ipl-logo

Mr. Bennet Should Be Found Not Guilty

404 Words2 Pages

Grady Cleveland 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748 May 15, 2023 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801 Dear Jury Members: Mr. Bennet should be found not guilty because there is reasonable doubt. Although the prosecution claims he is guilty, they are wrong because the rat poison is only available to exterminators and Mr. Alfaro is one, Mrs. Reid thought that she would inherit his wealth, and Mr. Adams has bad eyesight. My first reason is, Mr. Alfaro is an exterminator and the rat poison is only available to exterminators. Mr. Alfaro is an exterminator and the rat poison was only available to exterminators. Mr. Alfaro’s fingerprints were found on the cup, and he had poured the cup. Mr. Alfaro was invited to the party by …show more content…

Reid thought that if Mr. Adams died, then because she is the only one in his family she would inherit the wealth. Mrs. Reid believed that if Mr. Adams were to die, then she would inherit his wealth. Mrs. Reid had a history of spreading rumors about Mr. Adams. Mrs. Reid invited Mr. Alfaro to the party and they were seen whispering throughout the night. Mrs. Reid has a reason to kill Mr. Adams for his wealth, and she had an exterminator with her that can handle the rat poison. Finally, Mr. Adams might have killed himself by accident because he has bad eyesight. Mrs. Swanson said that Mr. Adams had bad eyesight, and had trouble reading labels. The box of rat poison was found right next to where the sugar was. If Mr. Adams had a hard time seeing the labels then that means he could have misread the label on the rat poison and chose it instead of the sugar. The reasons and evidence all conclude that Mr. Bennet did not murder Mr. Adams. Mr. Alfaro is an exterminator and the rat poison is only available to exterminators, Mrs. Reid thought if Mr. Adams died then she would have all the money he owned and his new mansion, and Mr. Adams could have killed himself because of his bad eyesight. I urge you to find that the defendant, Mr. Bennet, should be found not

Show More
Related
707 Words | 3 Pages

There was overwhelming evidence to show that Stone had earlier beaten Stone and declared him a dead snitch. Additionally, when he was last seen, the deceased was in the company of Towler, the same man who had earlier beaten him and who had a motive to kill him. Although there was evidence that Stone could have died from other causes that were nor crime related, the introduction of evidence by the prosecution on criminal agency were sufficient to convict Towler. On the action of the district attorney seizing documents from Towler without a warrant or the consent of the defense counsel, the same cannot warrant the dismissal of a case or the watering down of evidence presented (Gardner & Anderson, 2009). The prosecution evidence presented clearly proves that Towler had

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: Mr. Eldridge should be found guilty of murdering Mr. Armes with a kitchen spatula and there is sound reasoning to back up this claim. Although the defense claims that Mr. Eldridge is not guilty, they are wrong because David Eldridge’s footprints were found all over the grease which was found all over the crime scene, also Mr. Eldridge was very mad about not getting a raise that morning, and Mr. Armes got into a very big argument on the morning of the murder. Those are the sound reasons that I know back up the claim that Mr. David Eldridge did commit the crime of killing Mr. Armes with a kitchen spatula. First, Mr. Eldridge should be found guilty because Sandy Smith stated that Mr. Eldridge’s business was not doing well financially

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

So someone washed their hands to get rat poison off of their hands, and Mr. Bennett said that he was NOT outside at all. So the person who killed Mr.Adams was Mr.Alfredo. The police noted in the trial that Mr.Bennett was never outside and said that Mr.Adams had bad eyesight. Then again, the only person with rat poison was the exterminator, Mr. Alfredo. I believe he might have left the rat poison next to the sugar

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: In my opinion, David Eldiridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defense claims that he is innocent of this crime, they are incorrect because Eldridge had motive to kill Mr. Armes, there was no sign of a break-in, but all the money was gone and he had the key, and lastly, a witness had placed him at the scene near the time of the murder and his footprints were all around the body. First, David Eldridge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes because he was very angry after Mr. Armes hadn’t given him a raise and he needed money because the bank was going to repossess his house, so he could have stolen the recipe and robbed him to get the money. David was the only one that could get into the restaurant and rob Mr. Armes since he has the keys and the combo to the safe.

Read More
954 Words | 4 Pages

Prideful blood In the Adnan syed case, it is clear that syed is guilty due to the cell phone records and the testimony of Pusateri,wilds and McClain letter. Although many may believe Adnan Syed is not responsible, in actuality he is liable for his crimes. The cell phone records provided by AT&T, Which was requested by the police, demonstrate clear evidence of Syed being guilty.

Read More
318 Words | 2 Pages

Facts The indictment contained ten substantive counts and one conspiracy count. The jury found Walter guilty on nine of the substantive counts and on the conspiracy count. The jury also found Daniel guilty on six of the substantive counts and on the conspiracy count.

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

Bennet should be found not guilty is that Mrs. Swanson testified that Mr. Adams had poor eyesight and had trouble reading labels. The box of rat poison was found in the kitchen cupboard right next to the box of sugar and was the same size, color, and shape. Mr. Adams could have possibly mistaken the rat poison for the sugar. Mrs. Swanson had testified that Mr. Adams had poor eyesight and had a hard time reading labels, but Mr. Alfaro was the exterminator with the poison and was the only one who had access to the poison. Had Mr. Adams had bad eyesight, if this was true then he wouldn’t know where certain things were in the kitchen and possibly mistaken the poison for

Read More
511 Words | 3 Pages

The first bit of evidence that convicted Tod Willingham of arson was the fire allegations. They were unjustified and used outdated information to prosecute Tod. A study was done by professional arsonist John Letini and Dr. Hurst showing how the fire department’s report was false. “That in and of itself is enough to toss a case out for arson. ”-John

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members:Mr.Bennett should not be found not guilty of murder because reasonable doubt is found. Although the prosecution thinks that Mr.Bennet is guilty for murder, they are wrong because since Mr.Alfario is an exterminator he had access to the poison that killed Mr.Adams, Mrs.Reid thought that when Mr.Adams died that she would inherit all his wealth, and the reason Mr. Bennett had poison on his hands because he had touched the puddle of coffee while checking Mr.Adams pulse on accident. To begin, Mr Bennett is not guilty because Mr Alfario had access to the poison, the same poison that killed Mr.adams. The police found out that Mr.Adams had died from rat poisoning and a coffee cup was found by Mr.Adams’s dead body, the cup contained rat poison.

Read More
1244 Words | 5 Pages

Boblit and Brady were arrested and charged with murder in the first degree. In court Brady stated that although he was an accomplice to the murder he had nothing to do with the physical act of murdering the victim. He testified that Boblit was the one responsible for the horrendous act of murder. Brady’s lawyer tried to defend him to the best of it ability so upon trial his lawyer obtained the sworn testimony of Boblit but a specific part of his testimony was never admitted into court. There was never a fact of omission of guilt admitted on the record by Boblit coping to murder even though his sworn statement admitting to the murders was on July 9,1958.

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

However, the two murderers never took the time to find out more about the Clutter family. Once they realized there was no fortune, Dick did not mind. Dick’s motive for remaining inside the Clutter home was he knew there was a young girl living in the house. His motive was to rape the young girl, Nancy. Nonetheless, the other murderer, Perry Smith, had no motive for killing the Clutter family after realizing there was no fortune.

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

Although the prosecution claims he is guilty they are wrong because Mr. Alfaro is a exterminator who was seen around Mr. Adams drink, Mr. Mack had a motive to kill, and Mrs. Reid was a close relative and believed she would inherit his wealth. The strongest reason in this case is that Mr. Alfaro is an exterminator who deals with rat poison and was seen pouring Mr. Adams a drink 5 minutes before he died. It was noted that the rat poison found in Mr. Adams drink was only accessible for exterminators and Mr. Alfaro was an exterminator. In addition, the police officer and the coroner determined that the cause of death was rat poison.

Read More
2021 Words | 9 Pages

Davis ' main question with all the story is to answer what happened, and possibly explain why the people did what they did. People do not run away without reason and motivation. People do not take another person 's life without a reason and motivation. Davis says at the end of her introduction “What I offer you here is in part my invention, but held tightly in check by the voices of the past”. Davis does not have a lot to go off when it comes to personal lives.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

In order to get rid of the rats they used rat poison and when they would get the meat there was dead rats in there as well their poison and they would drag the meat on the ground

Read More
287 Words | 2 Pages

At dinner, a voice accuses each guest of a murder, and everyone realizes they may have been invited to the island for more sinister reasons than they previously believed. Anthony Marston chokes to death after his drink is poisoned, and the guests decide to ignore the fact that someone poisoned the drink, showing that they are still hopeful the situation can be resolved easily. After Mrs. Rogers dies in her sleep, Lombard

Read More

More about Mr. Bennet Should Be Found Not Guilty

Related Topics

Open Document