Both Nell Irvin Painter and Kristin L. Hoganson have two different prospective on the annexation of the Philippines. Painter’s approach of explaining the annexation was more of an economic view rather then Hoganson’s, which was a more sexiest view. An example of Painter’s view is when he said,” the culprit, it seemed, was agricultural and industrial overproduction” (Painter). He is saying the America simply produced too much, and they did not care. Business thought taking over The Philippines would help American gain access to trading with China.
A president is truly affective when he is able to get his policy agenda through Congress. For him to do this, it is paramount that he has the support from the majority of the public. When a president is unpopular, members of Congress will have little incentive to pass his preferred legislation, since doing so will potentially have negative consequences for them (i.e. not winning reelection). It is also important that the president be a competent negotiator if he is to get his agenda passed. It is unrealistic for a president to expect that he will get all aspects of a particular agenda item passed without making his concessions.
should not let the Filipinos read the Declaration of Independence because they would mock us for our inconsistency. The constitution opposes the actions of the Americans while they are “helping” the Filipinos. To add on, “The National Park Services” states in their article “The American Anti-Imperialist League at Faneuil Hall” that “the United States had been founded upon and needed to extend to foreign policy as well" (NPS). The United States betrays the people that they were supposed to help and has lost the majority of their trust in their relationships with other countries. It can be noted that the U.S. should not annex the Philippines because it would go against their values and norms.
The Philippines had been fighting for their freedom against the Spanish for many years. Naturally, when America defeated the Spaniards in the war, the Filipinos rejoiced at the thought that they may be able to finally return safely and peacefully back to their home, Manila. Where this information comes from in the text, would be: “These Filipinos believed that
The Government is the ultimate ruler of the people, sets the ultimate laws of the land and says what goes and when not pleased uses all the means in their power to influence. The basic functions of the United States government are listed in the Constitution. Due to the immense power of our federal government, people often argue that it is too powerful and should be lessened. Sub further the state governments use a sum of power to do the same. There has been an effort to shift power from the federal government to the states.
Over the year’s federalism has taken on many forms within our federal system. The distribution of powers within these many forms of federal systems has had to adapt to each of these forms in order to keep up with the times. The federal system initially was set up to serve the 13 original colonies and was able to maintain their own powers given by the powers vested in each colonies individual constitutions. Federalism or the split of power between colonies and the federal or nation governing body was simply to form agreements among one another in regards to laws. The state governments possessed the powers given to them by their state constitutions which was known as reserved powers and concurrent powers were state and federal government
“The U.S. version of extreme decentralization not only places us in the minority among nations but also attracts criticism as being too complex, inefficient, and expensive” (Reichel, 2013).
The danger of transformation from underneath pushed the Philippines to seek after political change. Furthermore, the unfurling position and dispute, wherever it leads, will without a doubt have significant implications long ways past China's
Federalism is a structure of government that divides power between a central governing authority and other integral political units such as provinces or states. This government system was developed after the Articles of Confederation received harsh criticisms because of the lack of power granted to the federal government. According to this model of government neither level of government, state or federal, can interfere with the affairs that are not within their division of responsibility. Dual federalism is an accurate depiction of the early stages of the American governmental system.
(a.) The purpose of the Tenth Amendment is to delegate many powers to the states. In the Amendment, it is said that any power not delegated to the national government that is not prohibited to the states, is given to the states to carry out. If a power is not given or restricted, it is constitutionally a state power. The Tenth Amendment is intended to contribute to federalism by giving the states a broad and extensive set of powers. The powers are much more numerous than the specific ones delegated to the national government.
An Overview on Federalism Through the PH Debate Context The problem with concepts in political science like federalism is it’s taken for granted. When advocates and critics debate the pros and cons of federalism in the country, it seems as if it’s a straightforward issue and idea, devoid of nuances. Indeed, the need for clarification and understanding of the concept is important to raise the level of its discussion in our society. Paleker provided a conceptual analysis of federalism by delineating and integrating three theories seeking to explain it (309).
The federal system of the United States is defined in the Constituition as federalism. Although the word federalism never appears in the Constituion it is one of the fundamental concepts. The federal system, or federalism, is defined as the distribution of power in an organization (such as a government) between a central authority and the constituent. The United States federal system, formulated by the framers of the Constitution consisted of the different enumerated and reserved powers granted in the Constitution. As time has marched on, federalism has evovled into a form of national supremacy where the Supreme Court, based on previously established policies and amendments, can force the states to overturn a previously established law.
After the Articles of Confederation, which did not hold up the United States, the Constitution was born. The Constitution introduced federalism as a way to divide the powers between the national and state governments. It has issued the balance that the United States has needed since 1787. Without federalism, all branches of government would abuse their power over many political decisions.
Different peoples perceive things differently. Definitions of federalism also vary according to individuals but most researchers agree that federalism means the existence of two separate autonomy in government body, local and state governments. Hueglin and Fenna in their research argue that both entity shared the same sovereignty and division of power (cited in Law, 2013) but on certain degree, state government possessed the authority to override decisions made by local governments. The origin of the theory of federalism begins with the cooperation on finding solutions regarding national unification between Italy and Germany in late nineteenth century which has brought upon an alternative attempts on theorizing federalism as a "...vertical
It is perhaps opportunely that our government is able to push through boundaries and traditions to come up with resolutions and better policies/laws. All this time, the Philippine Economy has been deemed to have strong growth hindered by political uncertainties. This is so true. We have a potential to be great and yet we still move slow towards our development and sustainability. Our country has its own strengths and weaknesses that affect positively and/or negatively our over-all status.
