ipl-logo

Essay On Adverse Possession

2558 Words11 Pages

Adverse Possession is a claim to the title of a private (non-governmental) property by an occupant who has notoriously, openly, and visibly occupied the property continuously for a certain period (commonly 12-20 years). It may be claimed for a property that has been abandoned, or in opposition of the rights of its actual lawful owner who does not challenge its possession by the claimant and the claimant enjoys the possession without paying any consideration for the land.
Section 27 of the Limitation Act, 1963 proclaims: At the determination of the period hereby limited to any person for instituting a suit for possession of any property, his right to such property shall be extinguished.This provision, when read with Articles 64 and 65 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 establishes the law of adverse possession as it stands in India today.
Its primary function was to quieten titles and rectify any mistakes in conveyancing but over the period of time it is used a means of trespassing when some owners just sleep on their …show more content…

It can also be said that the Indian law on adverse possession needs major changing in favour of the person having the actual valid ownership title over the land in dispute not compulsorily but in some cases where it is needed. The same was held by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana v.Mukesh and Ors. It was held by the court that - “Adverse possession allows a trespasser – a person guilty of a tort, or even a crime, in the eyes of law – to gain legal title to land which he has illegally possessed for 12 years. How 12 years of illegality can suddenly be converted to legal title is, logically and morally speaking, baffling. This outmoded law essentially asks the judiciary to place its stamp of approval upon conduct that the ordinary Indian citizen would find

Show More
Related
902 Words | 4 Pages

To be granted 'native title ' they must prove that they have not done anything to break their connection to the land, such as selling or leasing the

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

In fact, she notes that cattle trespassing and damaging crops contributed to tensions far more than cultural differences did at the time. The issues stemmed from continued English growth as the Indian claims to land gradually shrunk as a result of declining population and unclear borders with newly settled English towns. The courts did very little to actually tackle the problem, in many cases deferring arbitration to the local selectmen of the nearby towns, in some cases these were the men who own the offending

Read More
359 Words | 2 Pages

Discovery of land brings with it the right to obtain title either by purchase or conquest, subject to the Indians’ right of occupancy. However, the treaty ending the American Revolutionary War transferred sovereignty and power of the lands under such transfers from the British to the United States. The land conveyance to Johnson in this case was made under English rule. The land came under American rule and thus the transfer to Johnson became invalid under American law after the American Revolution,. Additionally, the Indians had a right to annul the agreement with Johnson and reserve the land for themselves in the treaties between the Indians and the United States,.

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

why would America claim it's theirs if they’ve probably never even seen the land. According to an article written by PBS I titled “Indian Removal” it states, “In 1823 the Supreme Court handed down a decision which stated that Indians could occupy lands within the United States, but could not hold title to those lands. This was because their “right of occupancy” It's ridiculous that America wants to move something or more importantly someone that has been there for hundreds of years. If you don't understand what I mean, Think about it this way, would you want to be moved from your house after living there for live thirty years.

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

We like to think of our land as our land, but is it really ours? We all know of Squanto and how he helped the pilgrims survive, yet we fail to show our appreciation. After helping these new people to their land, the Indians including the Osage are driven from their land to deserted reservations meant specifically for them in the Indian removal act. To make matters worse, the land rush of 1889 had the Osage moved to even smaller areas. Now the Osage were relying on the government to support them as they knew not how to plant crops and could not scavenge as they used to.

Read More
938 Words | 4 Pages

The government eventually passed the native title in which stated that the laws and regulation for the courts follows in future claims. This had all happened in 1993. Many non- indigenous people did not understand why Mabo had put so much effort into all this when it was just land. They did not realize the issue that Mabo was stating, butF why would the non-indigenous people see a problem.

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

Land people were required to file their claims to specific places in order to gain permanent title. A kuleana plot was entirely independent of the traditional ahupua'a in which it was situated and it could also be sold to parties with no historical ties to the area. Lands historically controlled by the king and other ali`i were formally divided and commoners were given an opportunity to claim their traditional family lands. Due in part to different cultural beliefs of property, many claims were never established and foreigners were able to acquire large tracts of land

Read More
1022 Words | 5 Pages

According to Cronon, “Many European visitors were struck by what seemed to them the poverty of Indians who lived in the midst of a landscape endowed so astonishingly with abundance” (Cronon 33).European ideas about owning land as private property clashed with natives’ understanding

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

The American Indians were suspicious if the people that had one demanded their land are now truthfully giving it back and welcoming them as one of their own. An example of this is on document ten. Whether it be instantaneous or progressive, the many changes that the Revolution had brought about has made

Read More
384 Words | 2 Pages

This breaks a part communication between tribes and makes them unstable. It’s a completely underhanded move that tore many lives a part. The law was created to provide further rule over Indian Territory, which they already have gained a lot in recent time. The Indians are being transformed by law, not by will.

Read More
275 Words | 2 Pages

More commoners in addition had expanded in to the southwestern lands after the Mexican-American War because of inexpensive land, during the time Mexicans had supervised the wide area of the Southwest conserving their chapels and ranches, Americans shortly ordained the Mexicans out of the Region nonetheless those who remained adjusted to the Anglo society. Planters won lands from Mexicans and began Discriminating, by responding Mexicans retaliated by assaulting American cliques, Mexican Americans in California Encountered situations equivalent to those in the south and west. Native American had also faced Prejudice by Anglo Americans. (Doc B) As the numbers duplicated laws were Passed that made titles of Possession problematic for the locals escalation rose in the late

Read More
672 Words | 3 Pages

Intolerable Acts The Intolerable Acts can be viewed as one of the first sparks to the flaming fire of America claiming Independence. The Intolerable Acts, also called the Coercive Acts, were a series of laws passed in 1774 in order to punish the colonies for defying their rule. Four out of five of the Intolerable Acts were directed towards Massachusetts directly and the other was directed at Quebec. All of the Acts were supposed to stop the colonies from defying England’s Rule and show the colonies that England was still in charge.

Read More
614 Words | 3 Pages

The Land Ethic Argument Outline Aldo Leopold’s “The Land Ethic” is an essay describing why we should not treat our land as our property. The first part of half of his essay is based on an anecdote that alludes to Odysseus returning from Troy to behead his slaves. His comparison there is that as once it was alright to treat people as property, it is now just fine to do the same thing to your land. Additionally, as ethics of the treatment of people changed as with the ethics of land treatment.

Read More
640 Words | 3 Pages

Ownership of land was the concept of private property that one person or group owned permanent, absolute control of a part of land. This was difficult to understand for many Native Americans because they have practiced a communistic land system for a long period of time. Land was not a product, perceptible, or an inert item that could be sized and sold. The Native Americans never established a structure or civilization of personal land ownership. Their land was not possessed by people and instead belonged to the community as a whole.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

Superiority theory is the oldest theoretical approach to humor. The theories which view humor as an expression of aggression have been termed as the superiority theories. These theories are also known as disparagement or aggression theories. According to Plato, laughter originates in malice i.e. one enjoys to see the other person suffering or in adversity.

Read More

More about Essay On Adverse Possession

Related Topics

Open Document