ipl-logo

Mr Stanley Is Not Guilty Of The Trial

458 Words2 Pages

Dear Jury Members: Mr. Bennett should be seen as not guilty of the crime of murdering Mr. Adams because there is reasonable doubt. The prosecution claims he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but this is not true because Mr. Bennett found Mr. Adams' dead body outside, however. Mr. Bennett never went outside during the party; he also was the one to check the pulse of Mr. Adams, which would explain why he had the poison in his hand. Mr. Bennett also had gloves. He would have worn them if he had murdered Mr. Adams. To begin, Mr. Bennett found Mr. Adams' body outside, but he was never outside during the party. Mr. Bennett immediately checked the pulse of Mr. Adams and his drink. This would explain why there was rat poisoning found on his hands, …show more content…

Next, Mr. Bennett had gloves with him when Mr. Adams was killed. Mr. Bennett would have worn those gloves if he was the one to kill Mr. Adams so he could cover up the fact he did it, but he wasn’t seen wearing his gloves at all. Mr. Bennett was with his friend most of the party and wasn’t seen wearing his gloves. He also was working very hard to get the money he owed Mr. Adams and if he planned on killing him, he wouldn’t have wasted his time working extra jobs. The prosecution will try to convince you that Mr. Bennett is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but they failed to provide enough evidence. They will say that Mr. Bennett murdered Mr. Adams out of pure spite because he was angry at him and seen arguing with him. They will also tell you about the poison on his hands, but this doesn’t prove that Mr. Bennett is guilty. There is still reasonable doubt that Mr. Bennett committed this crime. We know that Mr. Bennett only had the poison on his hands because he was checking to see if Mr. Adams was still alive. Mr. Bennett was also with his friend for most of the party and never once had been seen outside, which proved that he couldn’t have killed Mr. Adams. Mr. Bennett is innocent and did not commit the crime

Show More
Related

Jes Markson Case Study

398 Words | 2 Pages

The prosecution is charging the defendant Alex palmer with first degree murder of Jes Markson. Critical aspects of four witness testimonies will be analyzed and discussed. Furthermore, the prosecution will explain the importance of each testimony and how the testimony helps link the Defendant Alex Palmer to the crime. The first witness Detective Dana Brown should state that she has been working for the Hollywood police department for eighteen years, seven of which have been as a detective. Disclosure of this information to the jury will help establish her credibility.

Read More

Raleigh Heck Tate Opening Statement

714 Words | 3 Pages

A second thing the defense might claim would be that Sheriff Heck Tate only meant to cause less harm to more people by claiming Bob Ewell had killed himself, without thorough investigation. The truth is, moreover, if Bob Ewell did not kill himself, then there is someone dangerous still lurking in the shadows of Maycomb County. A third thing the defense may say would be that there was no possible way to figure out who had killed Bob Ewell, due to the lack of light

Read More

David Eldridge Is Guilty

332 Words | 2 Pages

There are multiple strong pieces of evidence proving this to be true. These pieces of evidence prove that Mr. Eldridge is guilty. David Eldridge is guilty of Mr Armes’ murder. The strongest piece of evidence is the fact that David Eldridge had a spatula with Mr.Armes’ blood on it.

Read More

Ia 52801 Jury Evidence

396 Words | 2 Pages

This shows how there are other suspects in the case, so there is no defiant way to say Mr Bennet is guilty. Finally, in conclusion, Mr. Bennet is not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams. Because reasonable doubt exists, this is because. Mr Bennet had poison on his hands from unknowingly kneeling down

Read More

David Eldridge's Motivations For The Murder Of Mr Arms

500 Words | 2 Pages

Dear Jury Members:David Eldridge should have been found guilty because there were many signs and evidence pointing that he was there the night of the murder and that he had a motive for killing Mr Arms. The strongest piece of evidence that shows that he was the murderer first he asked Mr Arms for a rise and he was denied and he was so mad that he planned to kill Mr Arms and secondly he and Mr Arms were the only ones that knew the code to the safe and there was no sign of forced entry which means he was had the key to the building and the combination to the safe.the strongest piece of evidence in the case was that he had a motive to kill him which makes him a suspect.when david eldridge went to his boss for a raise and he got denied he was super

Read More

How Is David Eldridge Guilty

637 Words | 3 Pages

David Eldridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the murder of Mr. Arms. Although the defense claims he is not guilty, he and Mr. Arms were the only ones who knew the code to the safe, they were also the only ones in the building at the time of the murder, and William Warden saw David Eldridge walk into the building before he heard Mr. Arms scream and saw his dead body. My first and strongest piece of evidence is that Mr. Arms was killed with a spatula that had David Eldridge's fingerprints on it. It has been proven that Mr. Arms' throat was slit with a metal spatula and that he bleed to death. Also, the spatula was next to Mr. Arms's body.

Read More

David Elderidge Murder Essay

463 Words | 2 Pages

David Elderidge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defendant claims that he is not guilty, they are wrong because Mr. Elderidge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes, the spatula that killed Mr. Armes had Mr. Elderidge’s fingerprints on it, and Mr. Elderidge was seen at the crime scene by William Warden shortly before Mr. Armes’s death. The first reason in the case was that Mr. Eldridge had a motive to kill Mr. Armes. Sandy Smith testified Mr. Eldridge was in desperate need of money because the bank would repossess his home.

Read More

Who Is Mr. V. Eldridge's Guilty?

566 Words | 3 Pages

Eldridge is guilty was that he was seen entering the Family Fun Restaurant two hours before the body was found and Mr. Eldridge’s footprints were found in the grease around the body. Crime scene investigators found that the floors of the restaurant were covered with blood and cooking grease. When the crime scene investigator checked the grease for footprints, they found Mr. Eldridge’s footprints in the grease around the body. William Warden testified that he saw Mr. Eldridge enter the restaurant two hours before Mr. Armes was found dead. Then an hour later he heard Mr. Armes screaming loudly, and when he went to investigate he found Mr. Armes dead.

Read More

How Should David Eldrige Be Found Guilty

339 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever considered how people get away with things, like stealing and theft? Most have, and they still wonder just how. David Eldrige had all the right materials to murder Mr. Armes. His fingerprints were also found at the crime scene. This is why David Eldrige should be found guilty.

Read More

Branett Vs Mary Bennett

1224 Words | 5 Pages

In each trial, whether it’s theft or murder, the jury all have the same duty. Their burden is to determine whether the defendant is guilty of the crime they are accused of, or not. The jury is expected to take testimonies and facts into account and go forth with a decision from there. In Mary Bennett’s case, the jury must determine whether she is guilty of second-degree murder of her infant daughter. For the defendant to be guilty of second-degree murder, the jury must determine if Bennett intended to kill her daughter, made a conscious decision to do so at that moment, and was aware of the consequences of her actions (“Mary Bennett,” pg 5).

Read More

Mr Bennett Case

603 Words | 3 Pages

Mr. Bennett should be found not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams because there is reasonable doubt. Mr. Bennett went into the kitchen to check on Mr. Adams. when he was lying on the ground with spilled coffee all around his body. When Mr. Adam went into the kitchen to go get some cream and sugar, but there was rat poison by the cream and sugar and it looked alike and Mrs. Swanson testified that he had bad eyesight. That Mr. Bennett wouldn't go into the kitchen to go check on Mr. Adams because he would already know that he was dead.

Read More

To What Extent Was Mr Bennett Guilty Of Murder

690 Words | 3 Pages

Mr Bennett should be found not guilty of murder because there is reasonable doubt. Although the prosecution says Mr. Bennett is guilty, he is not because Mr. Alfaro’s fingerprints were found on the coffee mug and the rat poison that was found was only available to exterminators and Mr. Alfaro was an exterminator also Mr Alfaro poured Mr. Adams a cup of coffee five minutes before the death, Mrs. Reid was Mr. Adam’s closest relative she believed she was gonna inherit everything from him but she was also very jealous and often spread nasty rumors about Mr. Adam’s, Mrs, Swanson said that Mr. Adams sugar looks very similar in size, shape, and color. The strongest piece of evidence is that Mr. Alfaro’s fingerprints were found on Mr. Adam’s coffee mug, and that the rat poison used was only available to exterminators and Mr. Alfaro was the only exterminator.

Read More

Guilty To Jury Members: David Eldiridge

692 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: In my opinion, David Eldiridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defense claims that he is innocent of this crime, they are incorrect because Eldridge had motive to kill Mr. Armes, there was no sign of a break-in, but all the money was gone and he had the key, and lastly, a witness had placed him at the scene near the time of the murder and his footprints were all around the body. First, David Eldridge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes because he was very angry after Mr. Armes hadn’t given him a raise and he needed money because the bank was going to repossess his house, so he could have stolen the recipe and robbed him to get the money. David was the only one that could get into the restaurant and rob Mr. Armes since he has the keys and the combo to the safe.

Read More

Mr. Bennett's Not Guilty

528 Words | 3 Pages

Mr. Bennett should be found not guilty because there is strong evidence that shows that he did not kill Mr. Adams. There is reasonable doubt that has been put against him but, there is also reasoning and evidence that he is not the one who killed Mr. Adams and that someone else has framed him for their actions. The strongest piece of evidence in this case was that if Mr.Bennet had killed Mr.Adams, he wouldn’t have checked his pulse because he would’ve already known he was dead and wouldn’t have had to check his pulse. Mr.Bennett states that he checked his pulse which shows evidence that he did not kill Mr.Adams because he would've already known he was dead. This evidence proves my claim because we all know that if you did kill someone with

Read More

Argumentative Essay: The Murder Of Mr. Stephens

548 Words | 3 Pages

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you are here because one person in this courtroom decided to take law into her own hands. The defendant, Mrs. Dominique Stephens, murdered the man that she vowed to love. This sole act by the defendant is violation of all morals and her husband’s right to live. Afterwards, she even felt guilty about this violation of justice and called the cops on herself, and she later signed a written statement stating that she is guilty of the murder of Mr. Donovan Stephens. Then the defendant later recanted this statement and said that she only killed Mr. Stephens in self defense.

Read More

More about Mr Stanley Is Not Guilty Of The Trial

Open Document