ipl-logo

Early Life And Psychological Issues In Jared Loughner's Case

1313 Words6 Pages

January 8, 2011, who knew that Jared Lee Loughner would fire a gun killing 6 victims and injuring 13 including Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson, Arizona. Many people may know him as the mugshot grin guy, but others see him as mentally unstable. There are many questions that come to mind when thinking of this tragedy such as how the role of politics play apart in this incident, what was his mental condition at the time of the crime, and how would treating his mental illness play in his defense. By exploring Jared Loughner’s early life and psychological issues, one can gain a better understanding on the case and the guilty verdict.
The signs of some psychological issues may have developed early in Jared as observed by many of his …show more content…

Similarly like Hinckley, Loughner was found incompetent and unable to stand trial in May 2011 and in four month he will be reevaluated. Both the defense and prosecution's psychologist and psychiatrist diagnosed Jared Loughner with schizophrenia. According to the Dusky v. United States case, this trial gave rights to have a competency evaluation before proceeding with a trial. Since Jared was found incompetent and his charges for killing and the attempt to assassinate a congresswoman were serious, the next steps would be to give him treatment and have him place at a psychiatric center to become competent, and that is exactly what the judge ordered. Loughner's defense team however, did not want him to receive treatment because he had the right not to receive treatment in which the defense team feared they were going to give Jared the death penalty (Lacey, 2013). Consequently, the longer Jared remain incompetent to understand what is happening in the court, the longer the defense team has to come up with reasons to protect their client from not receiving the death penalty. In the Sell v. Unites States trial, the Supreme Court said that it was okay to involuntary medicate someone for the purpose of gaining competence. There has been many research to find that those who are found incompetent tend to have long …show more content…

(2014), Arizona do not have the a not guilty by reason of insanity plea, but instead utilizes a guilty except insane plea. After the Hinckley case, Arizona laws have buckled down about using the insanity plea. Therefore, Jared's defense attorney tried looking at different options including “proving by clear and convincing evidence, which is an extremely high burden ... that the defendant did not understand the wrongfulness of his conduct"(Johnson, 2011, para. 5). There is no concluding evidence as to why the defense team did not use the “guilty except insane” please in this case, but there are speculations about how the odds would not be in Jared Loughner’s favor especially considering the almost similar incident of John Hinckley. Less than one percent of people actually use the not guilty by reason of insanity plea, so in this case there weren’t any benefits of using the guilty by insane

Show More
Related
853 Words | 4 Pages

Kinkel had a long history of paranoid schizophrenia and depression. He also had a very long blood line history of mental illness. Medical experts evaluated Kinkel to the possibility of him being able to be rehabilitated and possibilities of returning to a regular life. The experts were very skeptical and doubtful. His sentence was challenged as inhumane, but Oregon State Constitution was very clear about his

Read More
1385 Words | 6 Pages

While Simmons was starting to serve his time, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that it was unconstitutional to give the death penalty to the mentally challenged in 2003. Due to this new law Simmons case was reviewed once again. They had come to the conclusion that due to a national consensus, many are against the death penalty of juvenile offenders. They then sentenced Simmons to life in prison without the chance of parole. The State of Missouri appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

Under Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-502, does Aaron Wilson, 1) suffer from a mental disease or defect at the time of the incident, and 2) know right from wrong at the time of the incident; and will therefore be found guilty except insane? A.R.S § 13-502 states “a person may be found guilty except insane if at the time of the commission of the criminal act, the person was afflicted with a mental disorder or defect of such severity that the person did not know the criminal act was wrong.” Ariz. Rev. Stat.

Read More
1053 Words | 5 Pages

Checking to see if someone is competent to stand trial is another investigative technique used by law enforcement. Every citizen has equal protections under the law, so making sure David Berkowitz was able to comprehend the trial was vital. A psychiatrist test was ordered to see if Berkowitz was competent. It determined that Berkowitz was not able to assist in his own defense and did not completely understand the charges against him. They believed he had the capacity to understand these killings were wrong, and know of the charges against him but he suffered from paranoid psychosis that left him emotionally dead, therefore he couldn’t aid in his own defense.

Read More
1598 Words | 7 Pages

TERM PAPER JARED LEE LOUGHNER: COMPETENT OR INCOMPETENT? SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR T. TULLY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CRJ 202, SECTION 007 CORRECTIONS FALL 2014 BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE CUNY BY TIFFANY SANO NEW YORK, NEW YORK OCTOBER 20, 2014 On January 8th, 2o11, the city of Tucson, Arizona, suffered a traumatic experience.

Read More
1276 Words | 6 Pages

He underwent a complete personality change after his girlfriend left him, however, this was just the cherry on top of everything else he had been going through. His neighbor expressed that the family was always private which was indicative of abuse and could have been a factor long before his girlfriend left him. His friend Zachary confirmed this as he described Loughner’s home as a “hostile” environment. Loughner’s parents were alcoholics which he claimed would abuse him during his childhood. Personally, as a daughter of an alcoholic this story hits home as that could have easily been my life had I not had others around supporting me.

Read More
464 Words | 2 Pages

Insanity is an illness an individual cannot overcome and will make decisions without thinking. Lacking the further knowledge of a criminal's mental state does not endorse the fate of acquiring the death

Read More
938 Words | 4 Pages

Significance for forensic practice a. While Dusky had already established that a defendant has a fundamental right to not be put on trial unless he can satisfy the two-factor requirements to demonstrate competency, this case clarified that states must use a preponderance of the evidence to evaluate competency during a criminal trial and cannot place a clear and convincing burden of proof on the defendant to show that he is incapable to stand trial. b. Summarily, a State may not proceed with a criminal trial after the defendant has demonstrated that he is more likely than not to be incompetent, and cannot demand high level level burden of proof. VII. Discussion a. I agree with this decision. When a state has the liberty to heighten the burden of proof placed on the defendant to prove incompetency, I agree that there is a serious and significant threat that some defendants who are indeed incompetent may be unjustly deemed competent.

Read More
1578 Words | 7 Pages

On April 20, 1999, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold carried out an attack on Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado. They fired guns towards students, killing thirteen people and injuring more than twenty. Afterwards, they turned the firearms on themselves. In his book ‘Columbine’, Dave Cullen analyses how and why Eric and Dylan massacred the victims at the school. When viewed in hindsight, events such as this are inspected to every minute detail; there are always ways in which the outcome could be changed.

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

In Roper v. Simmons there are two issues that must be addressed, the first being the issue of moral maturity and culpability. The defense in the trial phase of this case argued that Mr. Simmons was an at an age where he was not responsible enough to fully understand the effects and consequences of his actions. The majority draws on Atkins v. Virginia to argue that this specific precedent supports their case that the death penalty should not be imposed on the mentally immature or impaired. However, an important point to be made is that the Atkins v. Virginia decision is geared towards the clinical definition of mental retardation: significant limitations that limit adaptive skills. Also, another important question to consider is the competency and premeditation of Mr. Simmons’ crime in this case.

Read More
1119 Words | 5 Pages

In 1989, The Supreme Court decided the Penry v. Lynaugh case. Penry, the petitioner, was convicted of rape and murder and was sentenced to death. It was found that Penry, in a competency evaluation, was mentally retarded, known today as intellectually disabled, with an IQ of 54 (Penry v. Lynaugh,1989). Despite Penry’s IQ, the jury found that Penry was competent to proceed and further sentenced him to death. Although there was also an insanity plea, the jury rejected the defense and again sentenced him to death.

Read More
1669 Words | 7 Pages

What exactly is the insanity defense? In a criminal trial situation the insanity defense is used to explain that the defendant was not responsible for his or her actions at the time the crime was committed due to a mental health illness or a mental handicap. Now you have to think of the reasoning, is this form of defense used as an actual defense for one who irresponsibly committed a crime or as a last resort hoping for an acquittal before a defendant is about to be handed a guilty verdict? Most people being asked would say it is being used for sane people trying to get out of a crime they committed, but I believe the insanity defense is misunderstood by society and should strictly be used for its creation of mentally ill individuals.

Read More
889 Words | 4 Pages

School Shootings: How We All Miss the Point... The aftermath of a school shooting is tragic, depressing, and causes hatred for the lives lost and the person who took them. Everyone, especially the media, tries to interpret why the shooter killed their victims, or why they felt the need to end others’ lives and their own. How We All Miss the Point on School Shootings, by Mark Manson, explains what and why these mass shootings happen. He starts by using examples of shootings and the murderer’s past.

Read More
1035 Words | 5 Pages

Should the Not Criminally Responsible Law Remain in Canada? As of 1992, the Canadian Criminal Justice system introduced a new Law to its Criminal Code. NCR stands for “Not Criminally Responsible.” It is defined in section 16 of the Criminal Code."

Read More
1347 Words | 6 Pages

The verdict basically classifies as the same as finding someone guilty. This consideration turned into an alternative to the insanity defense, with no real benefit to the criminal defendants. If someone classifies as guilty but mentally ill, he or she will be sent to prison, no matter what the situation. In a murder case, there even remains a possibility of even a death sentence, whether or not the victim’s family/friends decide to be for or against it. If no death penalty presents, the villain attains mental health services the entire time they occupy prison.

Read More

More about Early Life And Psychological Issues In Jared Loughner's Case

Related Topics

Open Document