ipl-logo

David Eldridge: Guilty Of Killing Mr. Arms

260 Words2 Pages
Have you ever witnessed a murder or murder trial? Well, in this trial I believe David Eldridge is guilty. If David’s fingerprints were on the metal spatula, he must have been the last one to touch it, the last one to touch it most likely killed Mr. Arms. David also would always ask for a raise and he would get mad once Mr Armes said he would not threaten to quit. David Eldridge is guilty because of the evidence found in the case. David Eldridge is guilty of killing Mr. Arms. He is guilty because the murder weapon had David Eldridge's finger prints on it. If his fingerprints were on it he must of been the last one to touch it, which they last one to touch it most likely killed Mr. Arms. He also took the metal spatula back to his house, saying
Show More
Related
550 Words | 3 Pages

William Warden, a witness in this case, saw David Eldridge enter the restaurant before Mr Armes's death and an hour later Mr Armes's screams were heard. In addition, after a while, he decided to check out the restaurant and found Mr. Armes dead. If David Eldridge did not commit the crime then why did someone witness him with their own eyes entering the restaurant before Mr Armes was dead and then the witness found him dead a while after screams were heard from Mr Armes? The next reason is that there was no sign of a break-in and David and Mr Armes were the only people with keys.

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

The defense explained that blood from the crime scene were transferred to David’s sweatshirt, socks, and sneakers when he encountered his family upon discovering their bodies. The state did agree with the defense in saying that some of the bloodstains found of the items belonging to David Camm were a result of transfer, however, some were the result of spatter. After hearing testimony from both the States and the defense expert witnesses, the jury deliberated for three days, and eventually found Camm guilty of murdering his family. David Camm was sentenced to 195 years in prison without parole (Mckay,

Read More
940 Words | 4 Pages

His fingerprints were found on a map that was in the glove compartment of the victim's car. The map had the defendant's fingerprints on it, which suggested that he had handled the map at some point. This was used as evidence that he had been in the car around the time of the murder; However it just tells you that he touched a map that was in her car, they were in a relationship so they would have been physically intimate with each other. The presence of his fingerprints on the map found in the victim's car was used as evidence against him at his trial. The serial podcast goes through each one of these outcomes and Sarah Koenig shows that the evidence that they put into the trial should not have been admissible.

Read More
439 Words | 2 Pages

David Eldridge had wanted a raise from Mr. Armes forever and never got one, which gives him the perfect incentive to do something insane. The prosecution is correct in this case. Mr. Eldridge killed Mr. Armes because reasonable evidence exists. The strongest piece of evidence for this case to prove that David Eldridge is guilty is that he stole a spatula and never gave it back to Mr. Arms, who was killed by a spatula.

Read More
347 Words | 2 Pages

Camrynn Verkler, 1203 S. Main St., Donahue, Iowa, 52746. April 23, 2024 Scott County Courthouse 400 W, 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801. Dear Jury Members: Should David Eldrige be found guilty of Mr Arms murder? David Eldrige should be found guilty of Mr Arms Murder, his fingerprints were found on the spatula that was on the body, David Eldrige should be charged with this murder, there is a lot of information about it.

Read More
603 Words | 3 Pages

This is why people who commit extremely bad crimes that affect many people's lives need to be put away. Many innocent people are affected every year by crimes of theft, murder, etc., and this is why David Eldridge should be found guilty of murdering Mr. Armes in the first degree because reasonable evidence shows David Eldridge murdered Mr. Armes. One of the strongest pieces of evidence in this case was that David Eldridge’s fingerprints and footprints were found all around

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

David Eldridge has many pieces of evidence to prove he's guilty such as he owned a key to get into the building, he arrived at the building 2 hours before the death, he asked for a raise then Mr. Armes disagreed to giving him a raise that made David Angry, and there's proof that Barbra Wheeler didn't kill Mr. Armes. The strongest piece of evidence in this case was that he was angry at Mr. Armes since the morning of the murder, he asked for a raise and

Read More
332 Words | 2 Pages

There are multiple strong pieces of evidence proving this to be true. These pieces of evidence prove that Mr. Eldridge is guilty. David Eldridge is guilty of Mr Armes’ murder. The strongest piece of evidence is the fact that David Eldridge had a spatula with Mr.Armes’ blood on it.

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

The defendant wife’s friend, Menarco stated that Linda had an argument earlier in the day with her husband, Elward Roe Wanoskia. Linda later on headed home and argued with Wanoskia and after all that, Linda was shot. The defendant testified that his wife shot herself after the argument. At trial, the government sought to show by expert testimony and a demonstration that the defendant’s wife didn’t shoot herself. The demonstration was all based in the length of an individual’s arm to see how far away your arm can be to shoot yourself in the head.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

David went to the restaurant the morning Mr. Armes died before David was going to beg for a raise. Also, David Eldridge’s footprints were found all over the greasy floor around Mr. Armes’s body inside the Family Fun restaurant. This evidence proves my claim that David Eldridge is guilty of Mr. Armes’s murder, since David wanted to get revenge from Mr. Armes, David went to the restaurant the morning Mr. Armes died before David

Read More
365 Words | 2 Pages

Mr. Eldridge called Mr. Arnes a “greedy pig”. This shows that David Eldridge had motivation to murder Mr. Arnes. Also, Mr. Eldridge said that he was at the

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Can you imagine being a business owner and trusting an employee so much you give the keys to your business and the combination of your safety with your secret recipe? This was Mr. Armes. And Mr. Eldridge, his trusted employee, responded by murdering him. Mr. David Eldridge should be found guilty because reasonable evidence exists. Mr. Eldridge was seen entering the restaurant two hours before the body was found and one hour later Mr. Armes was heard screaming loudly and Mr. Eldridge’s footprints were found in the grease around the body.

Read More
459 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever been in trouble? When you are in trouble, you might want to make up a lie or something to prove you shouldn’t be in trouble. In this case, David Eldridge is trying to prove that he should not be in trouble in this case. There was a death in the Family Fun restaurant and Mr. David Eldridge should be guilty because there is enough evidence to show that David Eldridge murdered Mr. Armes. Mr. David Eldridge should be found guilty because, at the murder scene, David Eldridge's footprints were found in the Family Fun restaurant in the kitchen around where Mr. Armes was found dead.

Read More
603 Words | 3 Pages

Mr. Bennett should be found not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams because there is reasonable doubt. Mr. Bennett went into the kitchen to check on Mr. Adams. when he was lying on the ground with spilled coffee all around his body. When Mr. Adam went into the kitchen to go get some cream and sugar, but there was rat poison by the cream and sugar and it looked alike and Mrs. Swanson testified that he had bad eyesight. That Mr. Bennett wouldn't go into the kitchen to go check on Mr. Adams because he would already know that he was dead.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

This evidence should better my stand of him being not guilty because of the fact of witnesses saying that she was cleaning the house when he was leaving. The evidence also proved that he was not at the scene at the time of the murder. A witness has a description, of a man that she last seen, was homeless and looked scruffy and appeared to be in a van. This piece of evidence should help you understand the reason why I’m reversing the verdict. The people that are saying he’s guilty, will try and counter my point.

Read More

More about David Eldridge: Guilty Of Killing Mr. Arms

Open Document