ipl-logo

Theories Of Social Justice

1007 Words5 Pages

According to the NASW (2018), social workers primarily focus on social justice rooted in “issues of poverty, unemployment, discrimination, and other forms…” Social justice is then accomplished by seeking to “promote sensitivity to and knowledge about oppression and cultural and ethnic diversity,” in addition to seeking out the necessary information for services and resources. Furthermore, social justice, according to the NASW pertains to equality in economic, political and social rights and opportunities.
A tension point within a social justice framework is the simple fact of ensuring that not only groups, but also individual people are supported in receiving justice. For example, a certain religious group may say they are experiencing social …show more content…

According to Sherwood (1997), the definitions of justice are essentially assumed based on worldviews. Lebacqz (1986) explains that there are six worldviews: utilitarianism, John Rawls’ perspective, the entitlement theory by Robert Nozick, the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, and Jose Porfirio Miranda.
Mill provides the utilitarianism perspective of social justice. Mills stated that “the right thing to do is what produces the most good” (Lebacqz, 1986, p. 15). Therefore, justice is accomplished when the most good is produced for all people. On the other hand, Rawls provided the idea that justice is achieved when the least advantaged is benefitted. The main difference between Mill and Rawls is that Mill is focused on the outcome while Rawls is focused on the process of how justice is …show more content…

One of the points discussed with the common good was the idea of individualism. Though the common good strives for communal equality, social justice is on a more individualistic level, striving for justice within individuals. It was previously mentioned that it is important to find a balance between individualism and the common good. Having reached the common good brings society one step closer to accomplishing social justice.
Nevertheless, optimal health and well-being, the common good, and social justice all closely relate to one another. Without one aspect, another cannot be accomplished. Lebacqz (1986) clearly points out in the bishops’ perspective of justice that “individual rights and the common good are never in opposition to each other but are mutually supporting basic principles” (p. 71). As previously mentioned, individual rights represent social justice. Without optimal health and well-being, there is not love. Without love, there is not social change for the common good nor social

Show More
Related
827 Words | 4 Pages

In America, citizens are granted their own individual rights and freedoms. Therefore, it is difficult to imagine if one's own personal liberty no longer existed due to the fact that their only concern was the betterment of their society. One's self worth was no longer determined from within, but by one's peers. Many believe that the solution to the selfishness which plagues society is Altruism.

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

Social justice is often strived for by society. It is a necessary force in allowing humankind to coexist. However, the individual also has to play a role in maintaining social justice. The role of the individual is stated in the texts Fahrenheit 451 and “The Pedestrian” by Ray Bradbury and “Letter From Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr. by illustrating the consequences of not participating in the monitoring of justice.

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

All throughout history there have been many conflicting political philosophies. There are two, however, which have gained the most recognition. These are the common good philosophy and the natural rights philosophy. Both philosophies have their own views. The natural rights philosophy, for instance, is the belief that government should only have the power that is given to them by the people.

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

The wellbeing of other people is important. This theory also states that we should not use people merely as a means to an end. Instead “check that the act will treat other persons as ends in themselves” (O’Neal 412) which would promote giving money to the homeless person. We should try to act in a way that benefits others. At the same time, we cannot fulfill all what others want because “their wants are too numerous and diverse, and of course, sometimes incompatible” (O’Neal 414).

Read More
963 Words | 4 Pages

All people are given the numbing safety of having no talents, no favoritism, and no ego. “Preach Selflessness. Tell a man that he must live for others. ”(The Soul of a Collectivist) By being one and the same, everyone is promised a sense of equality, something mankind fights over relentlessly.

Read More
960 Words | 4 Pages

To do good or to do justice? The question in me arises after learning about Jan Narveson and Peter Singer’s opposing views when it comes to feeding the hungry. In a nutshell, Peter Singer believes we have an obligation to give to charity, and Jan Narveson completely disagrees. Both have very distinctive views, Jan Narveson being a libertarian and Peter Singer being a utilitarian, making it hard to support one more than the other. As you read my essay, you will learn about Jan Narveson and Peter Singer’s different point of views when it comes to the universal issue of feeding the hungry, and how they can become conflicting.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

Rawls’ idea of justice as fairness, which he presented in his book, “A Theory of Justice,” emphasizes the importance of equal opportunities and equal distribution of wealth and resources in society. This idea resonates with me because, as someone who values fairness and equality, I believe that everyone should have the same chance to succeed and live a fulfilling life. Rawls’ work has taught me to be more aware of societal inequalities and to work towards creating a fairer and more just

Read More
1264 Words | 6 Pages

One of the fundamental values in the NASW Code of Ethics is social justice. As social workers we are responsible for promoting social justice and equality. “Social workers should act to expand choice and opportunity for all people, with special regard for vulnerable, disadvantaged, oppressed, and exploited people and groups” (NASW, 2008, 6.04(b)). Restrictive laws such as these illustrate the necessity for social workers to be involved and knowledgeable about current policy and the micro, mezzo, and macro implications they have. For example, as social workers we owe it to our clients to understand how policies and laws impact their access to resources and opportunities such as health care, education, employment and housing.

Read More
568 Words | 3 Pages

First of all, I would like to introduce what social justice means to me. Social justice doesn’t mean just equality, but justice or equity. Nobody is the same and some people need more help than others. For example, there is one person who is left handed and one right handed. There should be notebooks with the spiral on the left and some on the right, so they both can have an opportunity.

Read More
1508 Words | 7 Pages

According to the National Alliance of Social Workers (NASW), social justice is one of the primary ethics which social workers must uphold. Empowerment is a social work theory rooted in social justice, with a main goal of reducing social inequalities through community building and redistribution of access to power. The basic premise of empowerment is "to change the environment, change yourself" (Van Wormer & Besthorn, pg. 212). However, in order to change one 's environment or self, there must be options available and opportunities for individuals to have control over their own decisions. Empowerment theory also aims to build community through citizen participation, collaboration and engagement among community members.

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Anti-oppressive practice focuses on the structural inequalities and places the blame that service users internalize on the structures and systems themselves (Ajandi, 2018). Humanistic and social justice values and ideas shape anti-oppressive practice (Healy, 2015). They address inequalities that affect opportunities of service users, due to the interlocking of social relations and oppression (Burke & Harrison, 2002). AOP aims to identify oppressions and define ways in which social workers can attempt to become anti-oppressive, avoid discomfort, and end oppression to service users (Strega, 2007). It highlights mutual involvement between the social worker and the service user, challenging forms of oppression and inequalities (Burke & Harrison, 2002), and presents the idea that service users do not occupy a “single identity”, but instead have interlocking oppressions that work together to put clients at a social disadvantage (Strega, 2007).

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

When it comes to lawmaking in the present-day United States, many things influence proposed bills and passed laws, like current or possible issues the country could face noticed by the legislative branch. Most of the time, however, it’s things like the citizens of the country that bring attention to issues the legislative branch can’t or won’t exactly acknowledge themselves. It is so that makes individuals a large influence in lawmaking because of direct citizen involvement with the government, interest groups, and political bias and support. American citizens are given the options of being involved in what laws are issued by two processes: the initiative and the referendum. The initiative process allows citizens to propose laws to the legislature

Read More
2828 Words | 12 Pages

The discussion on the social justice and injustice is one of the most important issues in cotemporary global scenario. New Oxford American Dictionary defines Social Justice as “justice in terms of the distribution of wealth, opportunities, and privileges within a society”2 (Wikipedia). Contrary to it where inequalities persist in the society it falls within the sweep of injustice. Merriam Webster Dictionary defines injustice as “unfair treatment: a situation in which the rights of a person or group of people are ignored”3 (Meriam- Webster). Thus it can be said that the concept of social justice takes the objectives of removing inequalities and affording equal opportunities to all citizens in social, economic and political spheres and social

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

As social work professionals, we have a commitment to advocate for our clients. Because of our advocacy commitment, we also should be committed to social justice. Change cannot happen overnight; however, it also cannot happen if people are not willing to speak up about the things they are passionate about. Additionally, social workers must ensure that they are empowering their clients. As social workers, we should be committed to using a person first approach.

Read More
990 Words | 4 Pages

and Walters, Toni S. 2007, p. 27). Social justice is “a moral obligation that reflects the highest standards by which individuals within organizations should be treated”. (Byrd. 2014, p. 520). We can see that one single definition cannot define the concept of social justice; however, the literature suggests that contemporary philosophy of social justice co-exists with expression of human rights, fairness and

Read More

More about Theories Of Social Justice

Related Topics

Open Document