ipl-logo

Elizabeth Of Bohemia's Argument Against Cartesian Dualism

607 Words3 Pages

In this paper I will explain Elizabeth of Bohemia’s main argument against Cartesian dualism. I will also explain why Churchland rejects Cartesian dualism and her arguments against it and what alternatives she has in mind. At the end I will explain why I think a Cartesian mind is not plausible. Descartes believed in Cartesian Dualism, which is saying that the mind and body are two different things. He says that the body can be divided into pieces but the mind/soul are indivisible. Elizabeth of Bohemia argues against Cartesian dualism by saying that humans have physical and nonphysical elements and we’re not a cogito. She says that physical things cause physical things to move, and if the mind doesn’t have a physical component then there's …show more content…

She says that we are just a physical body. She’s a philosophical naturalist, so she believes that we should only believe things that can be proven in science. God and anything non-physical is rejected in her belief. She goes completely against cartesian dualism. She says that Cartesian dualism is inconsistent with science. She brings up evolutionary biology and says that apes and humans share a common ancestor but, there's no proof of where the mind comes about. Descartes say that we are independent of the brain, churchland argues that when the brain is damaged it fundamentally change who we are and change our personality/ characteristics. She also bring up computer to argue against cartesian dualism. Descartes says that complex reasoning comes from the mind. Churchland argues that computers don’t need a mind to function. Same as humans, we also don’t need a mind. We are just physical things. Churchland also says that there is no way to prove that there is a mind/ soul. Science can’t prove it. We can think of our mind as a software and you’re brain as a hardware. Here, Churchland will say that only “hardware” matters and that if there’s enough neuroscience, we can see what you are thinking and picturing in your brain. She says that all fields interact/ come together to understand the brain. There’s no conflict, they all work together to a certain angle (Churchland, pg.

Show More
Related
291 Words | 2 Pages

In reading the correspondence between Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and Descartes, it is painfully obvious to the reader the necessary and overwhelming cordial language. The princess is not known for her philosophies, but through the correspondences with Descartes shows her contemplative thoughts. Although she is not forth coming of any new ideas or sheds light on any epiphanous revelations, yet she is critical of Descartes work. Inasmuch one can only read between the lines of her correspondences and thereby extrapolate her contemplative thoughts. Elisabeth is intrigued by Descartes’s assertion of the soul and body, and their independence of each other and asks him to clarify his position.

Read More
213 Words | 1 Pages

CHIDIEBUBE OPARA PHIL 1301 PROF BROWN July 10, 2017 PRINCESS ELISABETH First, in my essay about what Princess Elisabeth was asking Descartes to clarify was about the meditation. This meditation was to give an expression of how the mind and the body interact to one another. Next, In Descartes response to Princess Elisabeth, he claims that the mind and the body are the two different important substances in our human beings.

Read More
890 Words | 4 Pages

To show this appeal Carr uses a vast amount of statistics and states his credentials to generate this appeal. By doing so this strengthens his credibility and concern from readers to notice the problem. Because of his concern of the brain changing, he provides a limitless chunk of science incorporating the brain altering including examples such as biology, psychology, and heavily on neurology. “That doesn’t mean that we can’t, with concerted effort, once again redirect our neural signals and rebuild the skills we’ve lost.” (35) Although Carr is concerned of this problem, he is showing that he is optimistic that everyone can overcome technology controlling their brains.

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

According to Descartes there was a clear separation between humans and animals in regards to mind body dualism. He believed that animals were nothing more than simple machines incapable of reason and language. That they lacked a mind unlike humans, who have a sound reasoning mind and mechanical body. -Erica Trujillo 2.)

Read More
1404 Words | 6 Pages

To what extent did the counterculture movement and foreign/domestic affairs influence popular films in the 1960s-70s? Sophia He Fritch 6th Block May 8, 2023 During the 1960s and 70s, America underwent a period filled with anti-war movements and ever-changing youth culture. This was due to Johnson and Nixon’s presidential administration, the Vietnam War, and the rejection of conformity seen in younger individuals. However, political and social demise in the nation shifted the film industry to a new era of self-expression and broke down conventional norms, as seen through award-winning movies such as “The Godfather” and “Star Wars.” These movies proved that one of the darkest time periods of our nation was simultaneously one of

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

In this paper, I will deliver a reconstruction of Descartes’ Cogito Argument and my reasoning to validate it as indubitable. I will do so by justifying my interpretations through valid arguments and claim, by showcasing examples with reasoning. Rene Descartes is a French Philosopher of the 17th century, who formulated the philosophical Cogito argument by the name of ‘cogito ergo sum,’ also known as “I think, therefore, I am.” Rene was a skeptic philosopher amongst many scholastic philosophers of his time. To interpret his cogito argument as indubitable and whether it could serve as a foundational belief, he took a skeptical approach towards the relations between thoughts and existence.

Read More
172 Words | 1 Pages

Therefore, Descartes argues that the mind and the body must be two logically distinct

Read More
205 Words | 1 Pages

A theory that contradicts the view point Cartesian dualism has, is Phenomenology. For phenomenologist's', the human body is not a more extensive physical component contrary to a non-extended mind, but a experienced “here” from which almost all “there’s” are “there”; a locus of diverse varieties of feelings that may solely be experienced firsthand by the embodied individual involved; along with a coherent system of movement potentialities making it possible for us to encounter every moment of our situated, practical-perceptual functional life as indicating “more” than our existing perception provides. In phenomenology of embodiment (Edmund Hursell), then, the resided human body is a lived central part of experience, as well as both its movement

Read More
1919 Words | 8 Pages

In the sixth meditation, Descartes postulates that there exists a fundamental difference in the natures of both mind and body which necessitates that they be considered as separate and distinct entities, rather than one stemming from the other or vice versa. This essay will endeavour to provide a critical objection to Descartes’ conception of the nature of mind and body and will then further commit to elucidating a suitably Cartesian-esque response to the same objection. (Descartes,1641) In the sixth meditation Descartes approaches this point of dualism between mind and matter, which would become a famous axiom in his body of philosophical work, in numerous ways. To wit Descartes postulates that he has clear and distinct perceptions of both

Read More
334 Words | 2 Pages

Dualism had convictions like any other person, he trusted that a man comprised of issue which is the physical things that strolls, talks, and plays the accordion, and mind which is the nonphysical substance that considers, questions, and recalls the tune to "Lady of Spain." Descartes created systematic geometry where three-dimensional articles can be mapped on a two-dimensional plane, called Cartesian

Read More
1520 Words | 7 Pages

I will now explain why Descartes’ second response weakens his arguments in his Sixth Meditation. Descartes argues that both (1) and (2) are true. However, in his response to Elisabeth, Descartes argues that (1) and (2) are contradictory. If (1) and (2) cannot both be true at the same time, then at least one of (1) and (2) is false. I think that by acknowledging that (1), mind and body are distinct, is false, Descartes can resolve the contradiction without damaging his metaphysics too

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

To begin with, Dualism is the philosophical doctrine, first introduced by Rene Descartes, that the Mind and Body are two distinct separate entities. Rene Descartes believed that the Mind and Body were separate entities that were not only independent from one another, but that both were composed of dissimilar elements. Descartes explains that the body, and all its physiological attributes, are composed of “Physical” matter, and as such, dwells in the material realm and abides the laws of Physics or the laws of nature. Conversely, the Mind and all its attributes, thoughts, emotions and qualia, are composed of “Spiritual” matter, and as such, dwells in the immaterial realm and does not abide to the laws of physics or nature.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

In his philosophical thesis, of the ‘Mind-Body dualism’ Rene Descartes argues that the mind and the body are really distinct, one of the most deepest and long lasting legacies. Perhaps the strongest argument that Descartes gives for his claim is that the non extended thinking thing like the Mind cannot exist without the extended non thinking thing like the Body. Since they both are substances, and are completely different from each other. This paper will present his thesis in detail and also how his claim is critiqued by two of his successors concluding with a personal stand.

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

Various philosophers and scientists have inquired about the mind and body issue for a long time. The mind-body philosophies try to explain the way a person’s mental state and processes are linked to the physical state. The core of the mind and body is that individuals have a biased experience of an inner life that appears detached from the physical world. Although they are separated, they need to work together in some way. Individuals may appear to have physical properties and mental properties.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

This paper will critically examine the Cartesian dualist position and the notion that it can offer a plausible account of the mind and body. Proposed criticisms deal with both the logical and empirical conceivability of dualist assertions, their incompatibility with physical truths, and the reducibility of the position to absurdity. Cartesian Dualism, or substance dualism, is a metaphysical position which maintains that the mind and body consist in two separate and ontologically distinct substances. On this view, the mind is understood to be an essentially thinking substance with no spatial extension; whereas the body is a physical, non-thinking substance extended in space. Though they share no common properties, substance dualists maintain

Read More

More about Elizabeth Of Bohemia's Argument Against Cartesian Dualism

Open Document