“Ethical Egoism is the theory that morality of an act is determined by one’s self interest.” Rae, (2009 p 67). Rae goes on to clarify that this theory is not egotistical or narcissistic. If Angela makes her decision based on this theory she will not worry about the consequences of her actions, just how it will affect her. She may decide to abort the children fearing that it would negatively affect her now and in the future.
The word ego is defined as “A person’s self-esteem or self-importance”. Everybody in the world has a different level of ego. Some have very high self worth, while others have very low self worth. This means an ego sets us all apart and makes us different. An egoist is defined as “A doctrine that individual self-interest is the valid end of all actions.”
Nonetheless, no one can speak on behalf of the agent or “even be certain what conscious motives” dictate their actions (Feinberg, 588). Though a psychological egoist would defend that desires are the sole reason for a person to commit an action, non-psychological egoists would respond with the (notion) that certain actions can be self interest driven but others can be purely selfless and
Ego is a weed we cultivate for it to ultimately be destroyed. It is said to be the root of our sins, but is really the cause of individuality in this world. Egoists tend to separate themselves from others; we made egos to experience ourselves as different, rather than the ordinary being. Egos are depicted to reflect a bad connotation. In the novella Anthem by Ayn Rand, the protagonist, Equality 7-2521, is an egoist, but not in the way expected.
Abortion remains one of the most controversial issues in our society today. Pro-life supporters are those who are against abortion and who believe abortion is in all cases wrong. Pro-choice supporters are those who are in favor of abortion and who believes that whatever a woman does with her body is her choice. Patricia Bauer and Don Marquis are both scholars who wrote in depth articles explaining their views on abortion in an effort to spur their audience into action. Even though the both share same views, they use different and strong rhetorical strategies, mainly logos, ethos, and pathos, to get their message across their audience and to show the effectiveness and seriousness of their arguments.
Unwind by Neal Shusterman takes place in a post Civil War II America years after the Bill of Life was passed, making unwinding a legal and socially acceptable practice. This integration of Unwinding manipulates the people into separating any child that was deemed unwanted by their homes into an oppressive environment that views them as less than human. Society’s own ignorance allows them to live guilt free from the emotionally damaging deaths that children as young as thirteen are forced to endure. Abortion is constantly brought into question throughout the novel via characters’ perspectives and overarching themes that connect the Unwinds to the world around them. Putting a new perspective on abortion by imagining a world that has to make do
Howard Roark makes egoism very clear, saying that “Egoism was held to mean the sacrifice of others to self.” Through the understanding of this quote, one can reach the conclusion that any act that benefits oneself, regardless of its simplicity, displays the traits associated with egoism. Roark also makes clear the pure simplicity of the ego, elaborating that ”To think, to feel, to judge, to act are functions of the ego.” Thus, any independent act is a fundamental function of egoism. Even things as insignificant as having emotions or making decisions.
Most abortion arguments discussed today revolve around the premise that a fetus is a human being at conception. In Judith Thomson’s essay, “A Defense to Abortion”, she argues on the topic of abortions. She defends the mother’s right to choose what happens to her body on the assumption that a baby becomes a human at conception. In the argument, she gives the famous Violinist analogy. I will argue in this essay that her argumentative analogy is not sound because of the difference in social importance.
Controversy surrounds almost every modern issue we face. One of the most controversial topics is abortion. Some believe that women should get the choice to abort their baby and others believe that abortion should be outlawed as they see it as a form of murder. In the article “Government had no role in my late-term abortion struggle. Let's keep it that way” by Brie Loskota, she discusses her perspective on abortion.
Saanvi Kumar GT-ILA 8 Advanced Ms. Arndorfer 10 March 2023 Rhetoric in Pro-Life Claims Debated throughout the last century, abortion has drawn a thin line between human rights and murder. In the 1973 Supreme court case Roe v. Wade, Norma McCorvey, also known as Jane Roe, challenged Henry Wade about the legal status of abortion. Abortion’s status changed from illegal to legal after the closing of the case. However, in 2022, the Supreme Court overturned the decision, causing a divide within the country and resulting in pro-choice and pro-life beliefs. Chuck Fleischmann, a congressman from Tennessee, and the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), compellingly communicate with viewers about pro-life views using emotional appeal to convey feelings
James Rachels argued that Ethical Egoism is not accepted as a moral theory. Ethical Egoism believes that individuals should live their life, concentrating on whatever brings the most benefit to that individual. Rachels takes for example a racist to disputed Ethical Egoism, which is discriminating treatments are justified when there is a substantial difference between the people. But there is none of them, so racist is an arbitrary as Ethical Egoism is. We cannot find substantial difference between us, so we should aware that other people’s need should be satisfied as mine because of we are the equal.
Ethical egoism is a moral theory focused on improving a person’s well-being. There are many arguments for ethical egoism such as the Self-Reliance Argument and the Best Argument for Ethical Egoism, both presented by Shafer-Landau in The Fundamentals of Ethics. However, in this paper I will discuss how objections presented by Shafer-Landau and Dr. Thomas Carson are fatal to ethical egoism, while keeping in mind arguments for this moral theory. I will discuss objections such as ethical egoism permitting or sometimes requiring murder, theft, or rape, in order to promote oneself’s well-being, egoists subconscious belief of their lives being more important than others, and an argument presented in class that if egoists must do what is best for their
Abortion is a huge problem, not just in the United States but also all over the world. Abortion is a termination of a pregnancy, usually within the first 28 weeks. Some people believe abortion is murder, while others believe it is not. Abortion is a social problem. In order to be a social problem, the issue must affect a group of people.
Abortion can be categorized as both a legal, and ethical issue. Being such a controversial topic some might argue that abortion should be considered murder, while others simply see it as a way to get rid of a problem. Religion plays a large part in the ethical issue of abortion, just like with any other ethical problem, religion plays a large part of the decisions we make in everyday life. Keeping this in mind we can say religion, and a person’s ethical view of life plays a large part in the decision of having an abortion. In this paper I will discuss the ethical views on abortion, Marquis’s argument, and look at the different ethical views from different points of views on the topic.
“Abortion -should it be a right of every woman in the present context- A critical analysis” 1. Introduction I elected to present my dissertation on a topic based on ‘abortion’ since it is a hidden social menace in our society. It is like an iceberg. The tip represents the reported abortions, which everyone sees.
