ipl-logo

The Dred Scott Case

1016 Words5 Pages

Are African-Americans still slaves for the white people? Well, I believe they used to be slaves for the white people and were treated differently. Thankfully, there was a man who stood up and made the first step in solving the conflict in discrimination. His name was Dred Scott. Dred Scott was an American hero who was known as a savior to the African-American people. He gave the United States of America to also look at the significance of his kind of people. Even though the decision in Dred Scott’s case created conflicts leading to the Civil War and innocent deaths, Dred Scott impacted the USA in a good way because he never gave up his fight for freedom and impacted the civil rights movement. Dred Scott was a good leader in having the courage …show more content…

Unfortunately, the decision was Dred Scott failing to win the case. He had failed to provide a witness to testify that Dred Scott was a slave along with a women named Harriet. They gave birth to Eliza and Lizzie. The judges granted Dred Scott a new trial. In the new trial, he had provided evidence of him being owned by someone. However, the judges still decided a No for the case “Dred Scott v. Emerson.” Technically, he was still legally a slave and should have been free while living in a free state. (Hughes)
Later on, Dred Scott was sent to a new owner named Sanford. Dred Scott had to find another chance in the court and sued his owner. This time Dred Scott was able to take this case to the federal court. Dred Scott gave significant proof in the constitution. In the constitution, it is evidentially proven in the 14th Amendment of the USA constitution. (The Constitution of the United …show more content…

Obviously racial discrimination was a big problem as time passed.(Background on Racial Discrimination) However without Dred Scott, this problem wouldn’t have been solved. This can be explained due to the fact that Dred Scott really showed how much white people discriminated dark-skinned people. He was the first one to show, tell, and prove that every black person in the United States of America should have their rights and should be deserved to be the person they are. He truly showed how crazy it was to discriminate people just because of skin color and won the case to prove that African-Americans should deserve their freedom.
(The Dred Scott Decision Explained: US History Review)
In conclusion, Dred Scott had an enormous impact to the United States of America. The current USA wouldn’t be the country it is today if discrimination was not noticed. Dred Scott surely showed that white people were treating the black people differently. This made the people start to argue about their skin color rights and caused everyone to be equal

Show More
Related

Dred Scott Case Summary

550 Words | 3 Pages

Summary of Source The editorial discloses the power that the Court adheres to and whether it should be accountable for the decision making of fugitive slaves. The writer had discussed that in no way did the verdict of the Dred Scott case follow an act of law, but was merely “nullity.” During the settlement, they decided that since Dred Scott’s master had brought him on free land in Missouri or of the United States without having a citizenship, which resulted in him having no case. It continues on to say that the jurisdiction of the case was influenced by opinion, which did not involve any legalities.

Read More

Dred Scott Vs Sandford Case Study

509 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott was taken back into slavery and accused Sandford because Scott was in a free states and claimed that he was in the free state long enough to be a free slave. The Supreme court ruled against Dred Scott, this decision affected blacks preventing them to become citizens and an giving them the right to appeal to a jury and making it harder for a slave to escape because the free states didn’t make a runaway slave a free slave. The case also affected popular sovereignty. Where states got to choose if they were to be a free states or a slave

Read More

Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case Study

455 Words | 2 Pages

The two parties in this case are Dred Scott and John Sanford. Scott, a former slave bought by Dr. John Emerson, argued that when him and the Emerson family moved to Illinois, which was a free state, that he became a free man and no longer could be held as a slave to the Emerson family when they moved to the slave state of Missouri. Sanford, Mrs. Emerson’s brother, argued that since he went to Missouri with Mrs. Emerson, and that it was legal in Missouri to hold slaves, that he was still considered to be Mrs. Emerson’s property. Once Dr. Emerson died, Scott and his family sued Mrs. Emerson for false imprisonment, but Mrs. Emerson won the case in a Missouri Circuit court when Scott’s lawyers were unable to prove that Emerson was holding him as a slave. Scott’s lawyers argued for a retrial and it went to the Missouri Supreme Court.

Read More

History Of The Antislavery Case: Somerset V. Stewart

344 Words | 2 Pages

To first understand why Mr. Dred Scott decided to sue for his freedom, we have to understand the prelude to his story. Even before Dred Scott was born a case in London was buzzing that would emancipate slaves and some historians believe the case contributed to increasing colonial support for separatism in the Thirteen Colonies of British North America, by parties on both sides of the slavery question who wanted to establish independent government and law (Britannica). The case was Somerset v. Stewart and it has been deemed one of the most important legal actions in the history of the antislavery movement (Weiner 71). The facts of the case were that James Somerset was a slave of Charles Stewart, an officer in the British colony of Boston in

Read More

Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis

774 Words | 4 Pages

In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1957, a black man named Dred Scott who at the time was living in Illinois and previously in free territory of Wisconsin before moving back to the slave state of Missouri, had gone against the government and appealed to the Supreme Court hoping he would get the grant of freedom. Scott attempted to sue the the Missouri courts for his freedom, but ultimately failed in the end. He was claiming that his residence in a freed territory made him a free man, but the courts resided. Eventually, Scott brought this case to the Supreme Court which caused a big dispute between the people in America about the

Read More

Dred Scott And Ryland Case

451 Words | 2 Pages

Dred Scott was ruled a slave. The next day Mrs. Emerson’s attorneys went to St. Louis Circuit Court to file bonds signed by

Read More

Dred Scott Vs Sandford Essay

601 Words | 3 Pages

In 1857, an African American man named Dred Scott sued for his freedom in the Supreme Court. His owners brought him along on their trips across free states. Dred Scott failed in suing before his case was presented in the Supreme Court. Roger B. Taney was the fifth chief Justice of the United States when he wrote the Dred Scott vs Sandford decision. The Dred Scott vs Sandford case ended with the decision that African Americans, free and enslaved, had no rights and could not become citizens because they were property.

Read More

How Did Dred Scott Contribute To Freedom

561 Words | 3 Pages

This act had limited the spread of slavery into the new territories. Dred was influenced to become who he is from all the hardships he’s faced as a slave and as a social activist suing for his freedom. Dred Scott became more noticed and popular when he fought in court against Sandford to gain his freedom (Dred Scott v Sandford). Dred had to overcome many things in his life to become who he was. For example, Dred scott’s guardian ms.ermon sold him to her brother; he had been a slave for a long time until he battled in court for his

Read More

The Dred Scott Decision And Bleeding Kansas

756 Words | 4 Pages

Dred Scott was born was a slave in the state of Virginia and was owned by Peter Blow, who died in 1832. Scott only had two masters after Blow’s death; one lived in Wisconsin and later Illinois, both of which prohibited slavery, yet, Scott didn’t petition for freedom. Instead he met his wife Harriet. The two met their new master in Louisiana, who did not grant them freedom, so Scott looked for legal action to escape his slavery. Over a period of seven years, he went through trial and retrial until he was denied his final freedom in 1854.

Read More

Antebellum Era Dbq

1225 Words | 5 Pages

Moreover, he was involved in the Dred Scott court case. During the Dred Scott Decision, the Supreme Court denied African Americans citizenship in America regardless of whether they were free or

Read More

Dred Scott: A Struggle For Freedom

825 Words | 4 Pages

Irene Emerson that Dred Scott and his family were free. On March 22, 1852 the Missouri Supreme Court reversed it. Dred Scott and his attorneys went to the Federal Court, the United States Supreme Court. On March 6, 1857 the court said that the Scott family would stay slaves. Chief Justice Roger Taney said that because the Scott’s were African Americans they were not citizens of the United States and could not sue for their freedom.

Read More

The Dred Scott Decision

335 Words | 2 Pages

he Dred Scott decision of 1857 was a significant decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court that declared that blacks, regardless of whether they were free or a slave, had no legal standing because they were not American citizens. The decision was not the first to be made regarding Dred Scott; a Missouri jury ruled in Scott 's favour when Scott claimed that his residence in Illinois and Wisconsin made him free, but the state supreme court ruled against him, which lead to the case being escalated to the US Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court ruled against Scott 7-2. The Dred Scott decision is considered a landmark decision and is indicative of the tumultuous political climate of the time.

Read More

Martin Luther King Thesis Statement

916 Words | 4 Pages

The Man with a Dream Martin Luther King Jr. famously said, “I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” He was one of America’s most influential civil rights leaders to ever exist. He was very passionate about his progression of nonviolent protesting and raised plenty awareness towards the media of racial inequalities eventually working towards a significant change that would change the world forever. Martin Luther King Jr. positively affected the world by becoming the leader of the civil rights movement and bringing racial acceptance to the U.S. through nonviolent protest. King was very inspired by India’s revolutionary civil rights leader, Gandhi.

Read More

Supreme Court Case Essay

537 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott was sued for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived for a time in a "free" territory. The Court ruled against him, saying that under the Constitution, he was his master 's property. The people involved with this court case are the Supreme Court,Dred Scott, and Chief Justice Roger B. The final judgment for this case ended up in Dred Scott 's favor.

Read More

Cause Of The Civil War Essay

685 Words | 3 Pages

Dred Scott was a slave who attempted to gain his freedom. Scott was owned by a man for the early part of his life, and then was sold to a new man once his original owner died (Tindall 672). He followed his new owner around the country, and lived in several free states (Tindall 672). Once his second owner died, Scott filed for his freedom (Tindall 672). After going through a rigorous process, the court finally decided that Scott had no grounds for his case because he was not actually a citizen (Tindall 672).

Read More

More about The Dred Scott Case

Related Topics

Open Document