amazing. Although this didn’t happen, I’ve been told not just on the hike but by friends that the squirrels and chipmunks will eat out of your hand as well.

Read More
1366 Words | 6 Pages

Governments have been shaping the way people live ever since the first. Each different political system that a government uses are similar and different and have their pros and cons. These similarities allow friendships between countries because of similar political beliefs, but also make enemies between countries because of differences in political beliefs and systems. The government system for the United States (US) being a representative democracy is an example for this because some governments with political systems similar to the US are allies. For example, Canada having socialism as its system which is similar to a representative democracy is an ally with the US.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

The president is the leader of this branch of the government and is sometimes called the chief executive. Here the branch enforced the law which means make sure people obey the laws. The executive branches workers inspect the social policies such as people should pay their taxes, make sure how factories and companies are safe according to the laws that congress

Read More
1342 Words | 6 Pages

Additionally, the Russian government runs on a federation while the United States operates on a Constitution-based federal republic; having a strong democratic tradition. About the Legal System, Russia mainly uses the civil law system which in other words is the judicial review of legislature acts, and the U.S. government uses the Common Law System which is based on the English Common Law from the federal level; using state legal systems based on Common Law except for Louisiana. Lastly, relating to the basis of executive legitimacy, Russia’s presidency is independent of legislature meaning the ministry focused on the parliamentary confidence, while the U.S. presidency is independent of primarily the

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

On a historic August day at the tail end of World War 2 a 20,000-ton force was dropped on two Japanese cities known as the atomic bomb and resulting in 160,000 causalities, substantial destruction, and an agreement to an unconditional surrender that ended the war. If the facts are properly presented it is very clear that there was no alternative to dropping the atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima that could have come close to achieving the success it did for our country and the allied nations. Our leaders are intelligent and they knew the key to strong and successful future for our country was to be proactive and not think of only ending the war but demonstrating to the world that we are the force to be reckoned with and will not back down in the face of our adversaries. Our own valiant president Truman had a multitude of genius reasons for dropping that atomic bomb and I for one am going to support the brave decisions of our leaders and explain

Read More
1131 Words | 5 Pages

The Westminster system of government comprises of a democratically elected lower house. After the executive members the head of government is the prime minister. The next system that falls in place is the opposition which is led by the leader of the party or the parties with the second largest number of seats in the lower house. It follows that in the British system the prime minister and the cabinets are fully in charge of Parliament.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Bagehot once described this feature “as the close union…of the executive and legislative powers.” Unlike the presidential system, which is in operation in the USA, the parliamentary

Read More

More about Comparing The Government Systems Of The United States And The US

Related Topics

Open Document