ipl-logo

Ia 52801 Jury Evidence

396 Words2 Pages

Reese Morden 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Mr.Bennet is not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams beyond a reasonable doubt. There is reasonable doubt because of the evidence that Mr. Bennet had poison on his hands from unknowingly kneeling down and touching the coffee, and the poison that was used is only available to exterminators, there are other witnesses that aren't trustworthy. First, Mr. Bennit had poison on his hands from unknowingly kneeling down and touching the coffee. Mrs. Singleton stated that the hand soap and towels were missing from the garden and were later found in the garden. Also, Mr. Bennet stated that he did not wear his gloves …show more content…

Which helps prove the point that he in fact did not know there was poison in the drink. Also, the poison that was used is only available to exterminators. The police investigator stated that the poison was only available to exterminators. How would Mr. Bennet get a hold of the poison if it's only available to exterminators? In addition, there are witnesses that aren't trustworthy. Mr. Alfero and Mrs. Reed were both seen at the party together and Mr. Aldreo barely knew Mr. Adams and showed up because Mrs. Reed wanted him there. Mrs Reed also believed she would inherit the will of Mr Adams. Which may have been a motive for her killing Mr. Adams. Also, Mr. Alfero was an exterminator and had access to the poison that was used to kill Mr. Adams. Mr. Alfero prepared Mr. Adams a cup of coffee and could have poisoned it. This shows how there are other suspects in the case, so there is no defiant way to say Mr Bennet is guilty. Finally, in conclusion, Mr. Bennet is not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams. Because reasonable doubt exists, this is because. Mr Bennet had poison on his hands from unknowingly kneeling down

Show More
Related

David Eldridge V. Cambridge Court Case

550 Words | 3 Pages

Sophie Bloomhuff 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Mr. Eldridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defense claims he is not guilty, they are wrong because a witness saw David Eldridge at the crime before Mr. Armes was found dead shortly after screams were heard coming from the scene, Mr. Armes and Mr. Eldridge were the only people with access to the restaurant and combination to the safe and the Family Fun Restaurant had no sign of a break-in, also David Eldridge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes since the bank was going to repossess his house and Mr. Armes refused to give him a raise so Mr. Eld armes.

Read More

David Eldridge V. Cambridge Court Case

718 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: David Eldridge should be found guilty of the crime of killing Mr. Armes because of the reasonable doubt that exists. Surely, the defense will say that David Eldridge is safe, but that is wrong. The reasonable doubt that is going to help prove that David Eldridge is guilty will be evidence like, how Mr. Armes was killed with a spatula which had fingerprints on it and had footprints around him when he was dead, they both seemed to be from David Eldridge. Then, David Eldridge was the only other person who had a key to the building and the safe combination of Mr. Armes. In addition, the prosecution has made the reasonable doubt sound like David Eldridge has for sure killed Mr. Armes.

Read More

Was David Eldridge Guilty Or Guilty

479 Words | 2 Pages

Knox Baker 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: I believe that David Eldridge is guilty as charged because he was seen walking into the building the morning of the murder and David Eldridge asked for a raise and was denied that raise which provided him with a motive to kill Mr. Arms. then david eldridge’s footprint was found in the oil which surrounded mr arms dead body.

Read More

Eldridge V. Arms Case Essay

656 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: David Eldridge should be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the murder of Mr. Arms. The evidence against Eldridge is his prints were found at the scene of the crime, there was no sign of a forced entry, and that he had asked Mr. Arms for a raise after working at the Family Fun restaurant for years but he was denied, leaving him to get upset and he has been heard saying negative things about Mr. Arms. The strongest reason in the case of David Eldridge is that Mr. Eldridge's prints were found at the crime scene and there had been no sign of any form of break-in. Police investigators had found fingerprints on the spatula that was used to murder Mr. Arms and came to the conclusion that the prints belonged to David Eldridge.

Read More

David Eldridge's Guilty

663 Words | 3 Pages

David Eldridge has many pieces of evidence to prove he's guilty such as he owned a key to get into the building, he arrived at the building 2 hours before the death, he asked for a raise then Mr. Armes disagreed to giving him a raise that made David Angry, and there's proof that Barbra Wheeler didn't kill Mr. Armes. The strongest piece of evidence in this case was that he was angry at Mr. Armes since the morning of the murder, he asked for a raise and

Read More

Raleigh Heck Tate Opening Statement

714 Words | 3 Pages

A second thing the defense might claim would be that Sheriff Heck Tate only meant to cause less harm to more people by claiming Bob Ewell had killed himself, without thorough investigation. The truth is, moreover, if Bob Ewell did not kill himself, then there is someone dangerous still lurking in the shadows of Maycomb County. A third thing the defense may say would be that there was no possible way to figure out who had killed Bob Ewell, due to the lack of light

Read More

How Is David Eldridge Guilty

637 Words | 3 Pages

David Eldridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the murder of Mr. Arms. Although the defense claims he is not guilty, he and Mr. Arms were the only ones who knew the code to the safe, they were also the only ones in the building at the time of the murder, and William Warden saw David Eldridge walk into the building before he heard Mr. Arms scream and saw his dead body. My first and strongest piece of evidence is that Mr. Arms was killed with a spatula that had David Eldridge's fingerprints on it. It has been proven that Mr. Arms' throat was slit with a metal spatula and that he bleed to death. Also, the spatula was next to Mr. Arms's body.

Read More

Mr. Bennett Case Essay

567 Words | 3 Pages

Heidi Mattoon 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Mr. Bennett should be found not guilty of murder because there is reasonable doubt. Although the prosecution claims he is guilty, they are incorrect because Mr. Alfaro was pouring a cup of coffee before Mr. Adams came in, Mr. Adams had trouble with his eyesight so he could have accidentally put rat poison in instead of sugar, and Mr. Bennett touched the coffee when he went to get Mr. Adams pulse.

Read More

David Elderidge Murder Essay

463 Words | 2 Pages

David Elderidge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defendant claims that he is not guilty, they are wrong because Mr. Elderidge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes, the spatula that killed Mr. Armes had Mr. Elderidge’s fingerprints on it, and Mr. Elderidge was seen at the crime scene by William Warden shortly before Mr. Armes’s death. The first reason in the case was that Mr. Eldridge had a motive to kill Mr. Armes. Sandy Smith testified Mr. Eldridge was in desperate need of money because the bank would repossess his home.

Read More

Why Is Mr. Bennett Guilty

416 Words | 2 Pages

Chloe Taylor 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748. May 9, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Mr. Bennett should be found not guilty of the crime of murdering Mr. Armes because reasonable doubts exist. The prosecution may claim that Mr. Bennett is guilty; they are incorrect because Mr. Adams had bad eyesite and could have mistaken the rat poisoning for sugar, and Mr. Alfaro’s prints were also found on the coffee mug.

Read More

Guilty To Jury Members: David Eldiridge

692 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: In my opinion, David Eldiridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defense claims that he is innocent of this crime, they are incorrect because Eldridge had motive to kill Mr. Armes, there was no sign of a break-in, but all the money was gone and he had the key, and lastly, a witness had placed him at the scene near the time of the murder and his footprints were all around the body. First, David Eldridge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes because he was very angry after Mr. Armes hadn’t given him a raise and he needed money because the bank was going to repossess his house, so he could have stolen the recipe and robbed him to get the money. David was the only one that could get into the restaurant and rob Mr. Armes since he has the keys and the combo to the safe.

Read More

Mr. Bennett's Not Guilty

528 Words | 3 Pages

Mr. Bennett should be found not guilty because there is strong evidence that shows that he did not kill Mr. Adams. There is reasonable doubt that has been put against him but, there is also reasoning and evidence that he is not the one who killed Mr. Adams and that someone else has framed him for their actions. The strongest piece of evidence in this case was that if Mr.Bennet had killed Mr.Adams, he wouldn’t have checked his pulse because he would’ve already known he was dead and wouldn’t have had to check his pulse. Mr.Bennett states that he checked his pulse which shows evidence that he did not kill Mr.Adams because he would've already known he was dead. This evidence proves my claim because we all know that if you did kill someone with

Read More

Mr Stanley Is Not Guilty Of The Trial

458 Words | 2 Pages

Dear Jury Members: Mr. Bennett should be seen as not guilty of the crime of murdering Mr. Adams because there is reasonable doubt. The prosecution claims he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but this is not true because Mr. Bennett found Mr. Adams' dead body outside, however. Mr. Bennett never went outside during the party; he also was the one to check the pulse of Mr. Adams, which would explain why he had the poison in his hand. Mr. Bennett also had gloves. He would have worn them if he had murdered Mr. Adams.

Read More

Mr Bennet Should Not Be Found Guilty

343 Words | 2 Pages

Mr. Bennet should not be found guilty because there is beyond reasoning that Mr. Bennet did not kill Mr. Armes. Although the prosecution thinks he's guilty, the evidence shows that he's not. For example, one reason why he's not guilty is that it could have been the exterminator because he came over the same day Mr. Armes died and he could've put the rat poison in his coffee. The strongest piece of evidence in this case is that the spilled coffee had rat poisoning in it. Mr. Bennet should not be found guilty of the crime of Mr. Armes' death because reasonable doubt exists.

Read More

What Is The Evidence In A Jury Of Her Peers

690 Words | 3 Pages

In “A Jury Of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell, Mr. Wright is found dead in his home with a rope around his neck. Mrs. Wright is the prime suspect, as she acts calm and seems unphased by the incident, though she is fully aware of her husband’s death. When men come to investigate they bring along Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters, and while the women are waiting they find interesting evidence. Although at first glance Mrs. Wright does not seem capable of murder because of her calm demeanor, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale conclude she strangled her husband to death as evidenced by the crazily sewn quilt patch, mutilated canary, and unhinged birdcage.

Read More

More about Ia 52801 Jury Evidence

Open Document