ipl-logo

Who Is Mr. V. Eldridge's Guilty?

566 Words3 Pages

Can you imagine being a business owner and trusting an employee so much you give the keys to your business and the combination of your safety with your secret recipe? This was Mr. Armes. And Mr. Eldridge, his trusted employee, responded by murdering him. Mr. David Eldridge should be found guilty because reasonable evidence exists. Mr. Eldridge was seen entering the restaurant two hours before the body was found and one hour later Mr. Armes was heard screaming loudly and Mr. Eldridge’s footprints were found in the grease around the body. Also, Mr. Eldridge was the only person other than Mr. Armes who had the keys to the restaurant and the combination to the safe, there was no sign of a break-in at the restaurant, and the safe was open with the recipe for the Super Burger stolen. …show more content…

Eldridge is guilty was that he was seen entering the Family Fun Restaurant two hours before the body was found and Mr. Eldridge’s footprints were found in the grease around the body. Crime scene investigators found that the floors of the restaurant were covered with blood and cooking grease. When the crime scene investigator checked the grease for footprints, they found Mr. Eldridge’s footprints in the grease around the body. William Warden testified that he saw Mr. Eldridge enter the restaurant two hours before Mr. Armes was found dead. Then an hour later he heard Mr. Armes screaming loudly, and when he went to investigate he found Mr. Armes dead. This proves my claim because it proves that Mr. Eldridge can be put at the crime scene. Mr. Eldridge’s footprints around the body also prove that Mr. Eldridge committed the murder. Mr. Armes screaming while Mr. Eldridge was seen in the restaurant proved that he killed Mr.

Show More
Related

Court Case Of Mr. David Eldrige Guilty

448 Words | 2 Pages

The second reason is there was no sign of a break-in. The Family Fun cash register was empty. The safe was open, and the Super Burger recipe was missing. David Eldrige was the only person other than Mr. Armes with a key to the restaurant and the combination to the safe.

Read More

David Eldridge's Guilty

663 Words | 3 Pages

Barbra Wheeler didn't kill Mr. Armes and also didn't steal the burger recipe. She didn't steal the recipe because there was no way for her to get into the building without a key and David Eldridge and Mr. Armes were the only ones with the combination for the safe. Barbra Wheeler is not guilty of murder, even if she tried to sabotage him in the past, she didn't steal the recipe and she didn't kill Mr. Armes. Please consider the reasons and evidence presented and conclude that David Eldridge is guilty of murder. He asked Mr. Armes for a raise and he was denied, he was in

Read More

David Eldridge's Motivations For The Murder Of Mr Arms

500 Words | 2 Pages

secondly he and Mr arms had a motive to kill Mr arms were the only ones who had a combination to kill him. the safe and no one else knew the safe combination.and when the cops showed up the safe was open and the burger recipe was not in the safe but it was not stolen it was a few feet away from the safe and not completely gone. This proves my claim because since he was the only other person that knew the recipe besides mr arms there was no other person that could have gotten into the safe and there was no evidence of someone breaking in to the safe and he was the only one that wanted the recipe and how he was able to get the recipe. to make those burgers, too. And that shows that David Eldridge was the only one that knew how to get in to the restaurant and in to the safe Now please consider the evidence that I have presented and conclude that David Eldridge is guilty and should face the rest of his life in

Read More

David Eldridge's Murder Case Essay

423 Words | 2 Pages

A couple pieces of evidence found that leads to David Eldridge being the murderer is that he worked for Mr. Armes at his Family Fun restaurant, which is also the place Mr. Armes was found dead. Mr. Armes was found dead in the kitchen at the Family Fun Restaurant. David Eldrdge was quickly put under suspicion as he was at the Family Fun Restaurant 2 hours before the death of Mr. Armes, David Eldrdge also did not like Mr. Armers after he did not give him a raise. The police searched David’s house and found a bloody spatula, with Mr. Armes' blood and David’s finger prints. This puts Mr. David Eldridge under suspicion of the murder of Mr. Armes.

Read More

Who Was Mr. David Eldridge's Guilty?

449 Words | 2 Pages

Furthermore, it shows that Mr. Eldridge used a key to get into the restaurant and was the only other person in the restaurant when Mr. Arms was killed. Also, Mr Eldridge’s footprints were found around the body of Mr Arms and his footprints were the most recent, while also being the only ones besides Mr Arms’. When considering the previous evidence presented, you should conclude that Mr. Eldridge had murdered Mr.

Read More

David Eldridge: Guilty Of Killing Mr. Arms

260 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever witnessed a murder or murder trial? Well, in this trial I believe David Eldridge is guilty. If David’s fingerprints were on the metal spatula, he must have been the last one to touch it, the last one to touch it most likely killed Mr. Arms. David also would always ask for a raise and he would get mad once Mr Armes said he would not threaten to quit. David Eldridge is guilty because of the evidence found in the case.

Read More

Was David Eldridge Guilty Or Guilty

707 Words | 3 Pages

Armes with a spatula, I know this because his handprint was left on the spatula. When the police started their investigation, they came across a spatula that was covered in blood, they looked at the body and it seemed to be cut with the spatula. The coroner says that he bled to death from being cut by the spatula. The police took the spatula and looked more into it, they found Eldridge's fingerprints on the handle. Since his fingerprints were left on the spatula it proves that he killed the victim, also, his footprints were found near the body which means he got close enough to cause the

Read More

Isaac Harris And Max Blanck Murder Case Study

288 Words | 2 Pages

The accused, Isaac Harris and Max Blanck, were guilty of manslaughter. This was proven by the prosecution team through the evidence provided, such as the admittance of guilt, witness 2, and the building codes. The admittance of guilt is a piece of evidence that led me to believe Harris and Blanck guilty of manslaughter, because Harris admitted to having an almost obsession with employee theft. I was led to believe by this evidence that this obsession caused Harris to lock the doors and make the hallways narrow, so that he could check the employees before they left the building. To me, this proves that Harris and Blanck knew the doors were locked, and purposely locked them.

Read More

James King Is Guilty

583 Words | 3 Pages

James King Is Guilty Monster, by Walter Dean Myers. The book is about a sixteen year old boy named Steve Harmon, who tells his story about the trial for murder he is on. He is also with a twenty two year old man named James King for the same crime. Petrocelli is trying to prove both of them guilty. They each have a defendant to defend them.

Read More

Mr. Adams Guilty

620 Words | 3 Pages

and he said that he did and he was the only one that had access to it. Mr. Alfaro poured Mr. Adams drink five minutes before he went to the kitchen to get some sugar. He may have been trying to help because he knew that the poison was in the kitchen and he was trying to make sure he wasn’t really worried and calmed the whole night so he didn’t know that anything was coming. From the evidence this goes to show that Mr Alfaro is one of are top suspects and he needs to be further looked at.

Read More

Mr. Adams Guilty

474 Words | 2 Pages

With all of this evidence, he should be not guilty when seeing the cup that Mr. Adams died from, the liquid inside the fingerprints were tested and led to Mr.

Read More

Mr Bennet Should Not Be Found Guilty

343 Words | 2 Pages

Mr. Bennet should not be found guilty because there is beyond reasoning that Mr. Bennet did not kill Mr. Armes. Although the prosecution thinks he's guilty, the evidence shows that he's not. For example, one reason why he's not guilty is that it could have been the exterminator because he came over the same day Mr. Armes died and he could've put the rat poison in his coffee. The strongest piece of evidence in this case is that the spilled coffee had rat poisoning in it. Mr. Bennet should not be found guilty of the crime of Mr. Armes' death because reasonable doubt exists.

Read More

The Guilty Of Killing Mr. Adams

528 Words | 3 Pages

Mr. Bennet should not be found guilty of killing Mr. Adams because he had very poor eyesight, had trouble reading labels, and could only have died of poison by poison only available to exterminators. Mr. Bennet should not take the blame for Mr. Adams being killed because there are many pieces of evidence against him from unreliable witnesses that don’t have strong alibis or reasons for his death. Mr. Mack had a significant motive to kill him, and it was obvious to the naked eye. In addition to this information, the defense attorneys have shown many reasons why he should not be found guilty. The strongest piece of evidence is the fact that Mr. Adams had terrible eyesight.

Read More

Murder On A Sunday Morning Analysis

681 Words | 3 Pages

As you are shown in the film, after the identification of Brenton Butler and his so-called testimony to investigators, the police and prosecutors just stopped working on the case. Thus, evidence that would have supported Butler’s innocence and help find the actual killer weren’t discovered until Brenton’s defense attorney, Pat McGuinness did some investigation and research of his own. Thus, flowing from film from the trial to McGuinness’s investigation scenes shows the how he attained the information that he and his partner could present in the courtroom. While the prosecutors only had the one eyewitness, who claimed to have only caught a glimpse of the shooter and gave description that did not even match Butler. The film presents the conclusion that the police did not actually do the work to find the actual killer and if it wasn’t for Pat McGuinness and his partner wanting to find the culprit, it would never actually be solved.

Read More

Kant's Categorical Imperative

223 Words | 1 Pages

Therefore, I will attempt to explain to the town that although the man is not in custody, we have definitive proof that he can

Read More

More about Who Is Mr. V. Eldridge's Guilty?

Open Document