Scientific Theory Vs Conspiracy Theory Essay

1177 Words5 Pages

“I promise that whatever I have put here in the semifinal requirement will not substantially differ from the final draft of my evaluative research paper.”_____________________ (Sign with your ball pen after printing.) [Delete everything within brackets; i-erase tanan nga naa sulod sa brackets []; single-spaced] INTRODUCTION Background: The flat earth society movement is emerging and many people all around the globe are being convinced of its conspiracy. Problem: The flat earth conspiracy theory is hypothetical, unscientific, and irrational Support statement for problem: Conspiracy theories aren’t based on solid scientific evidence, but on theoretical, political, and cultic backgrounds, that essentially causes men and women to lose trust in the government, scientists, and …show more content…

Answer: A conspiracy theory relies on wishful thinking, while a scientific theory relies on facts and evidence in regards to making a conclusion. PARAGRAPH 1 Source: The earth is a flat disk centered at the North Pole and bounded along its 'southern' edge by a wall of ice, with the sun, moon, planets, and stars only a few hundred miles above the surface of the earth. Paraphrase: According to Samuel Rowbotham (1800), The earth is flat. Rowbotham was inspired by the literal interpretation of the Judeo-Christian scripture, and so, in all possibilities, the ancient flat earth theory might actually be true and our modern understanding of astronomy might be false. Addition 1: This means that the scientific community and the authorities (e.g., government, scientists, media) have been lying to us the whole