ipl-logo

Elaboration Likelihood Model Paper

2147 Words9 Pages

Expert witnesses and their importance in creating an influential and persuasive argument
Nathan J. Sommi
Kanas State University
5/1/2015

Abstract

How do you convince someone you are an expert? Is it the language you use? The terminology you use in explanations? The confidence you display? The title you hold? These are all questions that a lawyer must take into consideration when he or she puts an expert witness on the stand. This paper will delve into the different elements that make an expert witness influential and persuasive to judges and juries alike, mainly focusing on how important establishing credibility, the Elaboration Likelihood Model’s influential ability, vivid narratives, and how leadership and …show more content…

ELM is a dual process model that emphasizes two routes to persuasion and is centered on the idea that as individuals we are cognitive misers, or that individuals think the bare amount. The first route is the central route: attitudes are changed by having the motivation and ability to be able to process complex information, and is heavily based on evidence and logic. The second route is the Peripheral route: Where the individual lacks the motivation and ability to process the information and instead uses heuristic, mental shortcuts, to decide on their belief (The Effects of Structural and Grammatical Variables on Persuasion: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective, pg. 350). Depending on the type of trial, it is important to keep the ELM model in mind for trial …show more content…

A position of leadership or authority, and the power associated with it can lead to a view of unmistakable credibility. In communication studies, power is defined as the ability to influence others (Leadership: A communication perspective, pg. 136). Leadership is impossible without power; therefore it is important to choose an expert witness that carries a lot of power with them.
There are five main types of power used, but the focus should be a leader who can use legitimate power (positional power), expert power which is based on credibility and credentials, and/or referent power, or someone who is admired by many others and depends on feelings of affection, esteem, and respect (Leadership: A communication perspective, pg. 141). When a expert witness is challenged during the cross-examination, the opposing attorney will more than likely ask questions to make the expert seem less

Show More
Related

New Jersey Vs Cavallo Case Study

645 Words | 3 Pages

Arguments: The State argues that “proffered evidence” of Dr. Kuris’ expert testimony is irrelevant because Cavallo may have committed rape on this specific encounter regardless if he does not possess rapist characteristics. The defendants argue that the reliability of scientific expert testimony should determine the importance, not admissibility. Issue: Whether, (1) Dr. Kuris’ expert testimony is relevant as an expert opinion evidence of Cavallo’s character under the ruling of Rule 47? (2) Did Dr. Kuris’ expert testimony satisfy the special limitations on expert evidence under the ruling of Rule 56 (2) and New Jersey case law? (3) Did Dr. Kuris’ expert testimony achieve general acceptance in the scientific community to convince the court that it is reasonably

Read More

Summary Of Terrance Bogan's Being Mommy Behind Bars

1497 Words | 6 Pages

Testimony is the elements or opinion of experts in the field that is discussed. Testimony is a recurring element Bogans uses throughout his essay. He makes a bold move of offering testimony against his thesis or claim but also offers testimony supporting his claim. A notable place Bogans

Read More

What Are The Facts Of Lavallee Court Case

1404 Words | 6 Pages

v Lavallee (1990), expert testimony is admissible if the evidence is relevant to the case, even if it is based on hearsay. Though the appellant did not testify, rule 804 of the Federal Rules of Evidence allows hearsay statements to be considered in the event that the appellant refuses to testify (Matson, 2004). The hearsay evidence assists the expert in determining their opinion, but it is not used as evidence to the existence of the facts. As long as there is some admissible evidence to the expert’s testimony, the jury or judge cannot ignore it – the greater matter is determining how much weight should be given to the testimony. The judge is required to warn the jury of the reliability and credibility of the information, and to determine a weight at which the jury should use to influence their decision regarding the case (Ottawa L. Rev.,

Read More

What Caused 9/11 In Peter Bergen's Could It Happen Again?

1065 Words | 5 Pages

This testimony helps draw the reader in and give them the mindset of, “well if an expert believes this, I should as

Read More

FRE 704 V PA Rules Of Evidence

547 Words | 3 Pages

A mental health expert in a criminal trial may offer an opinion on the ultimate legal issue of whether the defendant did or did not have a mental state or condition that constitutes an element of the crime charged or of a defense PA rules of evidence adopted the FRE 704(A) which states that an opinion is not objectionable just because it embraces an ultimate issue. (704(a)). PA rules of evidence does not adopt FRE 704B. However, PA courts have ruled that expert testimony, which concerns a defendant's mental capacity to form the type of specific intent a conviction for murder of the first degree requires, significantly advance the inquiry as to the presence or absence of an essential element of the crime, resulting in relevant testimony. (Commonwealth v. Walzack). In this criminal case a mental health expert is prepared to offer an opinion on the whether the defendant was insane at the time of the offense.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Scott Fraser

1835 Words | 8 Pages

in state and federal courts” (Can Eyewitnesses Create Memories?). His expertise in fallible memory, in addition to his experience with criminal and civil court cases, establish a solid foundation of ethos. To further strengthen his ethos, Mr. Fraser uses a court case in which he was personally invested in, adding in the Nine Eleven Attacks as a supporting example. In his speech, Scott Fraser states, “A good forensic expert also has to be a good educator, a good communicator…” which can be found on paragraph 8 of the transcript.

Read More

How Does Daubert Impact On Forensic Science

584 Words | 3 Pages

The assessment of an affirmed expert capability in his or her field is not a novel idea, and it is well inside of the capacities of our skilled federal judiciary. Once a judge has chosen a witness is qualified to serve as a specialist, Daubert requires the judge to make an autonomous appraisal to "guarantee that any experimental confirmation or proof conceded is important, as well as solid. This includes an examination of the philosophy fundamental the expert assessment to figure out if it uses legitimate experimental techniques and strategies. Daubert recommends a few components to help government judges in assessing whether a specific experimental hypothesis or study is solid: (1) its observational testability; (2) whether the hypothesis or study has been distributed or subjected to associate survey; (3) whether the known or potential rate of mistake is

Read More

The Outcome Of Eroy Brown's Trial

1493 Words | 6 Pages

Eroy Brown was a convicted murderer who faced several trials throughout his life. The outcome of his trials was influenced by several factors, including the evidence presented in court, the jurors’ biases, and the actions of the prosecution and defense. One of the most significant factors that influenced the outcome of Eroy Brown’s trials was the evidence presented in court. In some cases, the evidence was conclusive and left no doubt as to Brown’s guilt or innocence. For example, in one of his trials, Brown was convicted of murdering a fellow inmate based on eyewitness testimony and physical evidence found at the scene of the crime.

Read More

What Is The Ethos In Chapter 3 Of Everything's An Argument

362 Words | 2 Pages

This task can be difficult if the audience is unknown. To establish one’s authority, when making an argument, one must show that they have sold and credible knowledge about the topic being discussed. This can be done by “attaching titles to their names, for example, subtly builds authority by saying they hold medical or legal engineering

Read More

'Plea Bargain In A Few Good Men'

770 Words | 4 Pages

Joanne sat with Downey and trained him to answer questions quickly. In the chapter, we learned that the judge can decide whether a witness is an expert or not. In the movie, the judge ordered the doctor as an expert even though Kaffee did not agree. The movie really emphasized how hard it is to get

Read More

Persuasion In Martin Luther King's Letter From A Birmingham Jail

1852 Words | 8 Pages

Persuasion is a highly important tool to anyone whose main focus is to vocalize a point of view and have others support the argument that is being asserted. There are several different kinds of persuasion techniques, such as anchoring, which is the "human tendency to rely too heavily on the piece of information presented first when making a decision, and once the anchor is set, there's a bias toward that value" (Sanders 2017). It is dependent on the situation, though, which technique is more or less effective. Because persuasion is such a universally important skill to have, especially within the realms of commercialism, the advertising industry, and politics, figuring out more effective persuasive techniques is something that many people

Read More

Examples Of Ethos Pathos Logos

924 Words | 4 Pages

There are three proofs of persuasion which can be identified as ethos, pathos, and logos. Each proof contributes in their own way to the study of rhetoric. The first proof is ethos which is relevant to the study of rhetoric because a speaker will provide their audience with credibility of the source they are using. This is important so the audience knows the information is coming from a reliable source.

Read More

The Iliad Rhetorical Analysis

697 Words | 3 Pages

Convincing someone on believing that one persons’ opinion is more correct than someone else’s is a very large aspect of life now. Persuasion can become very useful when deciphering with other people in someone’s everyday

Read More

Competency To Stand Trial Essay

1862 Words | 8 Pages

The expert is often asked to give their experienced opinion on hypothetical questions related to the case, based on the facts presented. However, the “hearsay rule” designates that they were not allowed to disclose information that was obtained outside of court (Johnston and Sartwelle 2013). Other than this rule that governs all court processes, there are few regulations regarding the expert’s testimony. As long as the opinions of the experts were relevant and reliable in the realm of the expert’s field, it would be acceptable (Johnston and Sartwelle 2013). As a result, expert witness controls great power in the court room.

Read More

Elaboration Likelihood Model Of Persuasion Essay

817 Words | 4 Pages

CHAPTER III Framework This chapter shows and discusses the theories, the theoretical paradigm, the conceptual framework and the operational definition that will be utilized in this research. The study will be assimilating the following theories: Elaboration likelihood model (Petty & Cacippo, 1986); hierarchy of advertising effects model (Thorson et al., 1992) and; music theory (synthesis). A. Theoretical Framework I. Elaboration Likelihood Model Elaboration likelihood model of persuasion or ELM is a dual process model developed by psychologists Richard Petty and John Cacioppo in the 1970s, defining how a medium or a person’s presentation of the message forms and changes the receiver’s attitude.

Read More

More about Elaboration Likelihood Model Paper

Related Topics

Open Document