ipl-logo

Ia 52801 Jury Evidence

396 Words2 Pages

Reese Morden 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Mr.Bennet is not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams beyond a reasonable doubt. There is reasonable doubt because of the evidence that Mr. Bennet had poison on his hands from unknowingly kneeling down and touching the coffee, and the poison that was used is only available to exterminators, there are other witnesses that aren't trustworthy. First, Mr. Bennit had poison on his hands from unknowingly kneeling down and touching the coffee. Mrs. Singleton stated that the hand soap and towels were missing from the garden and were later found in the garden. Also, Mr. Bennet stated that he did not wear his gloves …show more content…

Which helps prove the point that he in fact did not know there was poison in the drink. Also, the poison that was used is only available to exterminators. The police investigator stated that the poison was only available to exterminators. How would Mr. Bennet get a hold of the poison if it's only available to exterminators? In addition, there are witnesses that aren't trustworthy. Mr. Alfero and Mrs. Reed were both seen at the party together and Mr. Aldreo barely knew Mr. Adams and showed up because Mrs. Reed wanted him there. Mrs Reed also believed she would inherit the will of Mr Adams. Which may have been a motive for her killing Mr. Adams. Also, Mr. Alfero was an exterminator and had access to the poison that was used to kill Mr. Adams. Mr. Alfero prepared Mr. Adams a cup of coffee and could have poisoned it. This shows how there are other suspects in the case, so there is no defiant way to say Mr Bennet is guilty. Finally, in conclusion, Mr. Bennet is not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams. Because reasonable doubt exists, this is because. Mr Bennet had poison on his hands from unknowingly kneeling down

Show More
Related
550 Words | 3 Pages

Sophie Bloomhuff 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Mr. Eldridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defense claims he is not guilty, they are wrong because a witness saw David Eldridge at the crime before Mr. Armes was found dead shortly after screams were heard coming from the scene, Mr. Armes and Mr. Eldridge were the only people with access to the restaurant and combination to the safe and the Family Fun Restaurant had no sign of a break-in, also David Eldridge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes since the bank was going to repossess his house and Mr. Armes refused to give him a raise so Mr. Eld armes.

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: David Eldridge should be found guilty of the crime of killing Mr. Armes because of the reasonable doubt that exists. Surely, the defense will say that David Eldridge is safe, but that is wrong. The reasonable doubt that is going to help prove that David Eldridge is guilty will be evidence like, how Mr. Armes was killed with a spatula which had fingerprints on it and had footprints around him when he was dead, they both seemed to be from David Eldridge. Then, David Eldridge was the only other person who had a key to the building and the safe combination of Mr. Armes. In addition, the prosecution has made the reasonable doubt sound like David Eldridge has for sure killed Mr. Armes.

Read More
479 Words | 2 Pages

Knox Baker 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: I believe that David Eldridge is guilty as charged because he was seen walking into the building the morning of the murder and David Eldridge asked for a raise and was denied that raise which provided him with a motive to kill Mr. Arms. then david eldridge’s footprint was found in the oil which surrounded mr arms dead body.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: David Eldridge should be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the murder of Mr. Arms. The evidence against Eldridge is his prints were found at the scene of the crime, there was no sign of a forced entry, and that he had asked Mr. Arms for a raise after working at the Family Fun restaurant for years but he was denied, leaving him to get upset and he has been heard saying negative things about Mr. Arms. The strongest reason in the case of David Eldridge is that Mr. Eldridge's prints were found at the crime scene and there had been no sign of any form of break-in. Police investigators had found fingerprints on the spatula that was used to murder Mr. Arms and came to the conclusion that the prints belonged to David Eldridge.

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

David Eldridge has many pieces of evidence to prove he's guilty such as he owned a key to get into the building, he arrived at the building 2 hours before the death, he asked for a raise then Mr. Armes disagreed to giving him a raise that made David Angry, and there's proof that Barbra Wheeler didn't kill Mr. Armes. The strongest piece of evidence in this case was that he was angry at Mr. Armes since the morning of the murder, he asked for a raise and

Read More
714 Words | 3 Pages

A second thing the defense might claim would be that Sheriff Heck Tate only meant to cause less harm to more people by claiming Bob Ewell had killed himself, without thorough investigation. The truth is, moreover, if Bob Ewell did not kill himself, then there is someone dangerous still lurking in the shadows of Maycomb County. A third thing the defense may say would be that there was no possible way to figure out who had killed Bob Ewell, due to the lack of light

Read More
637 Words | 3 Pages

David Eldridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the murder of Mr. Arms. Although the defense claims he is not guilty, he and Mr. Arms were the only ones who knew the code to the safe, they were also the only ones in the building at the time of the murder, and William Warden saw David Eldridge walk into the building before he heard Mr. Arms scream and saw his dead body. My first and strongest piece of evidence is that Mr. Arms was killed with a spatula that had David Eldridge's fingerprints on it. It has been proven that Mr. Arms' throat was slit with a metal spatula and that he bleed to death. Also, the spatula was next to Mr. Arms's body.

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

The rat poison that was found in the coffee is only available to exterminators, and he is one. Miss Singleton found Mr. Alfaro in the kitchen pouring some coffee about five minutes before Mr. Adams went to get sugar for his coffee. The authorities heard from Mr. Mack that Mrs. Reid and Mr. Alfaro were talking a lot during the party. If Mr. Bennett had committed this

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

Another reason why Mr. Bennett should not be found guilty is because Mr. Alfaros prints were also found on the coffee mug, and Mr. Alfaros was an exterminator and rat poisoning was only available to exterminators. A coffee cup was on the floor near Mr. Adams, the cup had rat poison residue and Mr. Alfaros prints were found on the cup. Miss Singleton saw Mr.Alfaro pour Mr.Adams a cup of coffee before Mr. Adams went into the kitchen for his cream and sugar.

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

The police had noted that Mr Adams had been poisoned with rat poison and that it was found in the cupboard, which was only available to exterminators. During the nice evening, Miss Singleton had seen Mr. Alfaro pour Mr. Adams a cup of coffee 5 minutes before Mr. Adams went into the kitchen and got some cream and sugar. Had Mr. Bennet committed this crime, if so, he would have had access to the type of rat poisoning on his clothes or belongings, which he only had on his hands.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

In the trial paper given to us, it states Mr. Alfaro’s fingerprints were also found on the cup, which may give a clue as to who killed him with rat poisoning. What could have happened is Mr. Alfaro grabbed Mr. Adam's cup, and poisoned it with rat poisoning and so when Mr. Adams went to get his coffee, he would’ve been poisoned by the rat poisoning Mr. Alfaro put in the cup. The evidence I have given shows that Mr. Bennett is not guilty and that this was all reasonable doubt put against him. There is evidence that shows Mr. Alfaro or Mr. Mack could’ve done it because first off, Mr. Alfaro was an exterminator, which could have been evidence to show that he could’ve put the poison in Mr. Adams's

Read More
458 Words | 2 Pages

They will say that Mr. Bennett murdered Mr. Adams out of pure spite because he was angry at him and seen arguing with him. They will also tell you about the poison on his hands, but this doesn’t prove that Mr. Bennett is guilty. There is still reasonable doubt that Mr. Bennett committed this crime. We know that Mr. Bennett only had the poison on his hands because he was checking to see if Mr. Adams was still alive. Mr. Bennett was also with his friend for most of the party and never once had been seen outside, which proved that he couldn’t have killed Mr. Adams.

Read More
65 Words | 1 Pages

Did anyone leave any messages for me last night? Were any messages left for me last night? The jury returned to the jury box ten minutes ago. The jury was returned to the jury box ten minutes ago.

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

In “A Jury Of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell, Mr. Wright is found dead in his home with a rope around his neck. Mrs. Wright is the prime suspect, as she acts calm and seems unphased by the incident, though she is fully aware of her husband’s death. When men come to investigate they bring along Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters, and while the women are waiting they find interesting evidence. Although at first glance Mrs. Wright does not seem capable of murder because of her calm demeanor, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale conclude she strangled her husband to death as evidenced by the crazily sewn quilt patch, mutilated canary, and unhinged birdcage.

Read More
244 Words | 1 Pages

It is extremely important as you noted here in your post, that a well-written report lays the groundwork for the testimony. The advancement in digital computing has changed a lot of courtroom evidence and testimony process in the last 30 years or so. Courtroom trials always focus on evidence and to determine the fact/truth in the issues that would come up during a trial. Therefore, only facts, logic, and authentic evidence can be admissible and used (Freeman, 2010), that is why any item or document relevant to the case must be carefully handled, the records, the transporting, chain of custody, secure storage and preservation of authenticity and integrity of these evidence are crucial elements in preparation in order to present in a court. Although,

Read More

More about Ia 52801 Jury Evidence

Open Document