Brief background of the accused Lindy Chamberlain and her husband Michael were both born in New Zealand. They were married on 19 November, 1969. Shortly after their marriage, they moved to Tasmania where they lived for 5 years. During that time, their first child Aiden was born in 1973.
Williams went in, he found Mr. Arms dead on the floor. He was also able to do it because he was the only one there and he worked there so he knew where all the stuff was. Next, the Coroner found David Eldridge fingerprints on some of the stuff Mr. Arms was killed with. Mr. Arms lost a lot of blood and there was a large wound across his throat from a metal spatula.
Crime scene investigators reported that a metal spatula was found on the floor by the body. Also, David Eldridge said that he stole a spatula from Mr. Arm’s restaurant and never gave it back. Later, it was reported that David Eldridge had the same spatula at his house with the blood on it and all. This evidence proves that David Eldridge had to have killed Mr. Arms, or somehow have been involved with giving someone else the spatula to do so since the murder weapon was that same spatula.
On June 2, 1961, some items stolen from Bay Harbor Pool Room, such as five dollars and a few bottles of beer and soda. Henry Cook told the police that he had seen Clarence Gideon walk out of the pool hall with a bottle and his pockets filled with coins, then got into a taxi and left. Gideon was later taken to court, and when he asked for an attorney to defend him he was told that in the state of Florida,you can only be appointed an attorney if you are charged with a capital offense. Since he was only charged with breaking and entering,burglary,and the intent to commit petty larceny,he was not provided one. He did his best to represent himself in the case, but was found guilty and sentenced to 5 years in the state prison.
The perpetrator left a fingerprint on the doorknob of one of the victim’s bedroom doors and a herringbone pattern tennis shoe print in one of the victim’s front yard near the front door. The police questioned about thirty to forty men in the area and focused on one main suspect, Hayes. The police went to Hayes home and requested a fingerprint, and Hayes
Today the trial, Scott V. Missouri, which was Dred Scott, a slave owned by Irene Emerson, suing for his freedom, had taken place. The trial had started out with a witness for prosecution, who stated that due to Dred Scott’s status as a slave, that he didn’t have any rights within the constitution. He went on to claim that the constitution only covered people and therefore, Dred Scott was only considered property and had no rights. In addition, the witness made the argument that due to Missouri law, Dred Scott was still considered a slave since he still resides within Missouri. During their argument, the Supreme Court questioned the witness about what the definition of a person was in the constitution and whose job it was to debate the Constitution.
Social media plays a larger role in our daily life. The question of how free we are when we express ourselves online also becomes an issue and the fact of the First Amendment of the US law is freedom of speech. One of the cases covered two problems is Elonis v. the United States. The case named Anthony Douglas Elonis; Petitioner v. the United States was argued on December 1, 2014.
In June 21, 1973, Miller was convicted on the ground of advertising the sale of what was considered by the court as adult material. He was found guilty as he broke the California Statute. The California Statute forbids citizens from spreading what is considered offensive in societal standards. The question that was being asked was that if the action of Miller was Constitution thus is protected under the law. However, he lost the case due to a vote of 5 - 4.
Dred Scott v. Sandford is one of the darkest cases in the history of the Supreme Court. After years of slavery, parts of the United States were beginning to head in a direction away from slavery. The establishment of the Missouri Compromise and gaining some territories as slave states and others as free states, was proof of this shift from slavery, especially in the north (Pearson Education Inc. 2005). The Scott v. Sandford decision, in which an African American man was denied both his freedom and his citizenship to the United States, did not link up with this new way of thinking.
In 1846, Scott sued his and his family’s freedom, but was rejected by the Supreme Court 11 years later. The final ruling had an immense impact politically, economically and socially. (Bell. “Civil War on the Western Border”). Chief Justice Roger B. Taney wrote an opinion against Scott, which makes logical sense since he is a southerner.
The duty of any criminal prosecutor is to seek justice. A conviction is the end of justice being served prior to sentencing; however justice cannot be served if an innocent person is found guilty. Even though the prosecutor(s) are there to represent the public and has the duty to aggressively pursue offenders for violations of state and federal laws, they shall never lose sight or their own moral compass of their main purpose is to find the truth. In the pursuit of truth, the United States Supreme Court has developed or made rulings in reference to several principles of conduct which have to be followed by all prosecutors to assure that the accused person(s) are allowed the proper procedures and due process of the law granted by the 14th Amendment.
State vs. Mayfield Trial On December 27th, 1989, State Police Officer Edward Mayfield pulled over Donna Nugent to a shady area where he strangled her and threw her body off of a bridge. We don’t know why he pulled her over. He then proceeded to strangle her with a rope. I believe State Police Officer Edward Mayfield is guilty of murder in the first degree because he had and hid the murder weapon, pulling over specifically blonde women, and he changed the activity log.
he Dred Scott decision of 1857 was a significant decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court that declared that blacks, regardless of whether they were free or a slave, had no legal standing because they were not American citizens. The decision was not the first to be made regarding Dred Scott; a Missouri jury ruled in Scott 's favour when Scott claimed that his residence in Illinois and Wisconsin made him free, but the state supreme court ruled against him, which lead to the case being escalated to the US Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court ruled against Scott 7-2. The Dred Scott decision is considered a landmark decision and is indicative of the tumultuous political climate of the time.
I have found that Tuesday is named after the The Norse God Tyr. Tyr was believed to be a chief God in that pantheon and considered to be a war god for a period of time When the Vikings were at their peak Tyr was associated with law and glory. The Germanic tribes considered him to be the sky god and was equal to the Greek god Zeus. Tuesday is governed by the planet Mars and the correspondences follow the fire sign with many of the herbs being pungent or prickly such as peppers and cacti. This day is associated with the colors of fire, reds and oranges and all shades of these which will include the pinks, peaches, and corals.
There is no one name for the case of Frank Abagnale. He was tried in France, Sweden, Italy, and then finally the United States. Therefore, it is reasonable to call the case The United States versus Frank Abagnale. He was accused of bank fraud, identity fraud, and professional con artist. A great criminal always starts young.
