ipl-logo

Who Was David Eldridge's Guilty?

398 Words2 Pages

In David Eldridge's house, they found some evidence. David even works at the Family Fun restaurant and that's also where Mr. Arms works. The restaurant was always busy, but David Eldridge never got a raise. David Eldridge was always mad at Mr. Arms. David Eldridge is guilty because there is enough evidence proving that he murdered Mr. Arms. First, David Eldridge is guilty because he was found in the restaurant before Mr. Arms death. William Warden saw David Eldridge enter the Family Fun restaurant two hours before Mr. Armes was found dead. An hour later, he heard Mr. Armes screaming loudly. After waiting a while, Warden went into the restaurant to investigate, and that’s when he found the dead body. Mr Warden saw David enter the restaurant two hours before so he could …show more content…

Williams went in, he found Mr. Arms dead on the floor. He was also able to do it because he was the only one there and he worked there so he knew where all the stuff was. Next, the Coroner found David Eldridge fingerprints on some of the stuff Mr. Arms was killed with. Mr. Arms lost a lot of blood and there was a large wound across his throat from a metal spatula. The metal spatula had a lot of fingerprints on it, which were David Eldridge's. Inside David Eldridge’s home, investigators found a spatula with traces of Mr. Armes’s blood on it. The spatula handle had Eldridge’s fingerprints, as well as Mr. Armes’s. Investigators found a spatula in David Eldridge's house and it had traces of Mr. Arms's blood on it, which means he would have done it. David Eldridge wouldn’t just take Mr. Arms’ blood for no reason. On the spatula, there were only Mr. Eldridge's fingerprints on the spatula. He also has access to the spatula because he works at the Family Fun restaurant. Please consider the reasons and evidence presented that David Eldridge committed this crime. There was a spatula in David Eldridge’s house with his and Mr. Arms’ fingerprints. William Warden even heard screaming from the

Show More
Related

David Eldridge V. Cambridge Court Case

550 Words | 3 Pages

William Warden, a witness in this case, saw David Eldridge enter the restaurant before Mr Armes's death and an hour later Mr Armes's screams were heard. In addition, after a while, he decided to check out the restaurant and found Mr. Armes dead. If David Eldridge did not commit the crime then why did someone witness him with their own eyes entering the restaurant before Mr Armes was dead and then the witness found him dead a while after screams were heard from Mr Armes? The next reason is that there was no sign of a break-in and David and Mr Armes were the only people with keys.

Read More

To What Extent Was David Eldridge Guilty

439 Words | 2 Pages

Crime scene investigators reported that a metal spatula was found on the floor by the body. Also, David Eldridge said that he stole a spatula from Mr. Arm’s restaurant and never gave it back. Later, it was reported that David Eldridge had the same spatula at his house with the blood on it and all. This evidence proves that David Eldridge had to have killed Mr. Arms, or somehow have been involved with giving someone else the spatula to do so since the murder weapon was that same spatula.

Read More

Eldridge V. Arms Case Essay

656 Words | 3 Pages

This only proves that Mr. Eldridge had committed the crime because according to William Warden, Mr. Eldridge and Mr. Arms were the only two people to have keys to the establishment. If Mr. Eldridge hadn’t killed Mr. Arms, why were his fingerprints on the spatula? With Mr. Eldridge’s prints being at the scene, and there being no sign of a break-in, it leads me to believe that he is the one responsible for Mr. Arms’s death. The next reason that Mr. Eldridge is guilty of Mr. Arms' murder is that he has a motive and the motive is that Mr. Eldridge had asked for a raise because his house was getting repossessed and he was in desperate need of money but was denied, leaving him to be upset. According to Mrs. Sandy Smith, Mr. David Eldridge had asked for a raise from Mr. Arms but was denied.

Read More

David Eldridge Research Paper

493 Words | 2 Pages

This shows that David Eldridge had a motive to kill Mr. Armes and was angry at him, causing him to commit cold-blooded murder. In addition, David Eldridge is the only person who could have murdered Mr. Armes. According to the Police Investigator, there were no signs of forced entry, and Mr. Armes and David Eldridge were the only ones with a key. David Eldridge’s fingerprints were found on the metal spatula used to kill Mr. Armes, and he is the only person other than the man who was killed who knew the code to the safe.

Read More

Steve Harmon Is Not Guilty In 'Monster' By Walter Dean Myers

476 Words | 2 Pages

Now, one thing that doesn’t help prove his innocence is that we don’t know where he was during the robbery. When asked about his location he states: “ I don’t know exactly where I was when the robbery took place…”And it doesn’t help that the only people who testify to his location are saying that he was involved in the robbery. But as previously stated, everyone who testifies against him has reason to lie and everything they say is within the realm of reasonable

Read More

David Eldridge Is Guilty

332 Words | 2 Pages

There are multiple strong pieces of evidence proving this to be true. These pieces of evidence prove that Mr. Eldridge is guilty. David Eldridge is guilty of Mr Armes’ murder. The strongest piece of evidence is the fact that David Eldridge had a spatula with Mr.Armes’ blood on it.

Read More

How Is David Eldridge Guilty

637 Words | 3 Pages

My second reason why Mr. Eldridge is guilty is that there was no sign of a break-in, in the restaurant, and the only people who had keys to the restaurant were Mr. Arms and David Eldridge. Mr. Arms was the last one in the restaurant when William Warden saw David Eldridge walk into the restaurant. Then Mr Warden heard screams and when he went into the restaurant he found Mr. Arms's dead body. This proves that David Eldridge and Mr. Arms were the only two in the restaurant at the time of his death. This also shows why there were no signs of a break-in because David Eldridge didn’t need to break in because he could just use his key.

Read More

Steve Harmon's Monster In Walter Dean Myers Monster

689 Words | 3 Pages

People said he was not guilty but that really doesn't mean he is innocent. He was still involved in the robbery and was in the store that day no matter which way you look at

Read More

Evidence In The Case Against Adnan Syed Casey

735 Words | 3 Pages

We tried to make a determination ourselves as to guilt or innocence. I believe that the evidence showed that Adnan is innocent and Jay Wilds and Jay’s attorney/lawyer were responsible for the wrongful conviction of Adnan. They wrongfully convicted Adnan just to get a conviction for the crime, so they no longer had to deal with the case. They talked about stuff in court,

Read More

Guilty To Jury Members: David Eldiridge

692 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: In my opinion, David Eldiridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defense claims that he is innocent of this crime, they are incorrect because Eldridge had motive to kill Mr. Armes, there was no sign of a break-in, but all the money was gone and he had the key, and lastly, a witness had placed him at the scene near the time of the murder and his footprints were all around the body. First, David Eldridge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes because he was very angry after Mr. Armes hadn’t given him a raise and he needed money because the bank was going to repossess his house, so he could have stolen the recipe and robbed him to get the money. David was the only one that could get into the restaurant and rob Mr. Armes since he has the keys and the combo to the safe.

Read More

James King Guilty

108 Words | 1 Pages

James King is guilty because of the witness, Lorelle Henry’s testify. Sandra Petrocelli asks witness, Lorelle Henry, what had happened that day and what she overheard. Lorelle replies with, “The gentleman sitting at that table was one of the men arguing [points to King]” pg 164. Mrs. Henry- who had only gone to the store to get medicine for her sick granddaughter- had seen an argument between 2 men, one of them being identified as Mr.King, with the store owner. She left before anything got out of hand.

Read More

Christopher Simmons Supreme Court Case

837 Words | 4 Pages

Simmons confessed to the murder and how he did it. At the trial, the jury found him guilty. During the sentencing hearing, the defense attorneys asked the jury to use Simmons’ age as a factor and that he had no prior arrest reports so that Simmons would not receive the death penalty. Nevertheless, the jury focused on the brutal and aggravated

Read More

Mr. Bennet Should Be Found Not Guilty

404 Words | 2 Pages

The reasons and evidence all conclude that Mr. Bennet did not murder Mr. Adams. Mr. Alfaro is an exterminator and the rat poison is only available to exterminators, Mrs. Reid thought if Mr. Adams died then she would have all the money he owned and his new mansion, and Mr. Adams could have killed himself because of his bad eyesight. I urge you to find that the defendant, Mr. Bennet, should be found not

Read More

Murder On A Sunday Morning Analysis

681 Words | 3 Pages

As you are shown in the film, after the identification of Brenton Butler and his so-called testimony to investigators, the police and prosecutors just stopped working on the case. Thus, evidence that would have supported Butler’s innocence and help find the actual killer weren’t discovered until Brenton’s defense attorney, Pat McGuinness did some investigation and research of his own. Thus, flowing from film from the trial to McGuinness’s investigation scenes shows the how he attained the information that he and his partner could present in the courtroom. While the prosecutors only had the one eyewitness, who claimed to have only caught a glimpse of the shooter and gave description that did not even match Butler. The film presents the conclusion that the police did not actually do the work to find the actual killer and if it wasn’t for Pat McGuinness and his partner wanting to find the culprit, it would never actually be solved.

Read More

A Time To Kill Ethos Pathos Logos

1180 Words | 5 Pages

Sheriff Ozzie Walls was put into the trial as a witness. Logos, which persuade the targeted audience by employing reason or logic are used at this time. A gun that was found on scene of the crime proved to have Carl Lee Haley’s fingerprints. By using logos, the prosecution's argument was able to be supported. The fallacy to Appeal to Emotion was also used at this time.

Read More

More about Who Was David Eldridge's Guilty?

Open Document