ipl-logo

David Eldridge's Motivations For The Murder Of Mr Arms

500 Words2 Pages

Dear Jury Members:David Eldridge should have been found guilty because there were many signs and evidence pointing that he was there the night of the murder and that he had a motive for killing Mr Arms. The strongest piece of evidence that shows that he was the murderer first he asked Mr Arms for a rise and he was denied and he was so mad that he planned to kill Mr Arms and secondly he and Mr Arms were the only ones that knew the code to the safe and there was no sign of forced entry which means he was had the key to the building and the combination to the safe.the strongest piece of evidence in the case was that he had a motive to kill him which makes him a suspect.when david eldridge went to his boss for a raise and he got denied he was super …show more content…

secondly he and Mr arms had a motive to kill Mr arms were the only ones who had a combination to kill him. the safe and no one else knew the safe combination.and when the cops showed up the safe was open and the burger recipe was not in the safe but it was not stolen it was a few feet away from the safe and not completely gone.This proves my claim because since he was the only other person that knew the recipe besides mr arms there was no other person that could have gotten into the safe and there was no evidence of someone breaking in to the safe and he was the only one that wanted the recipe and how he was able to get the recipe. to make those burgers, too. And that shows that David Eldridge was the only one that knew how to get in to the restaurant and in to the safe Now please consider the evidence that I have presented and conclude that David Eldridge is guilty and should face the rest of his life in

Show More
Related
712 Words | 3 Pages

Mr Eldridge should be found guilty of the crime of the murder of Mr Arms because there are zero doubts that Mr Eldridge is guilty. Although the Defense claims that he is innocent, Mr. Eldridge stated that he went into the morning of the murder and begged for a raise. When denied he quit, Sandy Smith stated that he was in desperate need of money at the time of the murder. Also, Mr. Eldridge didn’t know the code to the safe where the recipe was located, making him have to break into it to be able to retrieve it. His fingerprints and footprints were found at the crime scene.

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

The defense tried to incriminate Mrs. Barbara Wheeler by saying that she released a recipe after Mr. Armes's death similar to the Super Burger recipe, but the recipe was not found on her property. William Warden was not at the restaurant at the time of the murder, but near it. Under oath, Mrs. Wheeler said that she did not steal the recipe, and it was not the same as Mr. Armes's Super Burger recipe. William Warden has no evidence to show how he could have stolen the recipe and killed Mr. Armes other than he was near the restaurant at the time of the

Read More
683 Words | 3 Pages

David Eldridge should be found guilty of the murder of Mr. Arms. Although the defendant claims David is not guilty, a reasonable doubt exists. Reasonable doubt exists from the fact that investigators found Mr. Eldridge's footprints near the crime scene, David Eldridge was also in desperate need of money but the business was failing, and two significant pieces of evidence against the defendant are that it has not been proven if Mr. Arms and David Eldridge were close friends or if they were secretly enemies, as well as why David Eldridge had benefits towards the restaurant. The strongest piece of evidence is that David Eldridge had footprints on the crime scene, however, he had quit that day.

Read More
365 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that David Eldridge was the murderer of Mr. Arnes and that’s why David Eldridge should be found guilty of Mr. Arnes's death. My evidence strongly proves my argument. This is the case of David Eldridge. Many pieces of evidence prove that David Eldridge committed the murder of Mr. Arnes. One piece of evidence is that he had a rivalry with Mr Arnes.

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Also, Mr. Eldridge was the only person other than Mr. Armes who had the keys to the restaurant and the combination to the safe, there was no sign of a break-in at the restaurant, and the safe was open with the recipe for the Super Burger stolen.

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

The main reason that I believe Steve Harmon was found not guilty is because there was a lack of evidence showing that Steve actually did something. The jury is told that Steve was supposed to be the lookout and give a signal, but even Evans confirms that Steve gave no such signal. The fact that Steve received no portion of the robbery money is also solid evidence that even the criminals did not think that Steve played any part in the robbery.

Read More
449 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever told a lie to your mom but she instantly knew you were lying? Most people have and no matter how hard you try, your mom will always know when you are guilty. That is what is happening with Mr. Eldridge. But in this scenario, we are his mother and he is guilty.

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

Like many others, David Eldridge worked in the fast food industry, not once receiving a raise. Also, like many others, Mr. Eldridge asked for a raise, to which he was denied. Mr. Eldridge became upset about this, just like anyone else would. When Mr. Armes was murdered though, everyone turned to David and accused him of this crime only because he was upset about not getting a raise like any normal person would be. Mr. David Eldridge should not be found guilty due to the fact that there is still reasonable doubt as to whether he killed Mr. Armes.

Read More
603 Words | 3 Pages

Mr. Bennett should be found not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams because there is reasonable doubt. Mr. Bennett went into the kitchen to check on Mr. Adams. when he was lying on the ground with spilled coffee all around his body. When Mr. Adam went into the kitchen to go get some cream and sugar, but there was rat poison by the cream and sugar and it looked alike and Mrs. Swanson testified that he had bad eyesight. That Mr. Bennett wouldn't go into the kitchen to go check on Mr. Adams because he would already know that he was dead.

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

Mr Bennett should be found not guilty of first degree murder of Mr Adams because there is not enough proven evidence to make him guilty. Even though the prosecution claims that Mr Bennett is guilty of murder, they are incorrect because the rat poison that was used to kill Mr Adams was only available to the exterminators, and Mr Adams had bad eyesight and was terrible at reading labels. He was going to put more creamer and sugar into his coffee, which was where the poison was. This evidence was proven by the police officer, Mrs Swanson.

Read More
288 Words | 2 Pages

The accused, Isaac Harris and Max Blanck, were guilty of manslaughter. This was proven by the prosecution team through the evidence provided, such as the admittance of guilt, witness 2, and the building codes. The admittance of guilt is a piece of evidence that led me to believe Harris and Blanck guilty of manslaughter, because Harris admitted to having an almost obsession with employee theft. I was led to believe by this evidence that this obsession caused Harris to lock the doors and make the hallways narrow, so that he could check the employees before they left the building. To me, this proves that Harris and Blanck knew the doors were locked, and purposely locked them.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

Both men were successful in their appeals as a verdict of guilty could not be settled upon as the case was based on improbabilities and circumstantial evidence that could not lead to a definite

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

Mr. Bennett should be found not guilty because there is strong evidence that shows that he did not kill Mr. Adams. There is reasonable doubt that has been put against him but, there is also reasoning and evidence that he is not the one who killed Mr. Adams and that someone else has framed him for their actions. The strongest piece of evidence in this case was that if Mr.Bennet had killed Mr.Adams, he wouldn’t have checked his pulse because he would’ve already known he was dead and wouldn’t have had to check his pulse. Mr.Bennett states that he checked his pulse which shows evidence that he did not kill Mr.Adams because he would've already known he was dead. This evidence proves my claim because we all know that if you did kill someone with

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

Some additional evidence was gas receipts and travel records that showed Kraft was in the area where the bodies were found. Kraft and his defense only had alibis and other suspects that could be the killer. They weren’t saying the victims were not murdered, they were just murdered by one or two other serial killers, William Bonin and Patrick Kearney. They also tried to say that Kraft was a hardworking and upstanding member of the community. As the trial closed, it took the jury eleven days to come to a verdict.

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

Mr. Bennett should not be found guilty of the crime of Mr. Adams murder because there is reasonable doubt it exists. Although the prosecution said that he was guilty, they are incorrect because he had bad eyesight, he was not the one with that rat poison and his family member had a strong hatred towards him. The evidence shows that he may have been killed by his family member Mrs. Reid or a new friend of his, the rat exterminator Mr. Alfaro. To start, Mr Adams had bad eyesight and he could have mistaken the boxes and grabbed the poison by accident. The rat poison was found in the sugar in the kitchen and they had very similar packaging.

Read More

More about David Eldridge's Motivations For The Murder Of Mr Arms

Open Document