ipl-logo

The Case Of Anthony Douglas Elonis: Petitioner V. The United States

595 Words3 Pages

Social media plays a larger role in our daily life. The question of how free we are when we express ourselves online also becomes an issue and the fact of the First Amendment of the US law is freedom of speech. One of the cases covered two problems is Elonis v. the United States.
The case named Anthony Douglas Elonis; Petitioner v. the United States was argued on December 1, 2014. Anthony Elonis is a rap artist so that the content of music lyrics should be censored, and some artists’ music has profanity and some do not. According to the United States Courts, Anthony Elonis was arrested on December 8, 2010, and charged with five counts of violating a federal anti-threat statute, 18 U.S.C § 875(c). Despite the fact that his ex-wife, an FBI agent, and others viewing his comments might have perceived his statements as threats, he argued that he could not be convinced of making a threat. At the first time, the Supreme Court has heard a case considering true threats and the limits of speech on social media. …show more content…

For instance, he posted “There’s one way to love you but a thousand ways to kill you. I’m not going to rest until your body is a mess, soaked in blood and dying from all the little cuts.” His state could let his wife to be threatened although his statement was indirect in order to point at his ex-wife. However, everyone or even his ex-wife read his posts could have different thinking about

Show More
Related
271 Words | 2 Pages

United States v. Morrison was a supreme court case about violence against women. In 1944 while enrolled at Virginia polytechnic institute, Christy Brzonkala alleged that Antonio Morrison and James Crawford sexually assaulted her. Both male students were varsity football players. In 1995 Christy filed a complaint against Morrison and Crawford under Virginia Tech 's Sexual Assault Policy. After a hearing, Morrison was found guilty and Crawford was not.

Read More
310 Words | 2 Pages

1962 marked the beginning of a new era for the South. Baker Vs. Carr, a landmark Supreme Court Case, determined that malappropriated state legislatures were unconstitutional. The Baker Decision resulted in an increase of legislators from urban districts. Rural legislators, who were once in complete control of state capitols, could no longer dominate legislatures in the South.

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

Dear Jury Members: David Eldridge should be found guilty of the crime of killing Mr. Armes because of the reasonable doubt that exists. Surely, the defense will say that David Eldridge is safe, but that is wrong. The reasonable doubt that is going to help prove that David Eldridge is guilty will be evidence like, how Mr. Armes was killed with a spatula which had fingerprints on it and had footprints around him when he was dead, they both seemed to be from David Eldridge. Then, David Eldridge was the only other person who had a key to the building and the safe combination of Mr. Armes. In addition, the prosecution has made the reasonable doubt sound like David Eldridge has for sure killed Mr. Armes.

Read More
285 Words | 2 Pages

The United States v. Lopez case was about Alfonzo Lopez, a 12th grade student from San Antonio, who came to school carrying a hidden weapon. Under Texas law he was charged with possession of a firearm. Later on he was dismissed of this violation and was later charged with “federal criminal statute”. He was found violating “ The Gun-Free School Act”, which was created in 1990. His sentence was 6 months in prison and two years of being supervised while being released.

Read More
364 Words | 2 Pages

In the case of Timothy Ivory Carpenter V. UNITED STATES Did the government overstep its bounds in Detroit without getting a probable cause warrant, and did the government violated the 4th amendment of Timothy Ivory Carpenter? The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,but upon probable cause, the police have the right to searched, and the persons or things to be seized. That is the 4th amendment. So what are the facts of the case then? (“United States v. Carpenter.”

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

Many critics, including myself, believe that the United States Supreme Court incorrectly decided the case of Michael H. vs. Gerald D. The case was argued on October 11th, 1988 and the Court decided their stance on June 15th, 1989. The court decided that a father related by blood to his child that was also seen as adulterous, does not have the constitutional rights to paternity over the father who is married to the mother of said child. Contradicting this stance, many critics have stated their opinions on the matter.

Read More
1536 Words | 7 Pages

Prompt #2- Legal Controversies during the Trump Administration and Marshall Era Episodes from the 1780s through the Marshall era were crucial to the evolution of American legal history, as they shaped policies and laws regarding many present-day issues that are prevalent to the Trump Administration. Current legal controversies are quite extensive and illuminate issues regarding federal immigration enforcement, national security, conflicts with the press, Supreme Court nomination fights, financial policy, and land disputes. One of the most critical issues, that is constantly in the spotlight, is the matter of free speech and conflicts with the press. During the period of the Sedition Acts, there were three key Supreme Court cases that tried the defendants, critics of the Adams Administration, for making critical statements about President Adams. The government deemed these statements as untruthful

Read More
1605 Words | 7 Pages

There are many stakes when it comes to very important cases that could change a person’s life forever. The individual right at stake was his freedom of speech. His rights and freedoms were tampered with which led to this being a major court case. The public’s good could’ve been at stake by being injured due to his action

Read More
103 Words | 1 Pages

People have the tendency to take the First Amendment for granted, but some tend to use it to their favor. Stanley Fish presents his main argument about how people misuse this amendment for all their conflicts involving from racial issues to current political affairs in his article, Free-Speech Follies. His article involves those who misinterpret the First Amendment as their own works or constantly use it as an excuse to express their attitudes and desires about a certain subject matter. He expresses his personal opinions against those who consistently use the First Amendment as a weapon to defend themselves from harm of criticism.

Read More
337 Words | 2 Pages

This case highlighted the First Amendment condemning any limit on free speech. However, during the case proceeding, the Court had dissents for deciding when the government may restrict the First Amendment. The case spread the fact that

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

While in the first amendment, people do have the right to free speech, they do not have the right to physically threaten others. They jury agreed with this and the man who made this statement was sentenced to go to jail. This shows that there is a fine line between what the first amendment protects versus harmful speech. Users should be prosecuted for sending messages and threats like

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

Another great example is social media which can portray many expressions. When using any type of social media you might feel violated of the first amendment when people can report your post to be “inappropriate”. This all goes back to not having 100% right to say or post whatever you'd like. Without the cues of body language and tone, a simple post can sound threatening and offensive. So how can you overpass the law of “threat to injure the person of another” if a post is made?

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

There is no one name for the case of Frank Abagnale. He was tried in France, Sweden, Italy, and then finally the United States. Therefore, it is reasonable to call the case The United States versus Frank Abagnale. He was accused of bank fraud, identity fraud, and professional con artist. A great criminal always starts young.

Read More
821 Words | 4 Pages

By no measure does the concept of free speech permit for unchecked practice because speech which engenders the breach of peace, births fear within a citizenry, or undermines the process of justice to be exacted will prevail over law and equity vested in this nation by our Constitution. The Stone Court dealt with this issue. In Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, Justice Murphy established a two-tier theory. This theory categorized unprotected forms of speech to which “contributed to the expression of ideas or possessed any social value in the search for truth”. While Murphy’s opinion of Chaplinsky did not refer to “true threats”, his very words would be the precursors for cases to come regarding communicated threats.

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

Free speech is considered one of the essential values in the society. It protects the democratic process and ensures the diversity of thoughts and beliefs. Numerous people and groups have continuously fight for this precious right, like the UC Davis students who faced pepper spray to protest the chancellor 's wrongful behavior. Yet in recent decades, with the increasing cases of hate speech and free speech-related crime, many wonder if free speech needs some restrictions. In early February, the huge protest in UC Berkeley against Yiannopoulos, who was accused of racism and being misogynistic, caused huge damage to the public as the protesters started to act violently to stop Yiannopoulos ' speech.

Read More

More about The Case Of Anthony Douglas Elonis: Petitioner V. The United States

Related Topics

Open Document