ipl-logo

Do States Remain The Most Powerful Actor In Global Politics Essay

996 Words4 Pages

To what extent do states remain the most powerful actors in global politics! Discuss States is a powerful actor in global politics as it has a dominant position. A State is a political community as it has an independent organized government with a central authority. A state has recognized borders and have sovereignty and legitimacy. Sovereignty is the independence of a state as it can control over territory and it will also govern. The state consists of a society as it has citizens living there. States uniquely enjoy their sovereignty in international relations as it can legitimately possess coercive military power and create economic wealth form their territory. States can declare wars, as they have the ability to control most of the economic influence within a region. Larger states often dominant the role of international relations within the region. Based on Neorealism, the state plays a very important role in international relations and possesses power to ensure domestic security and economy stability. It also indicates that state is the main actor and clearly specifies the role of the non-states, such as international organization, transnational organizations and many other social organizations. …show more content…

Globalization refers to change in technology which have facilitated the movement of money, information and people beyond the control of nation-states. International intergovernmental organizations are created by states. Organization such as the North Atlantic treaty and the European are well known organizations and they have powerful in internationals relations. The United Nations is solving disputes and arguments between state and they are work together to fight against warfare. The relationships between peace and development are interdependent and it requires the state to play the leading role to coordinate the world circumstance and to protect the world

Show More
Related
2310 Words | 10 Pages

Actors and Processes; Comparison between Canada and Colombia Introduction The idea of globalization presumes integration and similar development for the whole world which in reality is a mirage. This is owing to very many differences among the over two hundred countries across the globe. These countries are sharply contrasting in almost all the spheres of life ranging from, their political systems, size of their economies, the demographics, social practices, cultural practices to governance structures. However, amidst these many differences there are certain common threads that cuts across all the countries in the world for instance however unique and different but each country has a political system that determines how the country is governed.

Read More
1041 Words | 5 Pages

Realists argue that states pursue their interests in a self-interested manner, often employing military force to secure power and influence. From this perspective, moral considerations such as justice and proportionality are secondary to the pursuit of national security and strategic

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

2. States are the most important actors, while the international organization is seen useless, but only as the tool if the state need it. 3. State is a rational actor. State has self-interest.

Read More
1436 Words | 6 Pages

First, they believe that states are the primary actors in the international system. Second, they assume that the organizing principle of the international system is anarchy, which cannot be mediated by international institutions. Without a central authority, power determines the outcomes of state interactions. Third, states can be treated as if their dominant preference were for power. States seek to maximize their

Read More
1384 Words | 6 Pages

In order to understand the relationships and issues being raised at a global and domestic level of analysis needs to be taken into view. The domestic level concerns itself with the clusters of individuals within the states that have an impact on its actions on the global stage. These clusters are in the form of interests groups, political organizations, and government agencies that concern themselves with domestic policies. The third level of analysis is international and explores the relationship between states and organizations which accurately depicts the current dynamic between states and membership in the United Nations. The issue goes deeper in the relationship between the domestic and international levels as seen in Weiss’ example of human rights.

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

Do intelligence services stabilise or destabilise the international system? Intelligence agencies have always been a vital part of the protection of nations. Through Intelligence agencies the benefits tend to outweigh the disadvantages. Intelligence agencies have known to provide analysis in national security, give early warning of impending crisis, protect secrets, and serve domestic and international crisis management by helping to discern the intentions of the current or potential opponent. These are the services which intelligence has provided national and international communities so what happens when a national system affects an international system.

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

The term known as 'state' within societies, has been difficult to define to a particular connotation. Throughout history, from many different civilisations, from the Roman Empire to present day politics, the 'state' has adopted different policies and regimes in order to govern the said country, albeit potentially having ulterior motives. The concept of the 'state' is often defined as the municipal government of a society, which is put into place

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

INTRODUCTION (1) Over the past few decades, one of the most discussed debates has been about the rapid rise of China. However, it is unclear whether the growth of China will lead to revolutionary political upheavals or to a gradual and non-violent redistribution of the world’s power, most significantly, will China’s rise lead to conflict? Since Deng Xiaoping took over the leadership of the country, in 1978, the People 's Republic of China has started on the path of domestic reform, opening to the outside world.

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the rather unusual book, “Theories of International Politics and Zombies”, written by prominent Tufts University Professor Dr. Daniel W. Drezner, the readers of this publication are given insight to the various possibilities of governmental responses (referring to the theories of international relations) to a zombie plague. According to Professor Drezner today, in age, the world faces several “natural sources of fear” (pg. 1) and these issues may range from acts of terrorism, deadly contagions, financial crisis, global cyberwarfare, etc. However, Dr. Drezner stresses the growing importance of the ridiculed issue of a zombie apocalypse, considering it an equally important matter, if not a more significant challenge which humanity will eventually face. He describes what sorts of measures modern governments would take to prevent said calamity.

Read More
1795 Words | 8 Pages

As the famous saying goes, “The strong do what they will while the weak do what they must," so let it be with the counties of the world and the role they play in International Politics. Eurocentrism is a concept that places Europe at the centre of the world. Assuming that it is self containing and self representing, the entire world is looked at with Europe at the centre. Eurocentrism bias leads to an illogical understanding of International Relations and makes politics and judgement to incline in the favour of the powerful. In this essay, I will critique the Eurocentric nature of International Relations theory and world politics.

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

The modern state Christopher Pierson focuses on a normative illustration of the modern state – how it should be. The following discussion tries to summarize the essence of three features. (Monopoly) control of the means of violence Thomas Hobbes came up with his idea of the ‘Common Power’ – the Great Leviathan – owning all the means of violence and ruling over the people. Engels talks about power as ‘arisen out of society but placing itself above it’, meaning that the people give all their power to a higher institution and accepting its rule over them. Weber, in his attempt to define the state, mentions ‘monopoly…of physical force’ claimed by a human community.

Read More
1226 Words | 5 Pages

Brian C. Schmidt’s (2002) chapter, “The History an Historiography of International Relations”, covers detailed aspects of the field of International Relations regarding its history and problems it has faced over its evolution. This essay will argue that Schmidt is able to effectively identify and address difficult issues posed in the International Relations field of work. This essay begins with a brief summary of Schmidt’s work and ideas. Next, the essay will discuss Schmidt’s views on the specific evolutionary issues of lack of coherency and identity behind the history of International Relations. Leading on from here, the essay will display Schmidt’s ideas on presentism and its impact on International Relations.

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

Interpreting that sovereignty was not, after all, a perfect concept and that it was influenced by various aspects. These political scientists went on to criticize the idea of sovereignty as being exercised and influenced by various political, religious, economic and social groups that usually dominate the government of that State. And that sovereignty did not reside with a single body or entity but constantly shifted from one body/group to another and that it did not possess any special characters. Changing Notion of State Sovereignty in the 21st Century All through history the concept of sovereignty had constantly evolved and it was in the 21st century that it started going through various new twists and turns. The idea of state sovereignty slowly started diminishing with the establishment of various international organizations and the Euro Zone, which mainly focus on international harmony and in upholding the international integrity rather than state sovereignty.

Read More
919 Words | 4 Pages

Other influences were government officials and the electoral considerations of the party or parties in office. The goverrments of states were powerful for two reasons. The first one is because they possessed legal sovereignty. The second reason is because they had a political legitimacy as the only democratically elected actors in the integration process. The power in these international organizations is posessed by the states and decisions are made by a unanimous voting.

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

Globalization can also be define as the process of international integration arising from the interchange of basic social arrangements such as world views, products, ideas, politics, right, values, norms, ideology, identity, citizenship, culture (AlRodhan & Stoudann, 2006; Beerkeens 2003). Scholte (1999) refers to Globalization as a “processes whereby many social relations acquire relatively distanceless and borderless qualities, so that human lives are increasingly played out in the world as a single place.” In the book “the great globalization debate”, David Held and Anthony McGraw (2002) states that: Globalization denotes the expanding scale, growing magnitude, speedingup and deepening impact of interregional flows and patterns of social interaction. It refers to a shift or transformation in the scale of human social organization that links distant communities and expands the reach of power relations across the world's major regions and continents (Held & Anthony,2002

Read More

More about Do States Remain The Most Powerful Actor In Global Politics Essay

Related Topics

Open Document