ipl-logo

Mr. Adams Guilty

620 Words3 Pages

Mr. Bennett should not be found guilty of the crime of Mr. Adams murder because there is reasonable doubt it exists. Although the prosecution said that he was guilty, they are incorrect because he had bad eyesight, he was not the one with that rat poison and his family member had a strong hatred towards him. The evidence shows that he may have been killed by his family member Mrs. Reid or a new friend of his, the rat exterminator Mr. Alfaro. To start, Mr Adams had bad eyesight and he could have mistaken the boxes and grabbed the poison by accident. The rat poison was found in the sugar in the kitchen and they had very similar packaging. This could have been an honest mistake. When Mrs Swanson was being interviewed, they asked her if Mr Adams …show more content…

This can go on to show that he may have grabbed the wrong bottle because of his poor eyesight. One of the strongest pieces of evidence was that Mr Alfaro was the rat extremist and he could have put the poison on the spot to try and trick Mr Adams to think that it was the sugar because he had bad eyesight. Even though Mr. Alfaro was new to the friend group, he may be one of the highest suspects because he is the rat exterminator and the only one with the poison in hand and with access to it. During the interview they were questioning Mr Alfaro. They asked who had access to the rat poison and he said that he did and he was the only one that had access to it. Mr. Alfaro poured Mr. Adams drink five minutes before he went to the kitchen to get some sugar. He may have been trying to help because he knew that the poison was in the kitchen and he was trying to make sure he wasn’t really worried and calmed the whole night so he didn’t know that anything was coming. From the evidence this goes to show that Mr Alfaro is one of are top suspects and he needs to be further looked at. Finally, there is another suspect that should be looked at

Show More
Related
784 Words | 4 Pages

Dudley’s statements contained inconsistencies. Further, it led to the belief that Dudley was simply trying to exonerate himself as a witness when giving his statement against Moir. In addition to Dudley, another key witness Mr. Gordon’s statements also had inconsistencies. Gordon claimed that he had given a shovel to Moir prior to Acorn’s death. This may lead the jury to believe that Moir’s involvement in Acorn’s murder was planned and deliberate (para. 27).

Read More
396 Words | 2 Pages

This shows how there are other suspects in the case, so there is no defiant way to say Mr Bennet is guilty. Finally, in conclusion, Mr. Bennet is not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams. Because reasonable doubt exists, this is because. Mr Bennet had poison on his hands from unknowingly kneeling down

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: Mr. Eldridge should be found guilty of murdering Mr. Armes with a kitchen spatula and there is sound reasoning to back up this claim. Although the defense claims that Mr. Eldridge is not guilty, they are wrong because David Eldridge’s footprints were found all over the grease which was found all over the crime scene, also Mr. Eldridge was very mad about not getting a raise that morning, and Mr. Armes got into a very big argument on the morning of the murder. Those are the sound reasons that I know back up the claim that Mr. David Eldridge did commit the crime of killing Mr. Armes with a kitchen spatula. First, Mr. Eldridge should be found guilty because Sandy Smith stated that Mr. Eldridge’s business was not doing well financially

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: Mr. Bennett should be found guilty because, Mr. Adam’s cause of death was rat poisoning, and Mr. Bennett was the only person at the party with rat poison on his hands. Next, Mr. Bennett had a motive to kill Mr. Adams and had been poisoned with rat poison. Finally, Mr. Bennett would have to sell his beloved home, which had been in his family for generations, so he was desperate to kill. The first piece of evidence against Mr. Bennett had a motive to kill Mr. Adams because he owed him $250,000 and didn’t have the money to pay him back.

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

Mr Bennett should be found not guilty of murder because there is reasonable doubt. Although the prosecution says Mr. Bennett is guilty, he is not because Mr. Alfaro’s fingerprints were found on the coffee mug and the rat poison that was found was only available to exterminators and Mr. Alfaro was an exterminator also Mr Alfaro poured Mr. Adams a cup of coffee five minutes before the death, Mrs. Reid was Mr. Adam’s closest relative she believed she was gonna inherit everything from him but she was also very jealous and often spread nasty rumors about Mr. Adam’s, Mrs, Swanson said that Mr. Adams sugar looks very similar in size, shape, and color. The strongest piece of evidence is that Mr. Alfaro’s fingerprints were found on Mr. Adam’s coffee mug, and that the rat poison used was only available to exterminators and Mr. Alfaro was the only exterminator.

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

So someone washed their hands to get rat poison off of their hands, and Mr. Bennett said that he was NOT outside at all. So the person who killed Mr.Adams was Mr.Alfredo. The police noted in the trial that Mr.Bennett was never outside and said that Mr.Adams had bad eyesight. Then again, the only person with rat poison was the exterminator, Mr. Alfredo. I believe he might have left the rat poison next to the sugar

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: In my opinion, David Eldiridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defense claims that he is innocent of this crime, they are incorrect because Eldridge had motive to kill Mr. Armes, there was no sign of a break-in, but all the money was gone and he had the key, and lastly, a witness had placed him at the scene near the time of the murder and his footprints were all around the body. First, David Eldridge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes because he was very angry after Mr. Armes hadn’t given him a raise and he needed money because the bank was going to repossess his house, so he could have stolen the recipe and robbed him to get the money. David was the only one that could get into the restaurant and rob Mr. Armes since he has the keys and the combo to the safe.

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

Bennet should be found not guilty is that Mrs. Swanson testified that Mr. Adams had poor eyesight and had trouble reading labels. The box of rat poison was found in the kitchen cupboard right next to the box of sugar and was the same size, color, and shape. Mr. Adams could have possibly mistaken the rat poison for the sugar. Mrs. Swanson had testified that Mr. Adams had poor eyesight and had a hard time reading labels, but Mr. Alfaro was the exterminator with the poison and was the only one who had access to the poison. Had Mr. Adams had bad eyesight, if this was true then he wouldn’t know where certain things were in the kitchen and possibly mistaken the poison for

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Bennet was the cold-blooded murderer who killed Mr. Adams. They might think this because he was in debt to Mr. Adams, but as Mr. Bennet stated in the case, he wasn’t going out to murder Mr. Adams. Other members of the jury could also think of the tension going on between Mr. Bennet and Mr. Adams because of the yelling going on a few hours before the murder. But this is false because once again, Mr. Bennet stated that he was not out to kill Mr. Adams. Mr. Bennet is not a murderer and even if he could have killed Mr. Adams, where could he have gotten the rat poison, the rat poison that was used to kill Mr. Adams is only available to

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

Bennett not committed this crime, he shouldn’t have had any rat poison on his hands, but he did, and was the only suspect who did. This shows that it couldn’t have been Mrs. Reed since she wasn’t there and had no traces of what was used to kill Mr. Adams on her belongings or hands. Mr. Bennett is guilty since he was the only one who had rat poison on his hands while not being the exterminator. Another reason why Mr. Bennett should be found guilty is because he had means, motive, and opportunity. Mr. Adams was nagging Mr. Bennett to pay off his debt, and the only way to do that was to sell his home, which had been in his family for 5 generations, so it was surely important.

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

Evidence that supports this is that Mr. Alfaro’s fingerprints were found on the cup that he drank out of and was killed by the substance that was in it. The reason this evidence proves my claim is because Mr. Alfaro is an exterminator and that's how he has access to rat poisoning. One of the other witnesses saw Mr. Alfaro give Mr. Adams a cup and Mr. Adams died from rat poisoning. Mr. Alfaro should be found guilty of this. When going through the evidence, the killer of Mr. Adams is not Mr. Bennett.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

Mr. Bennet should not be found guilty of killing Mr. Adams because he had very poor eyesight, had trouble reading labels, and could only have died of poison by poison only available to exterminators. Mr. Bennet should not take the blame for Mr. Adams being killed because there are many pieces of evidence against him from unreliable witnesses that don’t have strong alibis or reasons for his death. Mr. Mack had a significant motive to kill him, and it was obvious to the naked eye. In addition to this information, the defense attorneys have shown many reasons why he should not be found guilty. The strongest piece of evidence is the fact that Mr. Adams had terrible eyesight.

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

With ten murderers on an island, who is the guiltiest? In the book, And Then There Were None by Agatha Christie, it was surprising that the judge decided that Anthony Marston was the least guilty when he was truly the most guilty. Not only was he drinking and driving, but he ran over two kids and felt no remorse whatsoever. The fact that he cared so little about what he did only makes him all the more guilty. Anthony Marston was truly a work of evil.

Read More
259 Words | 2 Pages

Despite Dogberry’s apparent lack of understanding for words, he was able to get information from Conrade and Borachio and bring it to Leonato, The Prince, and Claudio to prove Hero was innocent and that Don John had set up the whole thing. By doing this he was able to make sure that Claudio was still willing

Read More
725 Words | 3 Pages

Someone else’s life could’ve been targeted instead. Angela’s choice led to her two brothers wanting to save their family's

Read More

More about Mr. Adams Guilty

Open Document