ipl-logo

David Eldridge V. Cambridge Court Case

550 Words3 Pages

Sophie Bloomhuff 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Mr. Eldridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defense claims he is not guilty, they are wrong because a witness saw David Eldridge at the crime before Mr. Armes was found dead shortly after screams were heard coming from the scene, Mr. Armes and Mr. Eldridge were the only people with access to the restaurant and combination to the safe and the Family Fun Restaurant had no sign of a break-in, also David Eldridge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes since the bank was going to repossess his house and Mr. Armes refused to give him a raise so Mr. Eld armes. The armed forces are. …show more content…

William Warden, a witness in this case, saw David Eldridge enter the restaurant before Mr Armes's death and an hour later Mr Armes's screams were heard. In addition, after a while, he decided to check out the restaurant and found Mr. Armes dead. If David Eldridge did not commit the crime then why did someone witness him with their own eyes entering the restaurant before Mr Armes was dead and then the witness found him dead a while after screams were heard from Mr Armes? The next reason is that there was no sign of a break-in and David and Mr Armes were the only people with keys. Also, the super burger recipe was missing and the register was empty. Police investigators found no signs of a break-in, the Family Fun register empty, Mr. Armes's safe open and the recipe was not there. Also, David Eldrige was the only other person besides Mr Armes who knew the safe combination and had keys to the restaurant. If someone else had committed the death of Mr Armes then how would they get in without it looking like they physically broke into the

Show More
Related
448 Words | 2 Pages

The second reason is there was no sign of a break-in. The Family Fun cash register was empty. The safe was open, and the Super Burger recipe was missing. David Eldrige was the only person other than Mr. Armes with a key to the restaurant and the combination to the safe.

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

First, David Eldridge is guilty because he was found in the restaurant before Mr. Arms death. William Warden saw David Eldridge enter the Family Fun restaurant two hours before Mr. Armes was found dead. An hour later, he heard Mr. Armes screaming loudly. After waiting a while, Warden went into the restaurant to investigate, and that’s when he found the dead body. Mr Warden saw David enter the restaurant two hours before so

Read More
439 Words | 2 Pages

Armes, were the only people with a key. The attorneys asked the crime scene investigator if there was any sign of a break-in, and he said no, which means that he would have had to have a key, and the two of them were the only ones with keys to the restaurant. As well as this , there was a missing recipe from the safe, and the only people with a code to it were Mr. Armes and Mr. Eldridge. This all explains that there was no break-in to anything in the restaurant because it was David Eldridge who had the key to both the doors, and the code to the

Read More
347 Words | 2 Pages

Camrynn Verkler, 1203 S. Main St., Donahue, Iowa, 52746. April 23, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W, 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Should David Eldrige be found guilty of Mr Arms murder? David Eldrige should be found guilty of Mr Arms Murder, his fingerprints were found on the spatula that was on the body, David Eldrige should be charged with this murder, there is a lot of information about it.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: David Eldridge should be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the murder of Mr. Arms. The evidence against Eldridge is his prints were found at the scene of the crime, there was no sign of a forced entry, and that he had asked Mr. Arms for a raise after working at the Family Fun restaurant for years but he was denied, leaving him to get upset and he has been heard saying negative things about Mr. Arms. The strongest reason in the case of David Eldridge is that Mr. Eldridge's prints were found at the crime scene and there had been no sign of any form of break-in. Police investigators had found fingerprints on the spatula that was used to murder Mr. Arms and came to the conclusion that the prints belonged to David Eldridge.

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

Barbra Wheeler and her husband created their own burger recipe, so there was no point in stealing the recipe. There are also differences between the super burger and the burger. The police also didn't even find the recipe at their house. There was also no way she could have got in because no one broke into the building and there was no way she got in because she doesn't have a key. Another clue that she wouldn't want to kill Mr. Armes paid off: his house was built out of the kindness of her heart.

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

The defense tried to incriminate Mrs. Barbara Wheeler by saying that she released a recipe after Mr. Armes's death similar to the Super Burger recipe, but the recipe was not found on her property. William Warden was not at the restaurant at the time of the murder, but near it. Under oath, Mrs. Wheeler said that she did not steal the recipe, and it was not the same as Mr. Armes's Super Burger recipe. William Warden has no evidence to show how he could have stolen the recipe and killed Mr. Armes other than he was near the restaurant at the time of the

Read More
396 Words | 2 Pages

Reese Morden 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Mr.Bennet is not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams beyond a reasonable doubt. There is reasonable doubt because of the evidence that Mr. Bennet had poison on his hands from unknowingly kneeling down and touching the coffee, and the poison that was used is only available to exterminators, there are other witnesses that aren't trustworthy.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

1. Write a brief summary (one paragraph each of 3-5 sentences) of the New Jersey v. T.L.O. and Vernonia v. Acton cases. In the New Jersey v. T.L.O. the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the school district, after they found a 14 year old girl smoking in the bathroom. And got her consent to search her bag. In which they found different types of drugs as well as she had intended to sell.

Read More
637 Words | 3 Pages

David Eldridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the murder of Mr. Arms. Although the defense claims he is not guilty, he and Mr. Arms were the only ones who knew the code to the safe, they were also the only ones in the building at the time of the murder, and William Warden saw David Eldridge walk into the building before he heard Mr. Arms scream and saw his dead body. My first and strongest piece of evidence is that Mr. Arms was killed with a spatula that had David Eldridge's fingerprints on it. It has been proven that Mr. Arms' throat was slit with a metal spatula and that he bleed to death. Also, the spatula was next to Mr. Arms's body.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

That’s why David Eldridge told Mr. Armes when Mr. Armes told David that he couldn’t get a raise for David’s job. That’s why David Eldridge should be guilty of the murder of Mr. Armes. That’s because the evidence to support that my evidence proving David Eldridge murdered Mr. Armes is truly strong. The first piece of evidence is that David wanted to get revenge after all the time he begged for a raise from Mr. Armes. David didn’t get a raise, so Mr. Eldridge killed Mr. Armes.

Read More
365 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that David Eldridge was the murderer of Mr. Arnes and that’s why David Eldridge should be found guilty of Mr. Arnes's death. My evidence strongly proves my argument. This is the case of David Eldridge. Many pieces of evidence prove that David Eldridge committed the murder of Mr. Arnes. One piece of evidence is that he had a rivalry with Mr Arnes.

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

Chloe Taylor 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Mr. Bennett should be found not guilty of the crime of murdering Mr. Armes because reasonable doubts exist. The prosecution may claim that Mr. Bennett is guilty; they are incorrect because Mr. Adams had bad eyesite and could have mistaken the rat poisoning for sugar, and Mr. Alfaro’s prints were also found on the coffee mug.

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: In my opinion, David Eldiridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defense claims that he is innocent of this crime, they are incorrect because Eldridge had motive to kill Mr. Armes, there was no sign of a break-in, but all the money was gone and he had the key, and lastly, a witness had placed him at the scene near the time of the murder and his footprints were all around the body. First, David Eldridge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes because he was very angry after Mr. Armes hadn’t given him a raise and he needed money because the bank was going to repossess his house, so he could have stolen the recipe and robbed him to get the money. David was the only one that could get into the restaurant and rob Mr. Armes since he has the keys and the combo to the safe.

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

Finn Carlson 786 East Sheridan Dr Eldridge, IA 52748. April 23, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Think of how bad it would be for you to get accused of a murder that you didn't commit. In this trial, that is what is happening because Mr Bennett is being accused of murdering Mr Adams.

Read More

More about David Eldridge V. Cambridge Court Case

Open Document