Edmund Burke vs. Thomas Paine The French Revolution brought controversy to the world. With the constitution completed and election of a new national assemble the declaration of war with Austria had led to controversy over the fate of the new republic. Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine both tried to persuade the revolution in different ways in their books. Burke advocates the government and human rights exist separately, he also opposed the rapid changes of the French revolution believing that gradual reform and traditions are key. Paine promotes the French revolution while talking about human rights and the excess use of tradition and privilege in government. Edmund Burke believes that Natural rights and government are separate in their own respects, and government is not created in spite of natural rights. This is to say that the government is not responsible for the natural rights of its citizens and is very hard to distinguish from civil order. This opposes the revolutions ideology and the ideas of a constitution which state its government’s responsibility to govern the natural rights of its citizens and make sure all are treated fair. He also believes in the gradual reform of government and not the drastic changes of the revolution. He goes on to state that the …show more content…
He focuses on the concept of universal human rights and undermines the age old traditions of privilege in government. He believes it is the government’s job to protect the natural rights as well as the civil rights of its citizens. “Hitherto we have spoken of the natural rights of man. We have to consider the civil rights of man, and to show how the one originates from the other.”(645). Unlike Burke he sees that civil and natural coexist and come from each other. The civil rights are those given by the government and saying they coexist with the natural rights undermines Burke as he says that government exists separately from natural