Drug Makers Pay For Lunch As They Pitch Essay

530 Words3 Pages

Pharmaceuticals companies has been having an unusual relationship with doctors by giving free lunches to them so doctors can prescribe medications for their patients. There’s been a large amount of people who say that even those small lunches should be banned. Consequently, in Stephaine Saul’s article, “Drug makers Pay for Lunch as They Pitch”, it is unethical for the doctors to obtain free lunch from the Pharmaceuticals companies in exchange to get these prescriptions for their patients. No matter how big or small the lunches the doctors gets from these drug companies, the prescriptions that the doctors prescribed for their patients can opposed a problem. The doctors are getting free lunches, however, patients’ life always comes first in play. If the medications get to the doctor and delivers it to the patients, how will the patients know if that prescription is good enough for them to take? Just because getting free lunches in exchange for the …show more content…

According to the “Grow Youthful” website, the industry of the Pharmaceutical companies is based on patients and legal approvals. Yet, the more money that these companies make, the more it can bribe, threaten, and lie to whoever it is subscribing to. Moreover, Pharmaceutical companies probably gets people to write to ensure that the results of these prescriptions that they’re making, are a success even though they’re not. On the “Grow Youthful” website, it says, “Pharmaceutical companies routinely hire ghost writers or professional media consultants to ensure that the results of studies read the way that they want them to read - and they conceal potentially serious or even fatal side-effects” Even though these writers and writing about the prescription, once it gets to the patients, it can be a lie and can lead to fatal deaths or