ipl-logo

Mr Stanley Is Not Guilty Of The Trial

458 Words2 Pages

Dear Jury Members: Mr. Bennett should be seen as not guilty of the crime of murdering Mr. Adams because there is reasonable doubt. The prosecution claims he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but this is not true because Mr. Bennett found Mr. Adams' dead body outside, however. Mr. Bennett never went outside during the party; he also was the one to check the pulse of Mr. Adams, which would explain why he had the poison in his hand. Mr. Bennett also had gloves. He would have worn them if he had murdered Mr. Adams. To begin, Mr. Bennett found Mr. Adams' body outside, but he was never outside during the party. Mr. Bennett immediately checked the pulse of Mr. Adams and his drink. This would explain why there was rat poisoning found on his hands, …show more content…

Next, Mr. Bennett had gloves with him when Mr. Adams was killed. Mr. Bennett would have worn those gloves if he was the one to kill Mr. Adams so he could cover up the fact he did it, but he wasn’t seen wearing his gloves at all. Mr. Bennett was with his friend most of the party and wasn’t seen wearing his gloves. He also was working very hard to get the money he owed Mr. Adams and if he planned on killing him, he wouldn’t have wasted his time working extra jobs. The prosecution will try to convince you that Mr. Bennett is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but they failed to provide enough evidence. They will say that Mr. Bennett murdered Mr. Adams out of pure spite because he was angry at him and seen arguing with him. They will also tell you about the poison on his hands, but this doesn’t prove that Mr. Bennett is guilty. There is still reasonable doubt that Mr. Bennett committed this crime. We know that Mr. Bennett only had the poison on his hands because he was checking to see if Mr. Adams was still alive. Mr. Bennett was also with his friend for most of the party and never once had been seen outside, which proved that he couldn’t have killed Mr. Adams. Mr. Bennett is innocent and did not commit the crime

Show More
Related
398 Words | 2 Pages

The prosecution is charging the defendant Alex palmer with first degree murder of Jes Markson. Critical aspects of four witness testimonies will be analyzed and discussed. Furthermore, the prosecution will explain the importance of each testimony and how the testimony helps link the Defendant Alex Palmer to the crime. The first witness Detective Dana Brown should state that she has been working for the Hollywood police department for eighteen years, seven of which have been as a detective. Disclosure of this information to the jury will help establish her credibility.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: David Eldridge should be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the murder of Mr. Arms. The evidence against Eldridge is his prints were found at the scene of the crime, there was no sign of a forced entry, and that he had asked Mr. Arms for a raise after working at the Family Fun restaurant for years but he was denied, leaving him to get upset and he has been heard saying negative things about Mr. Arms. The strongest reason in the case of David Eldridge is that Mr. Eldridge's prints were found at the crime scene and there had been no sign of any form of break-in. Police investigators had found fingerprints on the spatula that was used to murder Mr. Arms and came to the conclusion that the prints belonged to David Eldridge.

Read More
714 Words | 3 Pages

A second thing the defense might claim would be that Sheriff Heck Tate only meant to cause less harm to more people by claiming Bob Ewell had killed himself, without thorough investigation. The truth is, moreover, if Bob Ewell did not kill himself, then there is someone dangerous still lurking in the shadows of Maycomb County. A third thing the defense may say would be that there was no possible way to figure out who had killed Bob Ewell, due to the lack of light

Read More
332 Words | 2 Pages

There are multiple strong pieces of evidence proving this to be true. These pieces of evidence prove that Mr. Eldridge is guilty. David Eldridge is guilty of Mr Armes’ murder. The strongest piece of evidence is the fact that David Eldridge had a spatula with Mr.Armes’ blood on it.

Read More
396 Words | 2 Pages

First, Mr. Bennit had poison on his hands from unknowingly kneeling down and touching the coffee. Mrs. Singleton stated that the hand soap and towels were missing from the garden and were later found in the garden. Also, Mr. Bennet stated that he did not wear his gloves

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

Dear Jury Members:David Eldridge should have been found guilty because there were many signs and evidence pointing that he was there the night of the murder and that he had a motive for killing Mr Arms. The strongest piece of evidence that shows that he was the murderer first he asked Mr Arms for a rise and he was denied and he was so mad that he planned to kill Mr Arms and secondly he and Mr Arms were the only ones that knew the code to the safe and there was no sign of forced entry which means he was had the key to the building and the combination to the safe.the strongest piece of evidence in the case was that he had a motive to kill him which makes him a suspect.when david eldridge went to his boss for a raise and he got denied he was super

Read More
637 Words | 3 Pages

David Eldridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the murder of Mr. Arms. Although the defense claims he is not guilty, he and Mr. Arms were the only ones who knew the code to the safe, they were also the only ones in the building at the time of the murder, and William Warden saw David Eldridge walk into the building before he heard Mr. Arms scream and saw his dead body. My first and strongest piece of evidence is that Mr. Arms was killed with a spatula that had David Eldridge's fingerprints on it. It has been proven that Mr. Arms' throat was slit with a metal spatula and that he bleed to death. Also, the spatula was next to Mr. Arms's body.

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Eldridge is guilty was that he was seen entering the Family Fun Restaurant two hours before the body was found and Mr. Eldridge’s footprints were found in the grease around the body. Crime scene investigators found that the floors of the restaurant were covered with blood and cooking grease. When the crime scene investigator checked the grease for footprints, they found Mr. Eldridge’s footprints in the grease around the body. William Warden testified that he saw Mr. Eldridge enter the restaurant two hours before Mr. Armes was found dead. Then an hour later he heard Mr. Armes screaming loudly, and when he went to investigate he found Mr. Armes dead.

Read More
603 Words | 3 Pages

When Mr. Adam went into the kitchen to go get some sugar and cream, the rat poison box was the same color as the cream and sugar. Mrs. Swanson testified that Mr. Adam had bad eyesight and could not read labs very well. This evidence proves that Mr. Bennett did not kill Mr. Adams because he could not buy the rat poison and if he did kill him he would not go in to go check on Mr. Adam when he went in the kitchen because he would know that he would be dead. Finally, Mr. Mack was around Mr. Adams coffee all night and he was talking to Mrs. Swanson when Mr. Adams went into the kitchen. Mr. Mack was a new friend of Mr. Adam and he got invited to the party so Mr. Adam could get to know some people in the

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

Adams had poor eyesight and it was found that the rat poison and sugar box were right next to each other so he could have mistaken one for the other. Before Mr. Adams went to get cream and sugar for his coffee while he did that, all of his guests were dancing in the lounge and playing pool, Mrs. Swanson testified that Mr. Adams had very poor eyesight and struggled to read labels. It also doesn’t help that the box of rat poison and sugar were found right next to each other with the same size, color, and shape. Since Mr. Adams had poor vision he could have accidentally poisoned himself with the rat poison thinking it was

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: In my opinion, David Eldiridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defense claims that he is innocent of this crime, they are incorrect because Eldridge had motive to kill Mr. Armes, there was no sign of a break-in, but all the money was gone and he had the key, and lastly, a witness had placed him at the scene near the time of the murder and his footprints were all around the body. First, David Eldridge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes because he was very angry after Mr. Armes hadn’t given him a raise and he needed money because the bank was going to repossess his house, so he could have stolen the recipe and robbed him to get the money. David was the only one that could get into the restaurant and rob Mr. Armes since he has the keys and the combo to the safe.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

Mack had been staying around Mr. Adams drinking a lot that night. He had been standing by the drink that night, which shows reasonable evidence Mr. Mack could’ve poisoned Mr. Adams. This evidence is supportive because it shows that Mr. Mack could also be a suspect and obviously could’ve killed Mr. Adams. After all, he had been around Mr. Adams drinking a lot the night of the party. A third piece of evidence is that Mr. Alfaro's fingerprints were also found on the cup, which may have something to do with the rat poisoning.

Read More
404 Words | 2 Pages

The reasons and evidence all conclude that Mr. Bennet did not murder Mr. Adams. Mr. Alfaro is an exterminator and the rat poison is only available to exterminators, Mrs. Reid thought if Mr. Adams died then she would have all the money he owned and his new mansion, and Mr. Adams could have killed himself because of his bad eyesight. I urge you to find that the defendant, Mr. Bennet, should be found not

Read More
548 Words | 3 Pages

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you are here because one person in this courtroom decided to take law into her own hands. The defendant, Mrs. Dominique Stephens, murdered the man that she vowed to love. This sole act by the defendant is violation of all morals and her husband’s right to live. Afterwards, she even felt guilty about this violation of justice and called the cops on herself, and she later signed a written statement stating that she is guilty of the murder of Mr. Donovan Stephens. Then the defendant later recanted this statement and said that she only killed Mr. Stephens in self defense.

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

I present the Jury with the prosecution of Mrs. Maloney under the charge of killing her husband Mr. Maloney. Mrs. Maloney described her marriage with Mr. Maloney to have been relish and loving. As described by Mrs. maloney how “Now and again she would glance up at the clock, but without anxiety, merely to please herself with the thought that each minute gone by made it nearer the time when he would come”(Dahl 3). However under certain circumstances the couple was faced upon an argument, and whiten the heat of the moment mrs. maloney hit Mr. maloney in the back of the head with a heavy object killing him in the process. “As the wife of a detective, she knew quite well what the penalty would be” (Dahl 47).

Read More

More about Mr Stanley Is Not Guilty Of The Trial

Open Document