Both of hospitals in the U.S. and China have adopted Electronic Health Records (EHRs). The transition from paper-based record to electronic record is a milestone in healthcare. Also, they both lay emphasis on information sharing and interoperability. For example, in the U.S., patients’ information can be shared between DoD and VA facilities. In the case of PKUPH, the hospital upgraded the inpatient systems to improve efficiency and effectiveness in information communication and data sharing between the headquarters and the branch. Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) is another significant move in the U.S. healthcare reform. CPOE assists healthcare professionals in entering an order using the electronic system. A CPOE system also cuts …show more content…
PKUPH started investing in BI in 2009 and now have witnessed a few benefits in healthcare management, including the control of resource usage, connection with insurance, departmental performance evaluation, and data analysis. American hospitals are also aware of the potential benefits of BI tools, such as prediction of needs, data analysis on disease treatment, and improvement of response rates [1]. Even though both of the two countries have EHRs, the adoption rate in the U.S. (more than 90%) [2] is much higher than that of in China (50%) [3]. Class III hospitals in China have higher chances to upgrade IT systems. It is not uncommon that physicians in township and Class I/ II hospitals in rural area still work with pen and paper nowadays. Hospitals in China have concentrated more on the technical modules, and each module has its specific target users. Laboratory information system (LIS) is designed mainly for lab usage, and picture archiving, and communication system (PACS) is for the radiologists. However, the hospitals in the U.S. are ahead in this area. Instead of focusing on the technology modules themselves, U.S. healthcare spent more effort on the system integration to facilitate healthcare professionals in patient data management and decision-making