ipl-logo

Comparing The Doctors Strike Of 1962 Forged The Path To Public Healthcare In Canada

1015 Words5 Pages

How the Doctors’ Strike of 1962 Forged the Path to Public Healthcare in Canada
Abstract
During the post-war era, there was a noticeable movement towards state intervention in the establishment of universal public healthcare systems. Organized medicine strongly opposed this development out of fear that changes to the system would diminish professional autonomy and reduce physician income. This paper examines the Saskatchewan strike of 1962 that involved 700 doctors who withheld medical services to the residents of Saskatchewan following the announcement that the province would be adopting a federally funded health insurance program. This paper dissects the philosophical underpinnings of the political action of striking taken by the doctors …show more content…

The Saskatchewan physicians that partook in the strike alleged that the involvement of the federal government in health service administration would ultimately relinquish them of their freedom and the Medical Care Insurance Act would result in the destruction of the democratic way (“Civilization.ca - Making Medicare: The History of Health Care in Canada, 1914-2007,” 2015). The philosophy behind the doctors’ intense desire to determine the nature of their relationship with patients and retain their right to set their own fees is classic liberalism. The classic liberalist possesses a spectrum of views, from near-anarchist to those that attribute a significant role to the state in economic and social policy (Gaus, 2004). Many can argue that withholding vital life-saving services to the population was anarchistic owing the fact that the medical profession tried to overthrow the government (Badgley & Wolfe, 1965). Marchildon and Schrijvers utilized the term ‘medical liberalism’ to describe the individualistic philosophy behind the doctors’ strike. Medical liberalism is characterized by professional autonomy, doctor-patient confidentiality, free choice of doctor by the patient, and fees set by individual doctors as opposed to the state (2011). Each of these principles was fought for during the strike staged by the Saskatchewan …show more content…

The doctors of Saskatchewan wanted the freedom to practice medicine under his or her own terms. Though the government was perceived to have won the strike in 1962, the doctors were able force major compromises from the government. The dispute was resolved by British physician Stephen Taylor, who played a pivotal role in introducing Britain’s national health plan (Baltzan, 2002). Through his mediation efforts, Lord Stephen Taylor was able to negotiate terms and preserve a fee-for-service model for primary and specialized care as opposed to a salaried-employment model. This meant the doctors were able to bill their patients if they chose to do so and they could also charge more than what would be reimbursed to the patients under the provincial plan (“Health Policy - The Canadian Encyclopedia,” 2006). The negotiated terms also granted the doctors the option of working outside the public medical insurance scheme (Marchildon & Schrijvers, 2011). These negotiations were outlined in the Saskatoon agreement Lord Taylor drafted, which once signed; enabled Canada to begin its journey to adopt this modified design of the universal public healthcare

Show More
Related
826 Words | 4 Pages

Thomas Clement “Tommy” Douglas (20 October 1904 – 24 February 1986) known as “The Father of Medicare”, had done extraordinary work to make Canada a unique country. The problems he faced with short term helped to greatly benefit Canadians in the long term. The experience Douglas had from when he was a child to when he finishes his studies, influenced him to join politics and help millions of Canadians. In 1944, Tommy Douglas became the premier of Saskatchewan and helped raise Canada’s reputation in front of the whole world by introducing new laws and regulations. Tommy Douglas’s own childhood experience led him to join politics and help millions of Canadians by introducing Medicare system in Canada.

Read More
1608 Words | 7 Pages

When Douglas was a young Minister, during the Depression, he saw a lot of death from diseases and sicknesses, that could easily have been prevented if the people affected had enough money to afford healthcare. He himself had to bury two people that were close to him and the church he was employed to. He saw what the clutches of poverty did to people who were gravely sick. Even before his universal healthcare topic, he and his government had already begun providing “full funding of mental illnesses, STD’s and cancer(dufourlaw.com). Years after on November 19, 1961, Saskatchewan Medical Insurance Act, was made a part of the legislation a couple weeks after Tommy Douglas had left the leadership of the party.

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

Many families would lose their loved ones because they don’t have the money to get medical treatment. Therefore, he started to put every effort towards introducing the first ever universally accessible medical plan in North America. He not only had the thought of having a centralized health care system but he did his best to bring people a more efficient health plan than what was offered by private health-care insurers, so that common citizens could really benefit from it. When he became the Health Minister in 1944, during the first term of his government he took the first steps towards the Medicare program he dreamed for. Major advances were made in the first 2 years despite much opposition from province physicians and private health-care insurance companies.

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

In 1961, he created Saskatchewan Medical Care Insurance Act. It was a payment to private insurance. The cost was $12 per person every year and $24 per family every year. He promised that all of Saskatchewan would collectively pay for those who were

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

This particularly was just a start of the Medicare program Douglas for the most part wanted to basically introduce in a very big way. He then in 1947 created Canada’s first universal and compulsory sort of hospital insurance program, or so they particularly thought. This legislation kind of had offered “expanded actually hospital facilities, x-rays and lab services, common drugs, and particularly other generally hospital services” (“Achievements”), which actually is fairly significant. Finally, in 1959, Douglas literally was finally able to make his Medicare plan generally public in a for all intents and purposes big way. Furthermore, his plan covered every person in Saskatchewan with “pre-paid, publicly administered health care” (“Tommy Douglas”) in a fairly major way.

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

Now, Douglas is proclaimed to be very relevant in Canadian history for the reason of the accomplishments that he acquired from the time he was still a politician. He received many loving followers and supporters because of how improved, the government was when he was still a premier. The improved government provided public pensions, expansion of Canada’s social safety net, social programs, especially the introduction of the Medicare. Douglas’s Universal Health Care Program is one of the reasons for his popularity and relevance to the people and Canada, it removes any sort of biasedly and discrimination that could occur in any patients that could be applying for it and for its policy of no charge to any citizens who is using it. Though in America, healthcare isn't free and solely can be obtained by paying for it by each individual, which raises their ideal of individuality, this makes their health care sort-of useless, in contrary to what it is meant.

Read More
109 Words | 1 Pages

Social contracts in America have been molded around public policy through the years. Public policy is influenced by the citizens of America and the countries stability. Social contracts like the Affordable Care Act (ACA) conveys a political message that the government is establishing a social contract with the citizens of America. The ACA established a social contract with physicians and hospitals by mandating rules and regulations. However, both social contracts have flaws that can hinder physician and patient relationship, care, and cost.

Read More
1358 Words | 6 Pages

In the film Escape Fire the Fight to Rescue American Healthcare, there were many insightful examples of why our Unites States healthcare revolves around paying more and getting less. The system is designed to treat diseases rather than preventing them and promoting wellness. In our healthcare industry, there are many different contributors that provide and make up our system. These intermediaries include suppliers, manufacturers, consumers, patients, providers, policy and regulations. All these members have a key role in the functionality of the health care industry; however, each role has its positives and negatives.

Read More
1520 Words | 7 Pages

People today feel free to stand up for their rights as workers to the federal government because of the influence that the Winnipeg General Strike had on Canada. “Although many of the workers lost their jobs and suffered great personal losses after the general strike was quashed, they are credited with linking labour and political action and helping to enact laws years later that would protect workers''⁹ (Lu). Without the Winnnipeg General Strike, mistreated workers and employees would have a difficult time speaking up about their concerns, especially to the government. However, the strikers showed that people will listen if you fight for the cause. Overall, the federal government was impacted by the Winnipeg General Strike through the acts that were placed to protect Canadian workers and the confidence in speech that employees have because of the strikers

Read More
832 Words | 4 Pages

The one major difference between the Canadian health care system and the American health care system is that is that they have a privatized health care system. A documentary such as “Sicko directed by Michael Moore” demonstrates the crisis of American citizens without health care coverage. Canada’s universal health care system ensures those who cannot pay for health to not suffer, contrary to the Sicko

Read More
367 Words | 2 Pages

For both the uninsured group and those who are eligible for government assistance because of their low economic position, access to health is limited by the number of private providers willing to treat them. In many cases private providers are linked to particular private health insurance companies and won 't accept patients outside their network. These people must then rely on the overburdened public health system for care, and as such usually only seek treatment in emergencies. The public health system, while filled with competent staff, is nevertheless restricted by its funding and can therefore not always provide all these patients with the best quality of care. The inequality in health care access is a continuing issue in America and as such it is important for future consumers and workers on the Foothill College campus to have a thorough understanding of the issue so they can move to improve the problem in the

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

Canada enjoys the benefits of a “universal” insurance plan funded by the federal government. The idea of having a publicly administered, accessible hospital and medical services with comprehensive coverage, universality and portability has its own complex history, more so, than the many challenges in trying to accommodate the responsibility of a shared-cost agreement between federal and provincial governments. (Tiedemann, 2008) Canada’s health care system has gone through many reforms, always with the intent to deliver the most adequate health care to Canadians. The British North American Act, Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Services Act, Saskatchewan’s Medical Care Act, and the Canada Health Act are four Acts that have played an important

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Analysis of Healthcare to Thesis Healthcare is important to our well being, which is why we have free health care. That also means that Canadians have the burden of paying higher taxes in order to have free health care. Argument #4: The Aging

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

Health Care is a huge and important part of Canada and what it is. Canadian citizens all have access to Canada 's healthcare system known as `Medicare`. Medicare is managed by the federal government delivered through a publicly funded health care system, in cooperation with the 10 provinces and 3 territories. Under the health care system, individual citizens are provided preventative care and medical treatments from primary care physicians as well as access to hospitals, dental surgery, and additional medical services. With a few exceptions, all citizens qualify for health coverage regardless of medical history, personal income, or standard of living.

Read More

More about Comparing The Doctors Strike Of 1962 Forged The Path To Public Healthcare In Canada

Related Topics

Open Document