ipl-logo

Workplace Discrimination Case Study

801 Words4 Pages

Discrimination has become a major issue in the workplace and sometimes difficult to pinpoint discriminative acts. Discrimination acts range from biasness in the promotion, hiring, assignment of duties, compensation, the method of termination, retaliation, various forms of harassment, and so forth. However, Americans can comfortably rely on some federal laws that serve to counter discrimination at the workplace. Throughout the hiring and the termination process, it is important that the employees become aware of the appropriate process to keep off from acts of discrimination. , in this case, John is an employee of the private entity that goes against the principles of the current law relating to discrimination. As such, John has decided to file …show more content…

There are certain steps that John needs to follow to file a discrimination complaint against the organization. Notably, if an employee feels that he or she has been subjected to discrimination, they are entitled to file a complaint or file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (Eeoc.gov, 2010). In accordance with the guidelines, the offended party should submit the claim within at most 180 days from the occurrence of the occurrence event. This would need him to fill out an intake questionnaire and submit it to the EEOC agents or their offices. On the other hand, John has an option of filing the claim online. After the complainant files the complaint with the Commission, the EEOC should make a point of serving the employer within ten days’ notice to make them aware of the existence of the charge. If the case appears strong or rather very complicated, the employer and the complainant will be issued with a mediation offer so that they can try and settle their issues outside the court …show more content…

At this level, the EEOC investigates the company in question, talk to the witnesses, and also examine the record to identify whether there are reasonable grounds for the employee to bring a case against the employer. When the EEOC finds out that there are reasonable grounds to do so, the employee has awarded the right sue the employer on the grounds of discrimination. Notably, the complainant is given 90 days to after getting the go-ahead to sue the employer. However, if there is no reconciliation that is reached, the EEOC has an option of filing the case with a federal district court. It is important to note that most cases filed by the EEOC have a very high success rate and raises more if the cases follow the appeal

Show More
Related
2294 Words | 10 Pages

The claim was made that when he was fired it was due to his race. In the case Hicks files a law suit for wrongful termination under Title VII for racial discrimination. Hicks track record with St. Mary's Honor Center before the events unfolded seen him as a contributing component of the organization. Prior to being fired, Hicks experienced issues with the new change in leadership. While employed with St. Mary's Honor Center the plaintiff

Read More
353 Words | 2 Pages

Why do you believe these actions were discriminatory? The first case file with EECO by Tanya Conde girl friend of Samuel Varriano Maintenance #3 who was fired from Pitt University .The defendent 's in case Robert Godzik, William Franicola supervisor and Pitt University was dismissed . Now Robert Godzik and Pitt University have confidence themselves this isn 't a hostile work environment .With

Read More
578 Words | 3 Pages

In addition, the employees would have to file a ULP with the NLRB within six months of the date which the act of violation took place. Consequently, the NLRB would be permitted to conduct an investigation for evidence or merit. Therefore, if merit is tenable, then the NLRB would make an effort to establish some form of settlement. If a settlement could be reached, it would be seen by an administrative Law Judge to be able to make a settlement. In Addition, a settlement for such kind of a violation could range from reinstatement to back pay.

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

In “William Adrian BUTLER v. CITY OF PRARIE VILLAGE, KANSAS,” the plaintiff argues that he was unjustly fired from his position with the City of Prairie Village, Kansas after he testified in an arbitration hearing involving the city and one of its contractors. He reported rumors of employee thefts to his supervisors. After a couple of years, he reported that he was clinically depressed and asked that if he could work only 40 hours per week. In September of 1987, Butler was hired by the City as an assistant director in its Public Works Department.

Read More
1532 Words | 7 Pages

The plaintiff stated that she was rejected a job opportunity with Corizon after the employer contacted Dr. Ogunsanwo for further review before hire. In order to establish a case for retaliation under Title VII, “the plaintiff must show that: (1) she engaged in a statutorily protected activity: (2) she suffered materially adverse employment action; and (3) there is a causal connection between her participation in the protected activity and the adverse employment action.” There are many proven reasons why retaliation is contradictory to the facts of the case. Succeeding the termination of the plaintiff, the Department privatized majority of its health care through

Read More
547 Words | 3 Pages

When I asked Robert Hoffman to start at 5:00 a.m. to avoid the harassment fromMichael Niehenke and Donna Myers requested denied. C. When Harry Feals and I work together we have Julie Godzik, Robert Godzik, Brain Weaver and Michael Niehenke . These employees have stared at us until Mr. Franicola come after they called him Other employees are aloud to work together 8. Of the Persons in the same, or similar situation as you who was treated worse than you? Harry Feals Maintenance # 1 Harry Feals Maintenance #1 Mr. Feals received 11 weeks of Work for false allegation filed on pitt alert line, now he is seeking professional health with counseling to help cope with working at Pitt at Greensburg. .

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

Should you allow her to retain employment based on the previous EEOC suit? a. Title VII of the Civil Rights act protects against retaliation against an individual who filed a discrimination charge, but it is not absolute. In order for an employee to succeed on a claim of retaliation they must show they engaged in protected activity, adverse employment actions were taken, and there was a causal connection between the employment action taken and the protected activity. If I can show her dismissal had no underlying connection to the protected activity I am not bound by law to retain her employment. b. In Jennings v. Tinley Park Comm.

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

In Jeff Yang’s concept of discrimination shows that it is distinctly ambiguous. Yang’s article “Harvard Lawsuit Is Not What It Seems” it shows the viewpoint of the story from his perspective along with the opposing side. There are both negative and positive sides to this lawsuit. A piece of literature that reflects on this concept is “I Have a Dream” by Martin Luther King Jr.

Read More
309 Words | 2 Pages

The court in Townley, held that after the plaintiff has established a prima facie case for discrimination the corporation has the burden of proof to show that they attempted to accommodate the employee. Townley, 859 F.2d at 614. The Defendant is required to accommodate the employee unless the defendant can prove that accommodating the employee would have caused undue hardship for the employer. Id. Evee will argue that the employer told her to take 3 weeks to consider if she wants to keep her job on a part time basis or be fired which proves that the employer didn’t attempt to accommodate her because they didn’t offer an alternative option so that Evee could maintain her full-time position.

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

Under this law, employees are protected from employer discrimination, employer retaliation, and secure their position with the company. If at any time an employee believes their rights have been violated according to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employees may submit claims with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against their employer detailing all incidents violating employees’ rights. It’s important for employees who feel they have been violated to report incidents immediately, or as soon as possible to the appropriate authority for the most effective

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

Question 1 Title VII is the federal law forbidding employers from discerning against workers from their personal characteristics such as race, sex, and religion or for opposing other actions of the employer or fellow colleagues that violate its provisions . For a retaliation case to be successful, there are three conditions that the retaliation claim must satisfy. First, the employee must have engaged in one of the protected activity, for example, complaining about discriminatory practices.

Read More
1035 Words | 5 Pages

A claim for unemployment benefits should be made at the TEC office within two weeks of the termination and during each subsequent two week period. The TEC will make an initial determination as to whether the person is eligible for benefits. If eligible, the TEC informs the former employer, because the former employer pays the benefits, the employer as the right to some of the information given by the former employee to the TEC and has an opportunity to present information. To be eligible to receive unemployment benefits, the employee must have worked for the employer for a certain length of time and must have made a certain amount of money in wages. The time period is called a base period, and it is based on the calendar quarter system.

Read More
243 Words | 1 Pages

Discrimination is an injustice and can have devastating effects on individuals who are targeted. There are numerous regulations, laws and codes of practice to promote diversity and everyone’s right to fair and equal treatment, ensure equality and end discrimination. One example is The Disability Discrimination Act (DDA). This act makes it unlawful to discriminate against anyone with a disability. Every organisation, by law, is required to have a policy in place relating to disability.

Read More
1175 Words | 5 Pages

If the employee makes a claim citing discrimination, HR would need to counteract it by showing the courts the termination was not a result of any of the classes protected under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. I feel like that if there are any complaints about sexual harassment, unfair treatment due to racism, sexism, or favoritism, the HR department should take the right measures to solve these problems immediately before they have time to manifest into a much bigger issue for the organization. To mitigate the risk of a lawsuit HR needs to investigate these claims in a timely manner and take the appropriate actions against the parties who initiated

Read More
1005 Words | 5 Pages

Your employer will arrange a grievance appeal meeting which you have the right to be accompanied to and your employer will provide the outcome of the grievance appeal meeting in writing. • employment tribunal – if you disagree with the outcome of the grievance appeal meeting then you should seek advice about making an employment tribunal claim (see A Guide to Employment Tribunals section for more information). Be aware that an employment tribunal claim must be made within 3 months less one day of the action you’re complaining

Read More

More about Workplace Discrimination Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document