Andrew Mallard is a British-born Australian living in Western Australia. Andrew was new to the town when he was suspected of murdering Pamela Lawrence on May 23rd, 1994. Andrew Mallard was convicted on two pieces of evidence. The first piece of evidence was police notes, which claimed that Mallard had confessed. Though Mallard did not sign these notes.
Even when Michael’s new defense team, through the innocence project, found a crime that was eerily similar to the method of murder and subsequent events to the one that Michael was convicted of, the new prosecutor in Williamson County fought hard to keep DNA testing from taking place, even stating that they objected to the testing now because the defense hadn’t requested it before (Morton, 2014). There was further evidence of ineffectiveness in that the coroner who’d changed his estimated time of death between the autopsy and trial, had come under scrutiny for his findings in this case, as well as several others, with claims of gross errors “including one case where he came to the conclusion that a man who’d been stabbed in the back had committed suicide” (Morton, 2014). This was only one of the many injustices that were committed against Michael Morton throughout his trial. In August of 2006, the defense was finally granted permission to perform DNA testing on the items that had been taken from his wife’s body (Morton, 2014). Although this testing did not reveal any information about the guilty party, it did at least give Michael the knowledge that Chris was not sexually violated before or after her death (Morton,
Robert Pickton seemed to murdered only the Eastside women which is the poorest neighborhood in BC (Newton, 2014). There was no pattern of Pickton choosing the victims, they seem to be missing randomly and suddenly. One of the victim name Stephanie Lane’s family shared there feeling towards Pickton’s murder case (CBC News, 2015). Stephanie’s DNA was founded on Pickton’s farm in 2003. However, Stephanie’s evidence could not proceed in the trial due to small amount of blood found.
How Jeff Smith landed in jail is an enthralling parable of a spirited and ambitious young man looking to bring positive change to the nation. Jeff Smith was born in St. Louis, Missouri in 1973 to a middle class family. Smith attended Ladue high school and then went on to graduate from UNC and Washington University with degrees in political science. In 2004 a Democratic Primary was being held for a Missouri U.S. congressional seat, and Smith decided to run. Smith at the time was a virtually unknown figure in the political world, but with the help from a young, bright, and driven campaign staff, he decided to run against a the scion Russ Carnahan.
Adolfo Davis committed murder at 14 years old and was sentenced to a life in prison. The judge argued that Adolfo had known what he was doing during the robbery. She has a point that Adolfo could have changed his mind at the time of the robbery. Also Adolfo had numerous opportunities to get help and leave the gang. He could have called the police and report his situation.
On Sunday, November 13, 1842 a double murder occurred at Smith Farm in Old Fields, Long Island. The victims, Alexander Smith and and Rebecca Smith, were a wealthy, well- respected married couple who ran Smith farm. George Weeks, the Smiths farmhand, was reporting for work the monday after the murder and heard the dog barking from the work-shed by the Smiths house. George Weeks then became suspicious since the dog was usually inside with Mr. Smith. George then looked in the house and saw that the east room window was broken and Mr. and Mrs. Smith were lying on the floor covered in blood.
John Smith was arrested for burglary and possession of a narcotic drug. There are several things that will occur in the first hour or so of John Smiths arrest. However, the process from arrest to arraignment and furthermore from John Smiths trail to incarceration then eventually his release to parole or probation is complex and interlocking. First, his person will be secured and transported to the police station to be processed.
Truman Capote’s novel, In Cold Blood, follows the chilling, morbid, and completely accurate quadruple homicide of the Clutter family in Holcomb, Kansas and explains, in great detail, the personalities, thoughts, and origins of the killers, Perry Smith and Dick Hickock. Capote is able to capture the vulnerability of Perry and Dick and challenges the reader to think about what a criminal actually entails and represents. The common mold of a criminal consists of anti-social values, criminal peers, antisocial personality, dysfunctional family, low self-control, and substance abuse (Hegger). Perry Smith fits into all of these aspects one way or another, making him an ideal representation of how most criminals act and think. In the novel, In Cold
A Mysterious Murder On a quiet June night tragedy struck the small town of Villisca, Iowa (“8 People Murdered in Their Beds in Villisca”). A tragedy that later became known as the most notorious murder in Iowa history. The random crime left the whole community shocked. With many strange twists and turns in the case it remains unsolved. It has forever changed the nice town of Villisca.
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you are here because one person in this courtroom decided to take law into her own hands. The defendant, Mrs. Dominique Stephens, murdered the man that she vowed to love. This sole act by the defendant is violation of all morals and her husband’s right to live. Afterwards, she even felt guilty about this violation of justice and called the cops on herself, and she later signed a written statement stating that she is guilty of the murder of Mr. Donovan Stephens. Then the defendant later recanted this statement and said that she only killed Mr. Stephens in self defense.
“You are the district attorney. Write the speech you will deliver asking for the death penalty. Cite specifically despicable aspects of the crime that warrant the punishment you chose”. Essay “In Cold Blood” Perry Smith, and Dick(Richard)
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we are here today to discuss the murder of John Wright. On November 15, Mr. Wright was found in his bed with a rope around his neck, presumably strangled to death. His body was discovered by his wife supposedly and did not bother to notify to the local authorities. At eight o'clock in the morning, Mr. Hale went to look for Mr. Wright and found Minnie, Mr. Wright’s wife, sitting in a rocking chair inside of the house. Mr. Hale asked Minnie for her husband and she stated that John Wright was dead in the bedroom.
The definition of murder is; the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another, so if the deceased wasn’t directly impacted by another human being would the death still be murder? The brother of William Armstrong can not be held accountable for his brothers death. Mr. Armstrong’s brother was a great encouragement to William. He always pushed him to go past his comfort zone. When William said “No, I can’t walk”, his brother told him “... yes you can Doodle, all you gotta do is try.”
Jeffrey Dahmer ~was born in 1960, Jeffrey’s father was not around much because of his job. When Jeffrey was at the age of four he was diagnosed with a double hernia. The operation scared him letting doctors explore his body. His experience is said to have marked his subconscious forever. He became very insular and lacking in self-confidence.
A murder has happened, and the murder has framed in innocent. Indian Joe has murdered Doctor Robinson, and framed Mutt Potter, but the whole ordeal was witnessed by Huck and Tom, both being kids. But lately he has had nightmares about the murder, and is faced with the decision to tell or not to tell that is the question, and in my opinion he should. Because there is a murderous man still out there, Muff Potter was framed, and the terror that Huck and Tom went through and are still living through. First reason why he should end everything of this situation.
