In David Eldridge's house, they found some evidence. David even works at the Family Fun restaurant and that's also where Mr. Arms works. The restaurant was always busy, but David Eldridge never got a raise. David Eldridge was always mad at Mr. Arms. David Eldridge is guilty because there is enough evidence proving that he murdered Mr. Arms.
Barbra Wheeler didn't kill Mr. Armes and also didn't steal the burger recipe. She didn't steal the recipe because there was no way for her to get into the building without a key and David Eldridge and Mr. Armes were the only ones with the combination for the safe. Barbra Wheeler is not guilty of murder, even if she tried to sabotage him in the past, she didn't steal the recipe and she didn't kill Mr. Armes. Please consider the reasons and evidence presented and conclude that David Eldridge is guilty of murder. He asked Mr. Armes for a raise and he was denied, he was in
There are multiple strong pieces of evidence proving this to be true. These pieces of evidence prove that Mr. Eldridge is guilty. David Eldridge is guilty of Mr Armes’ murder. The strongest piece of evidence is the fact that David Eldridge had a spatula with Mr.Armes’ blood on it.
David Eldridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the murder of Mr. Arms. Although the defense claims he is not guilty, he and Mr. Arms were the only ones who knew the code to the safe, they were also the only ones in the building at the time of the murder, and William Warden saw David Eldridge walk into the building before he heard Mr. Arms scream and saw his dead body. My first and strongest piece of evidence is that Mr. Arms was killed with a spatula that had David Eldridge's fingerprints on it. It has been proven that Mr. Arms' throat was slit with a metal spatula and that he bleed to death. Also, the spatula was next to Mr. Arms's body.
David Elderidge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defendant claims that he is not guilty, they are wrong because Mr. Elderidge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes, the spatula that killed Mr. Armes had Mr. Elderidge’s fingerprints on it, and Mr. Elderidge was seen at the crime scene by William Warden shortly before Mr. Armes’s death. The first reason in the case was that Mr. Eldridge had a motive to kill Mr. Armes. Sandy Smith testified Mr. Eldridge was in desperate need of money because the bank would repossess his home.
Have you ever considered how people get away with things, like stealing and theft? Most have, and they still wonder just how. David Eldrige had all the right materials to murder Mr. Armes. His fingerprints were also found at the crime scene. This is why David Eldrige should be found guilty.
In my opinion, I think Adnan Syed is innocent what do you think? This argumentative essay is about a serial podcast is about the 1999 murder of Hae Min Lee. The person charged for her murder and sentenced to 15 years in prison was Adnan Syed but due to the evidence I do not think Adnan Syed is Guilty of the murder of Hae Min Lee. The first reason why I think Adnan Syed is innocent.
Mr. Bennett told authorities that he touched the puddle of spilled coffee when he knelt by Mr. Adams to check for a pulse. If Mr. Bennett did kill Mr. Adams, he would not have checked the pulse of the dead man because he already would have known that he was dead. Finally, Mr Bennett is not guilty because a box of rat poison was found in the lounge kitchen cupboard right next to the box after the murder. A coffee cup was on the floor near Mr. Adams. The cup contains rat poison residue.
Dear Jury Members: Is Mr. Bennett guilty of murdering Mr. Adams? Mr. Bennett is not guilty of murdering Mr. Adams. He is not guilty of murdering Mr. Adams because there was not enough evidence to prove that he murdered Mr. Adams. There are many other suspects who could be guilty. There is much more evidence that proves the other suspects did it and not Mr. Bennett.
Angel Andujar January 15, 2016 Honors English 4 Argumentative Essay The State of Maryland vs. Adnan Syed The case of the 1999 murder of Hae Min Lee an 18 year old student at Woodlawn High School in Baltimore, Maryland. She was last seen about 3 p.m. on January 13, 1999. Hae Lee 's ex boyfriend, Adnan Syed was arrested on February 28 at 6 am.
Adnan should have been found innocent because Jay knew where Hae’s car was, nobody saw Adnan and Hae together after school, and Asia said Adnan was in the library between the time that the crime was committed. Based on the lack of witnesses and evidence there is not enough information to justify sending Adnan to prison for life. Adnan was convicted of murder, even though the state did not have any
I believe Adnan is innocent because the evidence used to determine the verdict isn't justly sufficient, minorities were unfairly targeted for crimes, and he's psychologically incapable of being considered a murderer.
The strongest piece of evidence in this case was that he had rat poison on his hands and rat poison was the cause of death for Mr. Adams. The police officer said that the only person with rat poison on them was Mr. Bennett, and Mr. Alfaro, the exterminator, should be the
If our judicial system still believes that someone is innocent until proven guilty, then Adnan has to be innocent, because they did not prove him
“A person is innocent until proved guilty in a court of law” In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, an 18-year-old is on trial for the murder of his father. After many pieces of evidence, the three that are in doubt are the old man hearing “I’m going to kill you!” as well as the weapon of choice and how it was replicated, and finally the woman’s testimony. In my opinion, the boy could have been proven guilty, based on these the boy is not guilty.
